rvi

5y

Bowie was a protagonist of his times, although a poor musician: to say that Bowie is a musician is like saying that Nero was a harp player (a fact that is technically true, but misleading). Bowie embodies the quintessence of artificial art, raises futulity to paradigm, focuses on the phenomenon rather than the content, makes irrelevant the relevant, and, thus, is the epitome of everything that went wrong with rock music.

Maximus

5y

(lorde era)

Bad Finger Boogie

5y

first one was way better imo and it ain't even close

wes

5y

don't like this pic

DEL634

5y

My Bloody Valentine are ass too.

Jerry Electricity

5y

You try ingesting nothing but cocaine, milk and peppers and see what your life is like

Q3D

5y

Huh

QrOv

5y

Midye west after dinda flop

ROBO DOG

5y

bout to spark up an ol' bleezy and let this beats commercial ride

rvi

5y

Reading the chronicles of his times, it is clear that what caused sensation was the show, not the music. The show that Bowie set up was undoubtedly in sync with the avantgarde, as it fused theater, mime, cinema, visual art, literature and music. However, Bowie merely recycled what had been going on for years in the British underground, in particular what had been popularized by the psychedelic bands of 1967. And he turned it into a commodity: whichever way you look at his oeuvre, this is the real merit of it.

AnselmoCdtt

5y

lorde is alright lmao

Q3D

5y

David bowie, aphex twin, Marvin Gaye

wolves

5y

im no longer sorry