So state corruption and expropiación and f***ing up every company and running it to the ground is US fault. It’s so wild the mental gymnastics y’all do to make dictatorships look like the good guys
there is no mental gymnastics it’s taking the time to understand its more nuanced than “corruption” or good guys vs bad guys or whatever racist caricature of a d*** lord you think Maduro is to blindly run cover for American imperialism
Maduro isn’t even the main factor whatever stooge they put in his place will continue to “corruption” except this time idk Shell and Exxon will get a larger share of profits than Venezuela capital
making him check in with mamdani damn
Mamdani is basically the Trick Trick of global politics
How long will it take the us comprador to start doing their rounds at the IMF and World Bank to talk about privatization and financial independence
What’s your favorite breakfast
4 scrambled eggs
2 avocados
1 orange
2 pieces of whole wheat bread topped with cottage cheese
Greek yogurt with blueberries, strawberries, lightly glazed with pure honey and topped off with a spoon full of peanut butter
1 scoop protein shake
yes tf it does
somebody who's spent their whole life in Venezuela has more correct a***ysis than somebody who has never been there and has only read articles about it
that's not what he said
in that case a pro-maduro venezuelan's viewpoint/analysis is just as correct as his, so what's the conclusion one can make from two people just giving their subjective opinions?
and making the other alternative "a person who only reads articles" is kind of dishonest lol. what about pol sc scholars? there are people who've dedicated their lives to studying certain conflicts and areas without ever having lived there really
That’s stupid as f***.
That’s like saying the Roaring 20’s were an amazing time because of what people like the rich financiers of New York were saying about their experience at the time
firsthand experience from the common people (not financiers) provides facts, context, and constraints that outsiders lack or don't understand. treating lived experience as irrelevant is as flawed as treating it as decisive, but I'd still put more weight in firsthand experience than someone who has no real connection to the topic
firsthand experience from the common people (not financiers) provides facts, context, and constraints that outsiders lack or don't understand. treating lived experience as irrelevant is as flawed as treating it as decisive, but I'd still put more weight in firsthand experience than someone who has no real connection to the topic
Someone’s material a***ysis being informative and contextual does not mean it’s coherent or materially correct
Emotional connections mean nothing in the grand scheme of knowledge even if they’re motivators to learn and know more. It’s about how robust your worldview is when you put it up against the way things really end up working
This that 20th century imperialism
that's not what he said
in that case a pro-maduro venezuelan's viewpoint/analysis is just as correct as his, so what's the conclusion one can make from two people just giving their subjective opinions?
and making the other alternative "a person who only reads articles" is kind of dishonest lol. what about pol sc scholars? there are people who've dedicated their lives to studying certain conflicts and areas without ever having lived there really
it should all be taken with a grain of salt, with multiple perspectives of people who are actually living through it
I'm assuming nobody itt is a pol sci with a background in Venezuelan politics. if there were two scholars like that, I'd value the work of the person born and raised in Venezuela over the scholar who's never been to South America
South Africa vs Israel in a neck in neck race to the bottom