dweeb

Why did it take 78 days for them to withdraw and agree to end the killings?

Must have been determined to do it

Finding this out was my red pill moment

Man I feel for everybody that got their country f***ed up by somebody else

Like if u mess up your own country then I can't feel bad for u

But these powerhouses really be in our internal business

North africa, middle east, balkans (to a lesser extent cause it ain't a all-out conflict)

You're acting like they were killing people for fun and not in a military conflict against a secessionist movement

I'll say 78 days of fighting is a lot less than whatever Ukraine is doing to prevent secession, but that's okay because NATO good

You took the Afghanistan pill

Now take the Yugoslavia pill

@TragedyGhaddafi

They were going to exterminate Albanians on thr flimsy grounds of them being linked to said organisation

If you've tried to do it twice already it's probably you'll do it again

Enough was enough

@Scratchin_Bandit U in Ethiopia livin there?

Just saying that it was gonna happen a lot of times doesn't make it true you know

US really is the cancer on Earth

Nahh i live in the Netherlands but i still got a lot of family over there

I see the common sense has flown out of the f***ing window

Wonder what the Albanians think...

U don't even know what UÇK is doing in Macedonia to this day with their sub 20% population exercising their rights while Macedonians have to eat their s*** so they don't seem "genocidal and xenophobic" to western eyes & media while losing a lot in the process. Meanwhile UÇK erected a long ass statue commemorating terrorists in the 2001 attacks

So imagine this^^^^^^ in a bigger scale in Kosovo and what more we don't know

Common sense right

What's next citing NATOpedia? Plankton getting to u

F*** does this have to do with kosovo

You set, I'm in Germany 9-10 months a year cause I work there but I'm in the Balkans rn

Alright

Genocide is bad and preventing them is good. Sorry about what's going on in Macedonia but no involvement would have been a completed genocide

In your view what was the reason or precedent for NATO themselves to intervene to the extent they did? Not just “Serbia was doing bad things”, like specifically what invoked a direct NATO intervention

I understand I don't mean to argue with u brother

ukraine parallel is so off. just shows how you're out of touch with the events happened there. once again

If we're being real, it was probably the fact they didn't want to be dealing with another fee Srebrenicas and the fallout from that. That's not to say 'serbia was doing bad things' but NATO states had an interest in preventing the refugee flows and displacement

Yes, this is a motive aside from simply doing the right thing. But enough was enough. Even If the intentions were self interested, the outcome was a prevented genocide

Powerful

My serb vro been telling me i should come visit some time

Nothing's gonna happen here let's stop arguing