Literally Son had the worst season of his career before Ange came in and spurs fans werenât even sure of keeping Kulu on a permanent either.
Rashford had the worst season of his career before Ten Hag, pointless argument.
Iâm actually nostalgic for peak Ole ball
Unreal time
Ole was playing great until they forced Ronaldo down his throat and despite his goals he couldnât offer the necessary team cohesion in attack
Iâve reached the point where I want Ten Hag out, but donât let Conte s***ting the bed last season cloud you from how talented this Spurs team was supposed to be.
Ten Hag inherited the worse squad and, largely to his own fault, still has the worse squad.
When I looked at Tottenham squad at the start of the season I thought they were not finishing above 8th tbh
Thatâs probably because youâre used to Spurs sucking. But squad wise itâs easy to see which players are more fit and technical
what type of stats you looking at lil bro almost any important advance stats we all better than spurs chance creation shot creating action final third touch have more touch total
individual one all of our team take on more progressive carried,received more
Son is better than all of United attackers
Bissouma is better than Fred or McTominay
How are you coping by using weird unrelated stats to prove United players before Erik came in are better?
Was a trap
Of course Ange didnât inherit a better squad
Heâs also spent way less and been there for way shorter
Also got injuries etc. Heâs showing up eth almost weekly
No ball knowledge looks like:
If we played like Spurs and had the exact same point total as we have now I donât think people would be saying ETH out
obviously not.
Worst season of his career he scored more than Rashford Rangnick season and this season. He's definitely fallen off for some reason but he was a top attacker in the prem for years before that.
Would you rather have Antony than Kulusevski?
2 years ago? Antony.
not the pt at all. somehow be2ye said spurs had the better squad. that's all.
Son is better than all of United attackers
Bissouma is better than Fred or McTominay
How are you coping by using weird unrelated stats to prove United players before Erik came in are better?
ETH also spent 300 Million, you can't possibly defend ETH on this weird angle. this is insanity.
No ball knowledge looks like:
what ball knowledge go watch spurs and listen to Ange talk about p**** managers saying they can't play how they want cause they don't have the players they want.
he's a little bald b**** boy that belongs at clubs and leagues levels below England.
f***s sake go argue against poch/Chelsea. bringing Ange and Spurs into this is embarrassing for ETH more than he's done to himself this season already.
2 years ago? Antony.
not the pt at all. somehow be2ye said spurs had the better squad. that's all.
Yeah I don't agree with that but I'd take them two over Rashford and Anthony right now.
Although I would say that they're better suited to that style of play than our squad.
Yeah I don't agree with that but I'd take them two over Rashford and Anthony right now.
Although I would say that they're better suited to that style of play than our squad.
For sure. Iâd take Son over everyone except Haaland and Salah. Heâs a baller and a leader.
But he has gotten better through Ange especially playing new position. Ange is developing players over there, on a budget 1/6th our size.
Nobody can explain why Ange can build a culture, playing style, and results in 4 months.
Meanwhile weâre 1.5 years in and ETH is complaining every week about offsides and playing absolute dog s*** football.
The gap between Ange and ETH is same gap as Son to Bebe.
Was a trap
Of course Ange didnât inherit a better squad
Heâs also spent way less and been there for way shorter
Also got injuries etc. Heâs showing up eth almost weekly
Give it another 2 weeks and itâll be Emery inherited a better team at Villa
ETH also spent 300 Million, you can't possibly defend ETH on this weird angle. this is insanity.
Stop deflecting and accept my basic point: United was not a better squad than Spurs at their respective manager turnovers
United fans have no football insight outside of:
âLook this team plays better footballâ
âWhy is team X above us when they were below us last season/a decade agoâ
âWe always used to win now we play so badâ
âLook that is a better coach because they winâ
âWe suck, we should probably sack our managerâ
âWe should not lose to âXâ team, if we do, iâm team sack the managerâ
âSack the managerâ
âSack the shampoo he buysâ
Ole was playing great until they forced Ronaldo down his throat and despite his goals he couldnât offer the necessary team cohesion in attack
Yeah cos apart from Leeds before he came we played fantastic football the start of that season
Yeah cos apart from Leeds before he came we played fantastic football the start of that season
He needed an attacker but Ronaldo weighed a lot of the team down
Stop deflecting and accept my basic point: United was not a better squad than Spurs at their respective manager turnovers
he literally spent 300 f***ing million since he came here. if it wasn't better when he arrived, he could've made it as good. we could've had Brenan Johnson, Micky Van de Ven, Udogie etc.
instead we play miserable football, and have insane folks like you (really just you), defend ETH because of structure. f*** structure hes just a s*** leader.
United fans have no football insight outside of:
âLook this team plays better footballâ
âWhy is team X above us when they were below us last season/a decade agoâ
âWe always used to win now we play so badâ
âLook that is a better coach because they winâ
âWe suck, we should probably sack our managerâ
âWe should not lose to âXâ team, if we do, iâm team sack the managerâ
âSack the managerâ
âSack the shampoo he buysâ
As opposed to âthe manager is not responsible for the performances, results or the players he signed, itâs everybody elseâs fault. Heâll turn it around but I cant tell you whyâ
The club is a circus from the top but that doesnât mean the managers and players havenât been severely flawed and should be held accountable.
Give it another 2 weeks and itâll be Emery inherited a better team at Villa
I mean tbf Villa did have a solid squad, they were just managed awfully by Gerrard
When they sacked him right after a game and he had to ride the bus back like a bum
he literally spent 300 f***ing million since he came here. if it wasn't better when he arrived, he could've made it as good. we could've had Brenan Johnson, Micky Van de Ven, Udogie etc.
instead we play miserable football, and have insane folks like you (really just you), defend ETH because of structure. f*** structure hes just a s*** leader.
Again deflecting because you canât afford to be honest and admit my initial point stands and makes sense:
The initial United team ten Hag inherited was nowhere close to Angeâs well scouted and cohesive Spurs team
I will keep repeating for all you who wanna act like you have one up on me
Listen: never have i denied that ten Hag was not the right person to make transfer decisions, but i sure as hell donât trust the current Recruitment department either so i hardly can fault him for it
As opposed to âthe manager is not responsible for the performances, results or the players he signed, itâs everybody elseâs fault. Heâll turn it around but I cant tell you whyâ
The club is a circus from the top but that doesnât mean the managers and players havenât been severely flawed and should be held accountable.
Yikes, none of this is remotely what i believe
Ten Hag can be blamed for his ingame management and defeats.
What he canât be blamed for is a lack of a fit n healthy squad and strong enough players (mentally and physically) capable of technically executing his desired style of play. That is not his responsibility but that of the medical staff, the financial decisionmakers and recruiting/scout dept.