Reply
  • shaleirose

    He's one of their most popular characters and has a huge game coming out next month. I doubt that they'd sideline him for too much longer.

    If he's not in the first X-Men film then he'll probably get a solo film to introduce him like @Mac_Wit_Da_Cheese said. I think that would be a better approach honestly. Treat him how they treat Spider-Man & the Avengers: Let him get the spotlight in his own solo trilogy and then have him as a supporting role in the ensemble films where he's not taking too much shine away from the rest of the cast

    Damn I posted before seeing this. Basically said the same thing lol

  • Unity 💯
    Aug 15
    ·
    4 replies

    Taking a Marvel role for your second movie is like making an OnlyFans when you turn 18

    You didn't even try to go legit

  • Aug 15
    ·
    2 replies

    I read an interesting idea online for introducing Wolverine which in concept I like but at the same time I don't think Marvel would do this

    Introduce your Wolverine in a Disney+ show that covers his past season by season

    So Season 1 could be his true origin, 2 can cover WWII, 3 cover Vietnam, etc.

    Include him in the present day X-Men films but don't hinder on the show for his story telling in the films.

  • Aug 15
    ·
    1 reply
    Unity

    Taking a Marvel role for your second movie is like making an OnlyFans when you turn 18

    You didn't even try to go legit

    Let's not act like her last major project before Obsession wasn't 4 seasons on a CW Superman show

  • Aug 15
    ·
    1 reply
    shaleirose

    He's one of their most popular characters and has a huge game coming out next month. I doubt that they'd sideline him for too much longer.

    If he's not in the first X-Men film then he'll probably get a solo film to introduce him like @Mac_Wit_Da_Cheese said. I think that would be a better approach honestly. Treat him how they treat Spider-Man & the Avengers: Let him get the spotlight in his own solo trilogy and then have him as a supporting role in the ensemble films where he's not taking too much shine away from the rest of the cast

    Wolverine has been in so many things for past 20 years . Give it a rest then he in doomsday and secret wars always same actor . Really marvel likely steered Wolverine away from using x men lol Sony not in control of encouraging Disney to use Wolverine to sell their game .

  • Unity 💯
    Aug 15
    mjpplus

    Let's not act like her last major project before Obsession wasn't 4 seasons on a CW Superman show

    I don't engage with superhero content so I wouldn't know that

  • Unity 💯
    Aug 15

    But I did say movie anyway not project

  • Aug 15
    shaleirose

    And you thinking she was average in Obsession is your opinion, which you are well within your right to have.

    But to write off the casting as "online d*** riding" because of her breakout is just nonsensical; actors have breakthrough performances and then start getting more eyes on them for bigger roles, that's just how the industry works

    To each their own!

  • Aug 15
    ·
    1 reply
    mjpplus

    I read an interesting idea online for introducing Wolverine which in concept I like but at the same time I don't think Marvel would do this

    Introduce your Wolverine in a Disney+ show that covers his past season by season

    So Season 1 could be his true origin, 2 can cover WWII, 3 cover Vietnam, etc.

    Include him in the present day X-Men films but don't hinder on the show for his story telling in the films.

    Coy Jandraeu?

    It's a solid idea, but the problem is:

    1. Wolverine is way too popular of a character to be limited to television

    2. Marvel is moving away from live-action Disney+ shows with the exception of Daredevil

    I think Wolverine will most likely get his own trilogy that runs concurrently with the X-Men films

  • Aug 15
    ·
    1 reply
    Unity

    Taking a Marvel role for your second movie is like making an OnlyFans when you turn 18

    You didn't even try to go legit

    What is "going legit" in this scenario

  • Aug 15
    ·
    1 reply
    Mac Wit Da Cheese

    Wolverine probably their biggest character next to Spidey and Iron Man. He’ll for sure get a solo at some point

    Maybe it’ll be after he’s introduced in x-men but I thought they might try to do his origin story since it wasn’t done that great with Fox. I also think they may give other members solo movies before joining the team kinda like how they did with Avengers to build hype for X-Men movies as a team up movie

    Hugh Hackman Wolverine yes a new comer ? F*** no what are yall smoking . They have to step in the shoes Hugh jackman was in 25 years. Consistently in games and movies and they told Logan full story . I get it he will be back but give it some tome

  • Aug 15
    mjpplus

    I read an interesting idea online for introducing Wolverine which in concept I like but at the same time I don't think Marvel would do this

    Introduce your Wolverine in a Disney+ show that covers his past season by season

    So Season 1 could be his true origin, 2 can cover WWII, 3 cover Vietnam, etc.

    Include him in the present day X-Men films but don't hinder on the show for his story telling in the films.

    Tv show better than a movie for him cause big budget movie side piece of x men risk him over shadowing them again like the first time

  • Aug 15
    ·
    1 reply
    shaleirose

    Coy Jandraeu?

    It's a solid idea, but the problem is:

    1. Wolverine is way too popular of a character to be limited to television

    2. Marvel is moving away from live-action Disney+ shows with the exception of Daredevil

    I think Wolverine will most likely get his own trilogy that runs concurrently with the X-Men films

    I think that's who talked about it yeah

    Again, I'm not sure if they would even consider it, but I think just in this marketplace of superhero content more or less taking a step back I think that would work instead of doing more movies and possibly pushing it to 3-4 films per year

    Like I also don't want 5 years between X-Men movies

  • Aug 15
    Unity

    Taking a Marvel role for your second movie is like making an OnlyFans when you turn 18

    You didn't even try to go legit

    Her second movie is invertigo man you can at least look up her IMDb .

  • Aug 15
    ·
    1 reply

    If Wolverine gets his own trilogy they learned nothing from past mistakes

  • Dope casting for storm and rogue

    Never heard of the rest, casting younger was shrewd

  • Aug 15
    ·
    1 reply
    HaroldsChicken

    Wolverine has been in so many things for past 20 years . Give it a rest then he in doomsday and secret wars always same actor . Really marvel likely steered Wolverine away from using x men lol Sony not in control of encouraging Disney to use Wolverine to sell their game .

    I don't think the character needs to be put to the side completely. But what should happen is that he's not the focus of the X-Men mainline films, because the team is not just the Wolverine & Friends show

    If he's:

    • not in the first movie at all
    • gets a solo film in 2029/2030
    • is incorporated into the X-Men sequel
    • and then gets two of his own films for a trilogy

    I think that's a great way to weave him in without having him be the spotlight

  • Unity 💯
    Aug 15
    ·
    2 replies
    shaleirose

    What is "going legit" in this scenario

    Literally anything not superhero related

  • Aug 15

    We can’t get a blade solo movie but y’all talking Wolverine trilogy good lord

  • Aug 15
    ·
    1 reply
    HaroldsChicken

    If Wolverine gets his own trilogy they learned nothing from past mistakes

    ???

    Wolverine having a trilogy was not a mistake

    Wolverine being the main character of every mainline X-Men film from 2000-2014 was the mistake

  • Aug 15
    ·
    1 reply
    shaleirose

    I don't think the character needs to be put to the side completely. But what should happen is that he's not the focus of the X-Men mainline films, because the team is not just the Wolverine & Friends show

    If he's:

    • not in the first movie at all
    • gets a solo film in 2029/2030
    • is incorporated into the X-Men sequel
    • and then gets two of his own films for a trilogy

    I think that's a great way to weave him in without having him be the spotlight

    I don’t think he needs solo trilogy . That’s overkill and how they got to where they got to last time

  • Aug 15
    ·
    1 reply
    Unity

    Literally anything not superhero related

    Do y'all ever get tired of hating things

  • Obsession doesn’t work without the Nikki actress carrying it on her back, she made that movie

  • Aug 15

    I think they're gonna keep Dafne Keen as the Wolverine and Hugh as a mentor or something.

  • Aug 15
    ·
    2 replies
    shaleirose

    ???

    Wolverine having a trilogy was not a mistake

    Wolverine being the main character of every mainline X-Men film from 2000-2014 was the mistake

    Both are part of the same mistake because the solo movies were money and time talent that siphoned away from x men . Including x2 as a wolverine and friends movie . First class has no Wolverine and is also the best or second best x men movie better than everything but Logan by far