Aug 15·2 repliesCracks me up not even planning to ever play this yet spending your time in here crying about it
Aug 15·1 replyNobodyWinsCherrywhine001
“Having standards is lame!! Just eat the reheated slop and enjoy it bro” -NobodyWins, 2026
- Aug 15·1 replyCherrywine001
“Having standards is lame!! Just eat the reheated slop and enjoy it bro” -NobodyWins, 2026
Sorry I didn’t know you were rich like that and can’t enjoy leftovers
send some money my way bro 
Aug 15NobodyWinsCracks me up not even planning to ever play this yet spending your time in here crying about it
you literally have hated on from soft games including Elden ring and said it didnt deserve to win over a game that uses a simular formula to the games before it.
- Aug 15·1 replyNobodyWins
Sorry I didn’t know you were rich like that and can’t enjoy leftovers
send some money my way broThanksgiving and pasta leftovers only… keep all that other s***
- Aug 15·2 replies
Also difference between having standards and b****ing a marvel game looks like a marvel game lmfao
Did you want Wolverine to be first person or some s***? And with all the leaks they had to deal with…
Personally glad this seems to be hitting with critics and will be a success
- Aug 15Cherrywine001
Thanksgiving and pasta leftovers only… keep all that other s***
I’ll send you my cashapp and Venmo usernames
- Aug 15
You like this formula but there are formulas you dont like and have called the games all kinds of overrated/ been hyper critical of. People just have the formula they like and that they excuse.
- Aug 15NobodyWins
Also difference between having standards and b****ing a marvel game looks like a marvel game lmfao
Did you want Wolverine to be first person or some s***? And with all the leaks they had to deal with…
Personally glad this seems to be hitting with critics and will be a success
but the hitting with critics is part of what we are talking about. The critics are very much saying more of the same and its solid but with all these games coming out they arent in a rush to play more of the same. Again I posted greg miller preview who said he loved spider man 1, 2, god of war previews but this preview he was like okay cool will play when review time comes but not wowed. Is he b****ing for being honest or is he being honest and not making excuses
- Aug 15·1 reply
“Why is the game marketed for mass casual audiences NOT doing indie weird s***?!?”
- Aug 15NobodyWins
“Why is the game marketed for mass casual audiences NOT doing indie weird s***?!?”
that literally isnt what I am saying or previewers........
- Aug 15
Madden drops yearly and people give constructive criticism. This game took many years and is such a similar formula its going to get push back
- Aug 15·3 repliesNobodyWins
Also difference between having standards and b****ing a marvel game looks like a marvel game lmfao
Did you want Wolverine to be first person or some s***? And with all the leaks they had to deal with…
Personally glad this seems to be hitting with critics and will be a success
I wanted Wolverine to look visually interesting with visceral combat that doesn’t look bland. I wanted cinematic sections to look batshit crazy instead of just running through gunfire for 30 seconds. I want some creativity when it comes to fighting bosses instead of doing the same thing we’ve been doing for decades.
Maybe just give me some vision and a bit of creativity in my superhero video game?
Prototype did it. Wolverine 2009 did it. Arkham trilogy did it. GotG gameplay was pretty standard, but the writing was amazing to compensate and you can tell they poured their hearts into the game. Wolverine 2026 feels like a product.
- Aug 15Cherrywine001
I wanted Wolverine to look visually interesting with visceral combat that doesn’t look bland. I wanted cinematic sections to look batshit crazy instead of just running through gunfire for 30 seconds. I want some creativity when it comes to fighting bosses instead of doing the same thing we’ve been doing for decades.
Maybe just give me some vision and a bit of creativity in my superhero video game?
Prototype did it. Wolverine 2009 did it. Arkham trilogy did it. GotG gameplay was pretty standard, but the writing was amazing to compensate and you can tell they poured their hearts into the game. Wolverine 2026 feels like a product.
WHICH IS ALL THAT WE HAVE BEEN SAYING
- Aug 15·2 repliesCherrywine001
I wanted Wolverine to look visually interesting with visceral combat that doesn’t look bland. I wanted cinematic sections to look batshit crazy instead of just running through gunfire for 30 seconds. I want some creativity when it comes to fighting bosses instead of doing the same thing we’ve been doing for decades.
Maybe just give me some vision and a bit of creativity in my superhero video game?
Prototype did it. Wolverine 2009 did it. Arkham trilogy did it. GotG gameplay was pretty standard, but the writing was amazing to compensate and you can tell they poured their hearts into the game. Wolverine 2026 feels like a product.
Didn’t realize you played the whole game by bad bro! Also everyone who has actually played it is praising the story and said it’s good. I trust people who’ve actually played it over watching clips to be fair.
- Aug 15·1 reply
Also GotG writing was no better than Spiderman 1 or 2 lol and the gameplay was way worse.
- Aug 15HaroldsChicken
No one put a gun to their head to make a linear short set piece game 300 million dollars . They choose to do so . I’ve said this before and will say so again . Superhero and movie tie in games used to take risk and actually be on the forefront of the FUTURE of games . At least one hook . Less formulaic . Hulk ultimate destruction , matrix game , wolverine origins .
We know the budget high because the focus is just make a lot of money . Which spider man games have and this will . Many aren’t asking for an art house Wolverine game . It’s really have any hook at all that really makes you want to play it besides leaning on the ip and being the only dev that can even do a Wolverine game
If many game companies had opportunities to do hero games or use licenses we would see creativity and companies pushing themselves which we used to a larger degree. When it’s limited on who can or one game company keeps pumping out hero games . It’s okay for people to say it’s going through the motions on a 70$ game in a recession . They can handle the constructive criticism and even PlayStation fanboys are saying the same sentiments . I listened to the entire hour of kinda funny games and reading many previews
You don’t have to rush to defend the honor of the game company or the game made for 309 million that will sell like hot cakes .
Especially when I say it won’t be bad . To as i said it’s crazy to send Wolverine to previews but a month before launch have 11 minutes of phantom blade last week then 20 minutes this week totaling 31 minutes and likely an exclusive demo
I typed an entire essay and all nobody wins got out of it is things I didn’t say
- Aug 15NobodyWins
Didn’t realize you played the whole game by bad bro! Also everyone who has actually played it is praising the story and said it’s good. I trust people who’ve actually played it over watching clips to be fair.
NOT EVERYONE WHO PLAYED THE PREVIEWS IS PRAISING EVERY PART OF IT
- Aug 15·2 repliesNobodyWins
Also GotG writing was no better than Spiderman 1 or 2 lol and the gameplay was way worse.
LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
- Aug 15
fans of the formula get hyper defensive of the formula . Which is fine in a way but thats part of why companies dont grow or advance gameplay . thats part of why you get the gameplay and story issues you do with spider man 2 . Because they serving a choir. Fans that cant both like something while also giving feedback so that it improves. thats how you get the entire home trilogy where each time a movie dropped fans instantly said "woo this the best spider man yet" . Sometimes have to give constructive criticism especially when again they are the only ones dropping hero games. the s*** going to sell regardless you are the only d*** dealer. Its okay to advance some from what people know, play around with level design and choices of the gameplay
- Aug 15·2 repliesNobodyWins
Didn’t realize you played the whole game by bad bro! Also everyone who has actually played it is praising the story and said it’s good. I trust people who’ve actually played it over watching clips to be fair.
- Aug 15Cherrywine001
LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
One of the highest rated hero games in recent memory
Insomniac creatively design wise did a lot in ratchet and clank then came back to the hero pipeline and it for some feels like complacency
- Aug 15·1 replyCherrywine001
LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Speaking facts
- Aug 15·1 replyCherrywine001
There’s that whining talk that most KTT users love to do
Sees 20 mins max of a 15-20 hour game and knows exactly how it’ll be
- Aug 15·1 replyNobodyWins
Speaking facts
SM1 was good (not amazing) but SM2 was absolute dogshit and if you think otherwise it’s hard to take what you’re saying seriously. GotG writing is some of the best in capeshit gaming
