chill out on Safe man
The explanation was logical, and dude got banned anyway.
Suns in 6
@safe trust me if it looks like we're not trying to help someone understand that probably just means they don't want to understand, I'm always down to answer questions and explain things to people who actually wanna learn to get past stereotypical ideas etc. But at some point you can just guess who's really trying to learn and who's just hopeless
this has 0 to do w any of what happened bro
hes banned but engage w me properly about this as a whole because I wanna know your actual thoughts on whether people should be able to discuss "controversial" topics if their intention is actual discourse or not
I know you'll probably respond w something like someones rights aren't a controversial topic and trust me I 100% agree but like it or not for a lot of people thats not the case and I dont see how things can truly progress without at least trying to help people like that understand that exact message
i agree w/ ur perspective. imagining a mod pov i can see how it'd be tuff to differentiate intention of actual discourse vs intention of inciting/trolling ppl. mby that's easy to tell upon reading an OP, but i'd say the line can get pretty muddy very quickly
That post was longer than average! I had to scroll more than average to see the next posts below it!
Buxks in 6
Warriors in 10
f*** bron bron
Ima be real yall
I dont want basketball
I cant name a single player on any of these teams