Ok, so people can still generate and spread photos anonymously
Great job that does
So you think the photo I posted on page one should be illegal?
wait what is this
Stalin edited a purged party member from photos
So you think the photo I posted on page one should be illegal?
Yes. I don’t think AI generation should be protected under the first amendment
Stalin edited a purged party member from photos
*purged party member that he ordered to commit mass atrocities so that he could take the blame then die
*purged party member that he ordered to commit mass atrocities so that he could take the blame then die
im sure there’s an explanation for it like every other one
only issue i see is, how enforceable would any regulation on this be?
She should definitely use the law to set a precedent and i support her, but just how easy is it to regulate large language models and other generative AI?
*purged party member that he ordered to commit mass atrocities so that he could take the blame then die
Wet toilet paper
Carti could die idgaf I’m here for music
Saying this and being the active mod of the Carti thread is insane haha
Can’t believe this wasn’t the first post ITT smh
*purged party member that he ordered to commit mass atrocities so that he could take the blame then die
maturity is seeing them write about stalin as paranoid, insane, unstable and a murderer and then realising with time he was only a murderer
Saying this and being the active mod of the Carti thread is insane haha
Thread is three years old you don’t know how badly I want it off my hands
id rather be that than a delusional tankie
You’re a Canadian tundra-cracker using Reddit words
If I were you I’d let the depression win
Yes. I don’t think AI generation should be protected under the first amendment
So what’s your take on hyper realistic paintings/photoshop?
I think if your post AI photos you can potentially liable for defamation of character. But idk. What type of legislation can you pass and what does under it?
So what’s your take on hyper realistic paintings/photoshop?
I think if your post AI photos you can potentially liable for defamation of character. But idk. What type of legislation can you pass and what does under it?
Hyper realistic paintings suck but that is a human medium
Once again I simply want people to not post sexually provocative AI generation without the subjects consent
Leave the rest to the legislators
Hyper realistic paintings suck but that is a human medium
what
that doesn’t come off as arbitrary to you? hyper realistic p*** sucks but at least it comes from a human hand?
You’re a Canadian tundra-cracker using Reddit words
If I were you I’d let the depression win
I learned my reddit words on ktt unfortunately
youre a communist on a disgusting capitalists fansite so historically speaking you should be purged
Thread is three years old you don’t know how badly I want it off my hands
Coulda fooled me
what
that doesn’t come off as arbitrary to you? hyper realistic p*** sucks but at least it comes from a human hand?
I’d love to ban them too but every flag clutching moron would cite the holy amendment
Lapses in judiciary review/interpretation create an opportunity to kill any sort of protections for this garbage