Water Giver

1y

whoops uh oh guys, looks like @Zackbrah went ghost again, as usual when he's confronted with reality. thats okay tho - i'll let them know some of the list anyways. long read, but he want to lie on me like how he lies on topics with such authority :)

things zak has been proven to be wrong on:

• thinking every legend rapper has to be "battle tested" as a made up slight to kendrick even saying that is the only smudge to kendrick never being a GOAT - even tho legends like DMX, Andre 3000, Snoop DOg and more have never been an actual Rap beef (although dmx did do some actual battle rapping before he got signed). which is abvious wrong and a made up criteria. which few later i guess kendrick did end up pretty battle tested anyways. even trying to pull the "real hiphop" card even tho he doesnt talk about nay rap outside of kendrick, drake and kanye and is mostly a pop fan. zak ignores any mention of this now.

• doesnt know how number projections work. the most basic of understanding data growth and is regularly used in music. he fought for his ever dear life about number and chart projections against I and other in my NLU thread. even having a mini meltdown. and i even told him number projections are literally bascially always right with only a few thousands of an error. he tried to deny this literal statistical fact (you cant get more factual than literal data points and data growth). and now in present, wow what do you know, I and others were right and those chart n number projections about it becoming the biggest srap song of the streaming era is right. zak ignores any mention of this now.

• wrong about how bots work on spotify (and other major platforms) and their threshold. claiming spotify cannot detect bots easily. wrong again, spotify lets low numbers of bots through because it doesnt mean much. it is easy to get away with 10,000 bots, but hard to get away with 100,000 bots. which that "100,000" bots would affect them poorly with advertisers, money payout and THEIR DEALINGS WITH OTHER LABELS (like Sony or Warner) that would pull out from them if they show favoritism, and its why the bot scammers keep a low threshold of bots to keep their infinite money glitch working.

Which then users posted to him times when spotify has literally stopped major at once botting, and has stopped other tactics of "cheating" from a tists as well such as having the volume on 0 with repeats, or static/blank songs. which then spotify released their own paper on how they go about things, has been proven in court, and for something like NLU to get gigantic amount of streams that make it the #1 oat would easily blow up their bot detector and would strain their relationship with other labels and advertisers. even tho many have said even outside spotify that this is true with a paper trail history, he now ignores this. while the only one on "his side" is akademiks and the rando ig user he dug out. i also work with indie artists that have to deal with these games, so this one is more of a personal experience as well.

that is just a few things he has been majorly wrong on.

its okay tho, most this site knows youre full of s*** anyways most of the time, and its the reason you have no one to talk to too that you are now reclusing and getting mad about anyone being social on a public social forum :)

Water Giver

1y

whoops uh oh guys, looks like @Zackbrah went ghost again, as usual when he's confronted with reality. thats okay tho - i'll let them know some of the list anyways. long read, but he want to lie on me like how he lies on topics with such authority :)

things zak has been proven to be wrong on:

• thinking every legend rapper has to be "battle tested" as a made up slight to kendrick even saying that is the only smudge to kendrick never being a GOAT - even tho legends like DMX, Andre 3000, Snoop DOg and more have never been an actual Rap beef (although dmx did do some actual battle rapping before he got signed). which is abvious wrong and a made up criteria. which few later i guess kendrick did end up pretty battle tested anyways. even trying to pull the "real hiphop" card even tho he doesnt talk about nay rap outside of kendrick, drake and kanye and is mostly a pop fan. zak ignores any mention of this now.

• doesnt know how number projections work. the most basic of understanding data growth and is regularly used in music. he fought for his ever dear life about number and chart projections against I and other in my NLU thread. even having a mini meltdown. and i even told him number projections are literally bascially always right with only a few thousands of an error. he tried to deny this literal statistical fact (you cant get more factual than literal data points and data growth). and now in present, wow what do you know, I and others were right and those chart n number projections about it becoming the biggest srap song of the streaming era is right. zak ignores any mention of this now.

• wrong about how bots work on spotify (and other major platforms) and their threshold. claiming spotify cannot detect bots easily. wrong again, spotify lets low numbers of bots through because it doesnt mean much. it is easy to get away with 10,000 bots, but hard to get away with 100,000 bots. which that "100,000" bots would affect them poorly with advertisers, money payout and THEIR DEALINGS WITH OTHER LABELS (like Sony or Warner) that would pull out from them if they show favoritism, and its why the bot scammers keep a low threshold of bots to keep their infinite money glitch working.

Which then users posted to him times when spotify has literally stopped major at once botting, and has stopped other tactics of "cheating" from a tists as well such as having the volume on 0 with repeats, or static/blank songs. which then spotify released their own paper on how they go about things, has been proven in court, and for something like NLU to get gigantic amount of streams that make it the #1 oat would easily blow up their bot detector and would strain their relationship with other labels and advertisers. even tho many have said even outside spotify that this is true with a paper trail history, he now ignores this. while the only one on "his side" is akademiks and the rando ig user he dug out. i also work with indie artists that have to deal with these games, so this one is more of a personal experience as well.

that is just a few things he has been majorly wrong on.

its okay tho, most this site knows youre full of s*** anyways most of the time, and its the reason you have no one to talk to too that you are now reclusing and getting mad about anyone being social on a public social forum :)

Stankie

1y

No one is reading this man plz go outside

Orangutan

1y

I just fed it to Grok and had her make a summary

atthepyramids

1y

hi

BM_

1y

Why did @ryder used to have a serial killer as his name?

doot doot

1y

It was performance art

Orangutan

1y

I just fed it to Grok and had her make a summary

crolivia chow

1y

summary: annoying poster thinks he washed another annoying poster

Water Giver

1y

whoops uh oh guys, looks like @Zackbrah went ghost again, as usual when he's confronted with reality. thats okay tho - i'll let them know some of the list anyways. long read, but he want to lie on me like how he lies on topics with such authority :)

things zak has been proven to be wrong on:

• thinking every legend rapper has to be "battle tested" as a made up slight to kendrick even saying that is the only smudge to kendrick never being a GOAT - even tho legends like DMX, Andre 3000, Snoop DOg and more have never been an actual Rap beef (although dmx did do some actual battle rapping before he got signed). which is abvious wrong and a made up criteria. which few later i guess kendrick did end up pretty battle tested anyways. even trying to pull the "real hiphop" card even tho he doesnt talk about nay rap outside of kendrick, drake and kanye and is mostly a pop fan. zak ignores any mention of this now.

• doesnt know how number projections work. the most basic of understanding data growth and is regularly used in music. he fought for his ever dear life about number and chart projections against I and other in my NLU thread. even having a mini meltdown. and i even told him number projections are literally bascially always right with only a few thousands of an error. he tried to deny this literal statistical fact (you cant get more factual than literal data points and data growth). and now in present, wow what do you know, I and others were right and those chart n number projections about it becoming the biggest srap song of the streaming era is right. zak ignores any mention of this now.

• wrong about how bots work on spotify (and other major platforms) and their threshold. claiming spotify cannot detect bots easily. wrong again, spotify lets low numbers of bots through because it doesnt mean much. it is easy to get away with 10,000 bots, but hard to get away with 100,000 bots. which that "100,000" bots would affect them poorly with advertisers, money payout and THEIR DEALINGS WITH OTHER LABELS (like Sony or Warner) that would pull out from them if they show favoritism, and its why the bot scammers keep a low threshold of bots to keep their infinite money glitch working.

Which then users posted to him times when spotify has literally stopped major at once botting, and has stopped other tactics of "cheating" from a tists as well such as having the volume on 0 with repeats, or static/blank songs. which then spotify released their own paper on how they go about things, has been proven in court, and for something like NLU to get gigantic amount of streams that make it the #1 oat would easily blow up their bot detector and would strain their relationship with other labels and advertisers. even tho many have said even outside spotify that this is true with a paper trail history, he now ignores this. while the only one on "his side" is akademiks and the rando ig user he dug out. i also work with indie artists that have to deal with these games, so this one is more of a personal experience as well.

that is just a few things he has been majorly wrong on.

its okay tho, most this site knows youre full of s*** anyways most of the time, and its the reason you have no one to talk to too that you are now reclusing and getting mad about anyone being social on a public social forum :)

Mark Moschino

1y

can u fill me in on top 5?

At first i thought he meant

Mt.Dew, Dr Pepsi, Sprite, Orange soda, diet coke, and fruit punch

scHoolboy Oward

1y

i just s*** everywhere

scHoolboy Oward

1y

i just s*** everywhere

BM_

1y

Love daddy day care

Stankie

1y

No one is reading this man plz go outside

Orangutan

1y

I just fed it to Grok and had her make a summary

NobodyWins

1y

Almost have 6000 career kills in battlefield