Why do people deny that having more tracks on an album generally results in higher first-week sales, at least up to a certain point?
An album length of 20 to 23 tracks seems to be the ideal for maximizing streams, adding more than this often leads to diminishing returns
The success of Sour and GNX does not invalidate this clear trend
Why do people deny that having more tracks on an album generally results in higher first-week sales, at least up to a certain point?
An album length of 20 to 23 tracks seems to be the ideal for maximizing streams, adding more than this often leads to diminishing returns
The success of Sour and GNX does not invalidate this clear trend
Because niggas are coping with the fact that GNX performed as well as it did for only being 12 tracks
Highest first week streams for a “short album” ever, btw.
Lead financial a***yst for Billboard explaining why longer albums have a sales advantage:
https://www.billboard.com/pro/longer-albums-in-the-streaming-age/ and with statistics:
“The average number of tracks on studio albums in the top 10 of year-end Billboard 200 albums chart increased from 13.2 in 2014 to 19.1 in 2022. With about six more tracks came an additional 18 minutes of music. When Fleetwood Mac's Rumours topped the year-end chart in 1977, the average top 10 album had 10.3 tracks and ran just 45.1 minutes.”
If that’s not enough for you, here’s one from a global music industry reporter for Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/sites/hughmcintyre/2017/08/17/how-longer-albums-and-streaming-giants-are-manipulating-the-charts/
« If one listener sticks around for all 22 songs on Drake’s latest album, they have added more plays to the total than if the record (or playlist project or mixtape) a was only 10 songs long. It only takes just over 68 people to listen to Drake’s new release to count as one “sale,” whereas a 10-song collection would require 150 people to stick with it all the way through.»
Tldr: Kendrick won
I mean duh after he beefed w the biggest music artist in the world and the one who revived his career quick no s*** it was expected to drop these numbers bro and break records come on now
Highest first week streams for a “short album” ever, btw.
Lead financial a***yst for Billboard explaining why longer albums have a sales advantage:
https://www.billboard.com/pro/longer-albums-in-the-streaming-age/ and with statistics:
“The average number of tracks on studio albums in the top 10 of year-end Billboard 200 albums chart increased from 13.2 in 2014 to 19.1 in 2022. With about six more tracks came an additional 18 minutes of music. When Fleetwood Mac's Rumours topped the year-end chart in 1977, the average top 10 album had 10.3 tracks and ran just 45.1 minutes.”
If that’s not enough for you, here’s one from a global music industry reporter for Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/sites/hughmcintyre/2017/08/17/how-longer-albums-and-streaming-giants-are-manipulating-the-charts/
« If one listener sticks around for all 22 songs on Drake’s latest album, they have added more plays to the total than if the record (or playlist project or mixtape) a was only 10 songs long. It only takes just over 68 people to listen to Drake’s new release to count as one “sale,” whereas a 10-song collection would require 150 people to stick with it all the way through.»
Tldr: Kendrick won
Cook these dumbasses
Why do people deny that having more tracks on an album generally results in higher first-week sales, at least up to a certain point?
An album length of 20 to 23 tracks seems to be the ideal for maximizing streams, adding more than this often leads to diminishing returns
The success of Sour and GNX does not invalidate this clear trend
If GNX was a 24 track album do you think you would’ve spent twice as much time listening to new Kendrick music last week?
If GNX was a 24 track album do you think you would’ve spent twice as much time listening to new Kendrick music last week?
Not exactly twice down to the digit, but the streams definitely would’ve been higher. Niggas in the industry literally explained how it works and you’re still in denial about it
Not exactly twice down to the digit, but the streams definitely would’ve been higher. Niggas in the industry literally explained how it works and you’re still in denial about it
GNX definitely would've sold over 400k with like 21 tracks lol thats not even a discussion worth
Statistics show clearly that - when you're popular - you make more sales when you're dropping projects with many tracks
If GNX was a 24 track album do you think you would’ve spent twice as much time listening to new Kendrick music last week?
I get what you’re trying to say, but your argument misses a broader trend
Longer albums often result in more overall streams, not just because of individual listening habits but due to how streaming platforms work. More tracks mean more chances for songs to get added to playlists, recommended in algorithms, or replayed individually. It’s less about any one person doubling their listening time and more about aggregate streams increasing across all listeners
For example, if ‘GNX’ were 24 tracks, some songs might appeal to different subsets of listeners, expanding its reach and replay value. And even if you personally wouldn’t listen to the album twice as much, others might return to their favorite tracks more often, boosting the total
GNX definitely would've sold over 400k with like 21 tracks lol thats not even a discussion worth
Statistics show clearly that - when you're popular - you make more sales when you're dropping projects with many tracks
Statistics don’t show that
Statistics don’t show that
Of course they do dumb f***, you're just trying to be petty for no reason
I get what you’re trying to say, but your argument misses a broader trend
Longer albums often result in more overall streams, not just because of individual listening habits but due to how streaming platforms work. More tracks mean more chances for songs to get added to playlists, recommended in algorithms, or replayed individually. It’s less about any one person doubling their listening time and more about aggregate streams increasing across all listeners
For example, if ‘GNX’ were 24 tracks, some songs might appeal to different subsets of listeners, expanding its reach and replay value. And even if you personally wouldn’t listen to the album twice as much, others might return to their favorite tracks more often, boosting the total
Major playlists don’t add more than 3-4 songs from a single album to the same playlist. And unless he decided to include a country song on the album, just adding more tacks isn’t going to get him added to more playlists than he currently is. What types of songs do you think GNX is missing to appeal to people that aren’t already listening to the album?
I get what you’re trying to say, but your argument misses a broader trend
Longer albums often result in more overall streams, not just because of individual listening habits but due to how streaming platforms work. More tracks mean more chances for songs to get added to playlists, recommended in algorithms, or replayed individually. It’s less about any one person doubling their listening time and more about aggregate streams increasing across all listeners
For example, if ‘GNX’ were 24 tracks, some songs might appeal to different subsets of listeners, expanding its reach and replay value. And even if you personally wouldn’t listen to the album twice as much, others might return to their favorite tracks more often, boosting the total
This is exactly what I explained to him the other day and he still didn’t get it
Major playlists don’t add more than 3-4 songs from a single album to the same playlist. And unless he decided to include a country song on the album, just adding more tacks isn’t going to get him added to more playlists than he currently is. What types of songs do you think GNX is missing to appeal to people that aren’t already listening to the album?
This doesn’t matter. Any track has the potential to be someone’s favorite, it’s all subjective.
He could’ve added 7 more West Coast rap songs and all of them would’ve resulted in more overall streams for the album
If GNX was a 24 track album do you think you would’ve spent twice as much time listening to new Kendrick music last week?
Yes
Latest Spotify US charts posted. Only 3 Kendrick songs in the top 10. Christmas takeover officially begins.
https://charts.spotify.com/charts/view/regional-us-daily/latest
UMG streams stopped after the tracking week?
If GNX was a 24 track album do you think you would’ve spent twice as much time listening to new Kendrick music last week?
That’s not what the point of the padded album is for in regards to streaming for first week numbers!!!
Major playlists don’t add more than 3-4 songs from a single album to the same playlist. And unless he decided to include a country song on the album, just adding more tacks isn’t going to get him added to more playlists than he currently is. What types of songs do you think GNX is missing to appeal to people that aren’t already listening to the album?
You’re correct that major playlists typically feature only a few songs from the same album, but playlists are just one piece of the puzzle
Songs also get pushed through algorithmic features like ‘Discover Weekly and even autoplay as well
What it basically comes down to is… Having more tracks increases the chances for individual songs to perform well on their own, whether through playlists, algorithmic features or through fans gravitating toward and replaying their personal favorites
Even if most listeners focus on a handful of tracks, a longer album provides more opportunities for standout songs to emerge, driving up total streams
As for appealing to people who aren’t already listening, it’s not necessarily about adding a country song or drastically changing genres. Even within Kendrick’s existing style, more tracks could explore different moods, topics, or sounds that resonate with different subsets of listeners. For example, some people might gravitate toward introspective tracks, others to hype ones. A longer album could cater to more niches within the audience Kendrick already has—and possibly even bring in new ones
You’re correct that major playlists typically feature only a few songs from the same album, but playlists are just one piece of the puzzle
Songs also get pushed through algorithmic features like ‘Discover Weekly and even autoplay as well
What it basically comes down to is… Having more tracks increases the chances for individual songs to perform well on their own, whether through playlists, algorithmic features or through fans gravitating toward and replaying their personal favorites
Even if most listeners focus on a handful of tracks, a longer album provides more opportunities for standout songs to emerge, driving up total streams
As for appealing to people who aren’t already listening, it’s not necessarily about adding a country song or drastically changing genres. Even within Kendrick’s existing style, more tracks could explore different moods, topics, or sounds that resonate with different subsets of listeners. For example, some people might gravitate toward introspective tracks, others to hype ones. A longer album could cater to more niches within the audience Kendrick already has—and possibly even bring in new ones
It's a zero-sum game though. You mentioned the algorithmic features like Discover Weekly and Autoplay. If those features decide to queue up one song it comes at expense of every other song. And since songs from GNX are all likely to be categorized very similarly by the algorithms, additional tracks being pushed by those features means the existing GNX tracks being promoted less.
If GNX was a 24 track album do you think you would’ve spent twice as much time listening to new Kendrick music last week?
Yes!
niche west coast mix tape LMAO
with 2 SZA fts, a top 5 artist of this decade
your post doesn't disprove what I said. What does does having SZA featured have to do with this being a west coast album with west coast music/artists/vibes.
UMG streams stopped after the tracking week?
I'm shocked the album lost so many streams on a Friday but hey, at least that counts for week 2, not week 1.