I could not lock in with that goofy zoom crowd screen and fake crowd noise over the PA

it was real hoops, but ya way less atmosphere

I don’t remember too much of it tbh. I’m really just tight the lakers won it not gonna hold you lol

they don’t even discuss sports in there lol, it’s mostly old ass dudes making d*** jokes

Mickey Mouse ring counts

This one of the dumbest arguments ever just off the fact, it’s still a ring at the end of the day lol.

Clippers being frauds has been innate since “Lob City” whether they wanted to be in the bubble or not, they were gonna lose anyways lol

The Spyda vs. Jamal games alone made it worth it.

Yall niggas casuals i see why yall aint post in sport sxn @Ye24 drop a gem on these niggas

And Corey Brewer dropped 51 in 2014, your point? Lol

Casual? I been watching the nba since 2005 lil bro 😂 saying Donovan Mitchell ball made the nba bubble worth it is an atrocious statement

Of course it counts

But it's one of those rings that makes you want to get another one immediately after, more so than other rings, so there's no debate surrounding it

Championship is a championship but the offense inside the bubble was at a historic level. 3 point percents, ft rate and ft percents all skyrocketed in the bubble compared to the reg season.

You had multiple players like dame come out and say it was much easier to shoot in the bubble and AD was proof of that.

Ad shot midrange jumpers like he was jordan which he didn't do before or after the bubble

Surprised this isn’t another @queer thread

Old as f*** and p****

i did find it a little odd AD stopped being a “midrange assassin” (that’s what the media called him) after the bubble but hey

Because that was an outlier

you're wrong, this is info that you can google lmao

AD 19-20 playoffs:

.175% of his shots were from 10-16 feet
.187% of his shots were from 16-3pt shot

he shot 40% from 10-16 feet and 55% from 16-3pt shot

AD last playoffs:

.197% of his shots were from 10-16 feet
.93% of his shots were from 16-3pt shot

he shot 41% from 10-16 feet and 59% from 16-3pt shot

That nba players are talented. No matter if you a benchwarmer.

Is what I think he meant.

I don't give a s*** about his rate in relation to his other shots.

2019-20 pre bubble: 4.1 midranges a game on 33-34%
Bubble: 5.5 on 49.7 percent

Last year pre playoffs: 3.8 on 36%
Last year post season: 2.8 on 47-48 percent

So once again, he never did that bubble s*** again. He was shooting the midrange in the bubble at the same exact clip as f***ing kevin durant his first 2 years in gsw.

nba.com/stats/players/shooting?Season=2019-20&SeasonType=Playoffs&DistanceRange=By+Zone&sort=Mid-Range+FGA&dir=1&TeamID=1610612747

we're talking about the bubble playoffs and you're bringing up regular season. you proved my point, he shot essentially the same percentages.

why can no one on the site admit when they're wrong

Are you good? I am showing you the entire picture. I didn't call him jordan because he just shot 49 percent but because he shot 49 percent AND shot 6 of them a f***ing game.

Like what the f*** we doing

the basis of the discussion are the playoffs so i dont see why you're bringing up regular season.

regardless of varying volume, he shot essentially the same percentages in the playoffs and they were similar in new orleans as well. so he has done is shown he can be just as efficient whether its on lower or higher volume, doesnt sound fluky to me as you tried to make it out to be.

I brought up the reg season to show you how drastically of an outlier the playoffs was for him. Took more a game and went up a whole 16 percentage points lmfaooo

And the volume is equally as important to the percent. He's never came close to replicate that efficiency on those attempts which is why the bubble is an outlier.

Admit you were wrong like you tried to say nobody on ktt does

do u not see the jump from before the bubble to the bubble

i don’t even like $tats but even i can see it

he wasn’t even shooting nowhere near as good @ face value just watching the games casually