Egregious means really bad
i have a tattoo but idk how you would know about it unless you've been creeping on me irl
Theory-jerking like this is why so many leftist organizations have trouble getting s*** done. Because of instead if getting out there and doing something you hav a bunch of white men sitting in a dank room in the library talking about dialectal materialism for 3 hours
i have a tattoo but idk how you would know about it unless you've been creeping on me irl
Not that deep u Made a post bout it Smh
She is a dumb b****. Her twitter is now private, she’ll deactivate if we get lucky
Edit: she’s back and is attacking Beyoncé again
I have no idea what that means in OP
It means she doesn't believe in a proletarian revolution and she's open-minded. It's pablum, that's why it's obfuscatory.
Theory-jerking like this is why so many leftist organizations have trouble getting s*** done. Because of instead if getting out there and doing something you hav a bunch of white men sitting in a dank room in the library talking about dialectal materialism for 3 hours
You have your opinion
Theory-jerking like this is why so many leftist organizations have trouble getting s*** done. Because of instead if getting out there and doing something you hav a bunch of white men sitting in a dank room in the library talking about dialectal materialism for 3 hours
Theory-jerking like this is why so many leftist organizations have trouble getting s*** done. Because of instead if getting out there and doing something you hav a bunch of white men sitting in a dank room in the library talking about dialectal materialism for 3 hours
...and the 100 years plus of anti communuist propaganda and the assassination of all major black revolutionaries in the USA by the FBI
hegel would probably smack people for their interpretation of his thoughts today
NoName is right in theory most of the time. She isn’t an educator and therefore doesn’t know how to relay that information in a way where most people regardless of affiliation will digest. That’s why she isn’t Angela Davis.
She already said it’s not her job to teach you about any of this. Listen to those that made the decision to teach over scream
People get upset at NoName cause she's the female version of @Synopsis
Synopsis has better takes and is honestly less self righteous
hegel would probably smack people for their interpretation of his thoughts today
Sounds like a common critique of the "teleological" quality of "Marxism."
The "Particular direction or vector" term is a clue...
People say (orthodox?) "Marxism" argues that there is set development path, ie. Primitive to Feudalism to Capitalism to Communism (needs revolution).
NoName is right in theory most of the time. She isn’t an educator and therefore doesn’t know how to relay that information in a way where most people regardless of affiliation will digest. That’s why she isn’t Angela Davis.
She already said it’s not her job to teach you about any of this. Listen to those that made the decision to teach over scream
People get upset at NoName because she's a Hegelian not a Marxist in that she doesn't foreclose on the possibility of new contradictions in the body politic, i.e. unlike her critics she doesn't presuppose a particular direction or vector of change- AND IS HONEST ABOUT THIS
Hopefully we can have a HEALTHY discourse ittt
Her a***ysis is way too racialized for her to be Hegelian or a Marxist