does not surprise me lmao
anyone who thinks this is a new concept or that trans existence is new is brainwashed by colonialism
must wish them the best
The Quran itself acknowledges humanity beyond two genders
A book from thousands of years ago written by Warlords that is now twisted by Islamic dominant countries to persecute minorities of all aspects
The a***ysis reveals that being transgender is a natural occurrence and the Qur’ān unequivocally acknowledges the existence of transgender people (Qur’an, 42: 49–50).
(42:49) The dominion of the heavens and the earth belongs to Allah.76 He creates whatever He pleases. He grants females to whomever He pleases and males to whomever He pleases, (42:50) or grants them a mix of males and females, and causes whomever He pleases to be barren. He is All- Knowing, All-Powerful
I’m really trying to understand what you mean. Are you saying like for example, instead of saying women, I say b****es in reference to them? Which is disrespectful and dehumanizing.
That is what me referring to some trans women as “women with d***s” would be equivalent to? Am I comprehending that correctly?
do you call cishet women "women with vaginas" in regular conversation?
again;
tell 20 people trans women are women
tell 20 people /why/ trans women are women, how gender and sexuality work, build the foundations of that argument
tell me which one is more likely to elicit change
and when appeals to logic doesn't work (cause historically it never has) what happens next chairman?
and when appeals to logic doesn't work (cause historically it never has) what happens next chairman?
Protracted people's war
Protracted people's war
tryna get people to connect the dots that this was what a certain demographic had to do in the 60s because "building foundations of that argument" didn't move the needle not once lol.
do you call cishet women "women with vaginas" in regular conversation?
So we're dancing around the differences? There was a time when referring to women where it would be innocuous, but now that isn't so much the case.
So we're dancing around the differences? There was a time when referring to women where it would be innocuous, but now that isn't so much the case.
yes or no question my guy. lol.
minimizing ANYONE of any gender, class, race, etc to what's between their legs is dehumanizing and legit does nothing to show that you are open to a conversation around why trans women are still women bro.
tryna get people to connect the dots that this was what a certain demographic had to do in the 60s because "building foundations of that argument" didn't move the needle not once lol.
I'm all for political action that goes beyond words if u catch my drift but i think it's worth explaining theoretical concepts in an easy and accessible way for people who could be open to changing their mind on something for the better
Of course nobody is obliged to do this
yes or no question my guy. lol.
minimizing ANYONE of any gender, class, race, etc to what's between their legs is dehumanizing and legit does nothing to show that you are open to a conversation around why trans women are still women bro.
I have made reference to women by their body parts, yes. I still do when engaging in barbershop talk from time to time.
I'm all for political action that goes beyond words if u catch my drift but i think it's worth explaining theoretical concepts in an easy and accessible way for people who could be open to changing their mind on something for the better
Of course nobody is obliged to do this
And all I'm saying is...shit's been done.
There are l&a threads from months/years ago around trans athletes and other trans relate content where trans users of this site have tried to talk and give legit advice to users that didn't understand just to get called names and be dismissed regardless of those acts of appealing to logic lol.
Like you said, nobody is obliged to do that sort of work. It's tiring and as a person of color it can be downright draining to have to somehow validate your existence to someone who aint even tryna listen to anything u sayin cause they mind was made up before niggas even started talking.
I have made reference to women by their body parts, yes. I still do when engaging in barbershop talk from time to time.
and in most cases in this society that we live in, that would be looked down upon
but we know that cause women talk about feeling dehumanized all the time.
So once again, when you say "chicks with d***s" when referring to trans women, it makes anyone on the "trans acceptance" side less likely to want to engage in a conversation with you explaining the difference.
a f*** nigga that aint here no more thank god brought up autism in one of those threads during a conversation man like what you expect somebody to say in response to that
Women come with d***s now. That is crude, but hardly transphobic imo. Will you have people saying it in a condescending, tongue in cheek, sort of way? Absolutely, that don't make the statement untrue. You'd have to take context into account rather than sweeping such a broad thing as transphobic
Oh my lord
Women come with d***s now. That is crude, but hardly transphobic imo. Will you have people saying it in a condescending, tongue in cheek, sort of way? Absolutely, that don't make the statement untrue. You'd have to take context into account rather than sweeping such a broad thing as transphobic
So post-OP are women?
A classic example,
The Wachowskis are and were women.
So post-OP are women?
Even without surgery, or any gender affirming actions taken, they're women.
yall niggas got it bro. peace.
I wish American media wasn't so dead set on whitewashing everything LGBTQIA+ related. If more black LGBTQIA+ activists were highlighted and normalized like Marsha P. Johnson were talked about more growing up, black folks as a whole would be so much more understanding to these issues man.
But yall got it.
Even without surgery, or any gender affirming actions taken, they're women.
How do the biological women feel about this where the biological women of ktt