Thread was locked by
a moderator
  • Jan 18, 2020
    NiceLikeChrist

    Lack luster animations? Cutscene animations are terrible, many of the battle animations are also subpar. Have you seen zacian and zamazenta turning? Pure jokes.

    What pokemon game has had voice acting? None. And it's about time they get called out on it because what respectful RPG doesn't have a single shred of voice acting?

    Fans have been consuming mediocre game after mediocre game for years. Coming to the switch was supposed to be a BIG deal not "lets give the fans a humble game". That's bullshit. Do you even understand how long people have waited for a 3D mainline pokemon game? I don't think you grasp this.

    And what do we get after waiting 20+ years? Hallway routes and half the pokemon cut.

    So yea, now we're calling out these games on their bullshit. It's time for Nintendo to run Pokemon. Gamefreak just doesn't have what it takes.

    the zacian turning s*** is like the only time I noticed terrible animation. It didn't kill the experience for me at all nor did any of this lack luster animation you claim.

    Like i said if this all bothered you enough to ruin your experience try to get a refund or sell your game i guess

  • Jan 18, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    NiceLikeChrist

    Lack luster animations? Cutscene animations are terrible, many of the battle animations are also subpar. Have you seen zacian and zamazenta turning? Pure jokes.

    What pokemon game has had voice acting? None. And it's about time they get called out on it because what respectful RPG doesn't have a single shred of voice acting?

    Fans have been consuming mediocre game after mediocre game for years. Coming to the switch was supposed to be a BIG deal not "lets give the fans a humble game". That's bullshit. Do you even understand how long people have waited for a 3D mainline pokemon game? I don't think you grasp this.

    And what do we get after waiting 20+ years? Hallway routes and half the pokemon cut.

    So yea, now we're calling out these games on their bullshit. It's time for Nintendo to run Pokemon. Gamefreak just doesn't have what it takes.

    and no pokemon were cut. They didn't have a national dex to start out the game.

    tell me were the gen 1 pokemon in ruby and sapphire or did you have to purchase the other games to get them in the game?

    do you see how ridculous it sounds from what you're arguing.

    It's not cut content its s*** theyre adding as the console generation ages and progresses

  • Jan 18, 2020

    I intially Gave Gen 8 an 8/10 because I enjoyed it so much but recently I built Killzone:Shadowfall and added a “enjoyablitlty” category to my ratings which SwSh was probably an 8 in those categories but a 6 or below in orhers.

    So I’ll probably drop it down 1 to 2 scores

  • Jan 18, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Triplesss

    and no pokemon were cut. They didn't have a national dex to start out the game.

    tell me were the gen 1 pokemon in ruby and sapphire or did you have to purchase the other games to get them in the game?

    do you see how ridculous it sounds from what you're arguing.

    It's not cut content its s*** theyre adding as the console generation ages and progresses

    “No Pokémon were cut”

    Yikes

    They were cut man

    If you can’t see that you are bending over backwards

  • Jan 18, 2020

    Wether or not they were intended to be in the game, the National dex was still cut from previous gems meaning they WERE cut and that’s a fact.

  • Jan 18, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Luca

    “No Pokémon were cut”

    Yikes

    They were cut man

    If you can’t see that you are bending over backwards

    bro when did they ever say they would add it into the new gen?

    Sorry just because theres a change doesn't mean its cut content.

    One of the main reasons for not adding all the old pokemon was because they wanted a more fresh and new competitive climate.

    If it wasn't originally intended to be in the game doesn't mean it was cut lmao.

  • Jan 18, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Triplesss

    bro when did they ever say they would add it into the new gen?

    Sorry just because theres a change doesn't mean its cut content.

    One of the main reasons for not adding all the old pokemon was because they wanted a more fresh and new competitive climate.

    If it wasn't originally intended to be in the game doesn't mean it was cut lmao.

    So they were cut from Gen 7 to Gen 8. How is that not cutting Pokémon?

  • Jan 18, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Luca

    So they were cut from Gen 7 to Gen 8. How is that not cutting Pokémon?

    what do you mean lmao

  • Jan 18, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    Was Snake not cut from Smash 4?

  • Jan 18, 2020
    ·
    2 replies
    Triplesss

    what do you mean lmao

    If pokemon were in Gen 7 but weren’t in Gen 8 they were cut between gems. Therefore they were cut from Pokémon.

  • Jan 18, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Luca

    Was Snake not cut from Smash 4?

    the character wasn't intended to be in the game. If you consider that cutting it still doesn't change the nature of the convo.

  • Jan 18, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Luca

    If pokemon were in Gen 7 but weren’t in Gen 8 they were cut between gems. Therefore they were cut from Pokémon.

    they arent the same games lmao do you not get this? just because something was in previous games doesn't mean it was intended to be in the next iteration.

  • Jan 18, 2020
    Triplesss

    the character wasn't intended to be in the game. If you consider that cutting it still doesn't change the nature of the convo.

    It was still cut from the Smash Bros Series.

    Everyone in the Smash community considers them cut characters.

  • Jan 18, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Luca

    If pokemon were in Gen 7 but weren’t in Gen 8 they were cut between gems. Therefore they were cut from Pokémon.

    they clearly had a plan to slowly add pokemon through this generation over allowing you to just have all from the start. That's how they intended the game to play out.

  • Jan 18, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Triplesss

    they arent the same games lmao do you not get this? just because something was in previous games doesn't mean it was intended to be in the next iteration.

    Okay and?

    That still means the Pokémon were cut out of the franchise.

  • Jan 18, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Triplesss

    they clearly had a plan to slowly add pokemon through this generation over allowing you to just have all from the start. That's how they intended the game to play out.

    I don’t believe this. I believe they cut content because they ran out of time or cut content to make more $$$ because people bend over backwards for anything Pokémon does.

  • Jan 18, 2020
    Luca

    Okay and?

    That still means the Pokémon were cut out of the franchise.

    okay lets say this was cut.

    If it was never originally meant to be in the game, and they disclosed this publicly from before the game came out, whats the issue?

    You had the information just don't buy the game at that point

  • Jan 18, 2020

    Okay, imma drop this now.

    FP2 better be good for Smash man

  • Jan 18, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Luca

    I don’t believe this. I believe they cut content because they ran out of time or cut content to make more $$$ because people bend over backwards for anything Pokémon does.

    but to get pokemon from previous games you have to buy those games lmaooo like what

  • Jan 18, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Triplesss

    but to get pokemon from previous games you have to buy those games lmaooo like what

    Games that I already had access too since I already owned previous content

    This is the first time you’ve needed future content to get the Pokémon.

  • Jan 18, 2020

    It’s clear we aren’t going to change each other’s minds. Have a good day.

  • Jan 18, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Luca

    Games that I already had access too since I already owned previous content

    This is the first time you’ve needed future content to get the Pokémon.

    games that not everyone has access to lmao. Not everyone has a 3ds or ds or those games.

    You can still trade the pokemon from the new games and participate in raids if you dont have the dlc. How is this charging a wallet

  • Jan 18, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Triplesss

    games that not everyone has access to lmao. Not everyone has a 3ds or ds or those games.

    You can still trade the pokemon from the new games and participate in raids if you dont have the dlc. How is this charging a wallet

    You have to have NSO and home to trade unless you have 500 hours to trade 200 Pokémon locally LOL

  • Jan 18, 2020

    NSO shouldn’t be required for trading IMO, only battling others

  • Jan 18, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Luca

    You have to have NSO and home to trade unless you have 500 hours to trade 200 Pokémon locally LOL

    you also have to have 30 dollars for each of the games to get all the pokemon yourself lmao. If you dont have switch online and have to trade locally with someone who has everything how is that any slower

Thread was locked by
a moderator