Lots of old artists do this. Leave nothing behind
Tarantino how can he say no directors are good into their old age while we got geezers running laps around him
I've been in a grim euro mood. Might revisit some Tark.
Slavic cinema is my ultimate blind spot, mostly cause they’re so long
Tarantino how can he say no directors are good into their old age while we got geezers running laps around him
Tarantino's weird
Tarantino how can he say no directors are good into their old age while we got geezers running laps around him
Did Tarantino really say this? I hope not, cause yikes
Did Tarantino really say this? I hope not, cause yikes
No that’s not exactly what he said. He was talking about how he’s seen many filmmakers sort of lose their passion after a certain age and he personally doesn’t want to fall into that so he’s limiting himself. He was talking about how he’s noticed that some of them after a certain point become sort of reflective on filmmaking itself rather than adding to their legacy with a new contribution to the canon. He’s sort of OCD, he likes a clean and concise filmography. This all started when he was talking about how he wasn’t interested seeing Scorsese in old age make films about Howard Hughes and stuff like that, but he also recently had The Irishman as his favorite film of 2019 and did an interview with Scorsese where he was excited that he was still working and making great films. Elric is just being a baby and exaggerating his point as a cheap dunk because the climax of Tarantino’s last film made him uncomfortable.
Also restoring ones from totally random countries that are at high risk to be lost forever doing God's work
Marty living the life of any cinehead, but with suitcases of cash to preserve the arts in respect of filmmakers to get their flowers and for future generations not to be deprived of anything in the medium which is basically fundamentally putting more food on the table for film nerds to indulge in.
plus him chopping the meat off Renaldo and Clara and basically gave us the fever dream of Rolling Thunder to see Dylan at his pomp in 4K. Forever in debt to a dap and rep
Also what happened to that movie about the serial killer who targeted people at the worlds fair.
No that’s not exactly what he said. He was talking about how he’s seen many filmmakers sort of lose their passion after a certain age and he personally doesn’t want to fall into that so he’s limiting himself. He was talking about how he’s noticed that some of them after a certain point become sort of reflective on filmmaking itself rather than adding to their legacy with a new contribution to the canon. He’s sort of OCD, he likes a clean and concise filmography. This all started when he was talking about how he wasn’t interested seeing Scorsese in old age make films about Howard Hughes and stuff like that, but he also recently had The Irishman as his favorite film of 2019 and did an interview with Scorsese where he was excited that he was still working and making great films. Elric is just being a baby and exaggerating his point as a cheap dunk because the climax of Tarantino’s last film made him uncomfortable.
That context is tad less wild, but it still seems like an overexaggerated angle. There are so many well known, late-career directors that don't fit his claim — and more than a few who Tarantino is known for loving.
Can you link where he makes these comments? I wanna see what all he says. Cause i want to know if he's really implying that "reflections on filmmaking itself" aren't worthy of adding to a filmmaker's legacy, and his justification for that (if he gives one). It's also an odd thing to hear Tarantino of all people say, since most of his work are reflections on filmmaking itself by proxy of his particular fanaticisms in film culture.
That context is tad less wild, but it still seems like an overexaggerated angle. There are so many well known, late-career directors that don't fit his claim — and more than a few who Tarantino is known for loving.
Can you link where he makes these comments? I wanna see what all he says. Cause i want to know if he's really implying that "reflections on filmmaking itself" aren't worthy of adding to a filmmaker's legacy, and his justification for that (if he gives one). It's also an odd thing to hear Tarantino of all people say, since most of his work are reflections on filmmaking itself by proxy of his particular fanaticisms in film culture.
It’s really hard to find one single interview or clip where he talks about this cause it’s from various things. I’ll try to find it though.
It’s really hard to find one single interview or clip where he talks about this cause it’s from various things. I’ll try to find it though.
Preciate it
Preciate it
I’m pretty sure the origin of this is in that first Oscar directors round table thing from 2012. The most recent comments were on an appearance he did last year on Bill Maher’s show. Even if he thinks they make good stuff in old age, I think he’s talking about a certain kind of passion. He’s looking it at like a rockstar with a great string of records who just drops the mic and walks off forever.
I’m pretty sure the origin of this is in that first Oscar directors round table thing from 2012. The most recent comments were on an appearance he did last year on Bill Maher’s show. Even if he thinks they make good stuff in old age, I think he’s talking about a certain kind of passion. He’s looking it at like a rockstar with a great string of records who just drops the mic and walks off forever.
I'll look em up and get back to ya
No that’s not exactly what he said. He was talking about how he’s seen many filmmakers sort of lose their passion after a certain age and he personally doesn’t want to fall into that so he’s limiting himself. He was talking about how he’s noticed that some of them after a certain point become sort of reflective on filmmaking itself rather than adding to their legacy with a new contribution to the canon. He’s sort of OCD, he likes a clean and concise filmography. This all started when he was talking about how he wasn’t interested seeing Scorsese in old age make films about Howard Hughes and stuff like that, but he also recently had The Irishman as his favorite film of 2019 and did an interview with Scorsese where he was excited that he was still working and making great films. Elric is just being a baby and exaggerating his point as a cheap dunk because the climax of Tarantino’s last film made him uncomfortable.
I've heard him say straight up nobody has more than ten classics in them he's not as artful with his reasoning as you're trying to imply
That context is tad less wild, but it still seems like an overexaggerated angle. There are so many well known, late-career directors that don't fit his claim — and more than a few who Tarantino is known for loving.
Can you link where he makes these comments? I wanna see what all he says. Cause i want to know if he's really implying that "reflections on filmmaking itself" aren't worthy of adding to a filmmaker's legacy, and his justification for that (if he gives one). It's also an odd thing to hear Tarantino of all people say, since most of his work are reflections on filmmaking itself by proxy of his particular fanaticisms in film culture.
Here's one
Fitting cause Leo approaching Errol territory
Eddie G in The Sea Wolf or maybe Charles Laughton in Mutiny on the Bounty
Eddie G in The Sea Wolf or maybe Charles Laughton in Mutiny on the Bounty
Struggling to find a good version of that mutiny for years
just finished the book
Marty got one with this
I imagine it's gonna be expensive af so hopefully he has no problem convincing Apple to give him the bag. will be interesting from a storytelling perspective to see how he tells the different narratives. can't wait to see what they do for the rest of the casting
Even though I was in first page, I’m in again because I forgot about it. GET THIS STRIKE OVER WITH NOW!!!!