Nuja 🦋Jun 25, 2020
DelejaynNoName has the information. She is just shooting it with a bazooka. Her biggest flaw is her delivery.
Agreed
- Jun 25, 2020stingray
How’s an indie artist in a world that’s exploited by capitalists from all sides a part of the problem?
Jay-Z’s accumulation of wealth is nothing short than Buffet’s or Bezos’s. In order for you to have that much money, you’re endorsing every element of injustice inherent in capitalism. A black billionaire isn’t better than a white one by the virtue of their race
I said she is apart of the system. I never said the problem.
Jun 25, 2020·edited·2 repliesstingrayHow’s an indie artist in a world that’s exploited by capitalists from all sides a part of the problem?
Jay-Z’s accumulation of wealth is nothing short than Buffet’s or Bezos’s. In order for you to have that much money, you’re endorsing every element of injustice inherent in capitalism. A black billionaire isn’t better than a white one by the virtue of their race
Explain how Bloomberg accumulated his wealth in a way that exploited millions of people and how it endorsed every evil in Capitalism
Go, I wanna hear this
Jun 25, 2020·1 replyKuntaKinteExplain how Bloomberg accumulated his wealth in a way that exploited millions of people and how it endorsed every evil in Capitalism
Go, I wanna hear this
just because people weren’t exploited directly doesn’t mean there was no exploitation at all. The stock market in itself is exploitative in that its people basically buying and selling the labor of certain businesses in the market like a game. If it truly wasn’t exploitative, there would be no stock market as nobody would be able to buy out someone’s labor and money without their direct consent.
Bloomberg’s complicit actions in further reinforcing the infrastructure of the stock market, making use of third world labor, and trading himself makes him exploitative
- Jun 25, 2020·1 replyAmericana 2
just because people weren’t exploited directly doesn’t mean there was no exploitation at all. The stock market in itself is exploitative in that its people basically buying and selling the labor of certain businesses in the market like a game. If it truly wasn’t exploitative, there would be no stock market as nobody would be able to buy out someone’s labor and money without their direct consent.
Bloomberg’s complicit actions in further reinforcing the infrastructure of the stock market, making use of third world labor, and trading himself makes him exploitative
This is a reach
When construction workers build and create the infrastructure that allows companies and headquarters for agencies like Chase to succeed they are complicit.
When healthcare workers knowingly save the lives of stock brokers, they are complicit.
News Journalist who document stock trends are complicit
You are complicit for posting in a category for Music on a Hip Hop former that promotes consumption of music in a capitalistic setting
People reach like this because they know arguing that Bloomberg Terminal inherently or directly exploited anyone is a reach
The same way you argue about Bloomberg Terminal, I could argue about Hospital Electronic Medical Records in the context of Insurance companies
- Jun 25, 2020·1 replyKuntaKinte
This is a reach
When construction workers build and create the infrastructure that allows companies and headquarters for agencies like Chase to succeed they are complicit.
When healthcare workers knowingly save the lives of stock brokers, they are complicit.
News Journalist who document stock trends are complicit
You are complicit for posting in a category for Music on a Hip Hop former that promotes consumption of music in a capitalistic setting
People reach like this because they know arguing that Bloomberg Terminal inherently or directly exploited anyone is a reach
The same way you argue about Bloomberg Terminal, I could argue about Hospital Electronic Medical Records in the context of Insurance companies
now you’re getting it, the only people who aren’t complicit at the end of the day are the third world people and the immigrants of america who produce all of our products and luxuries for cents on the dollar
i already shared my opinion off the profit motive of art and the way it taints all artistic integrity
but once again, he is also a trader himself so he’s far more directly involved than any of us
- Jun 25, 2020Americana 2
now you’re getting it, the only people who aren’t complicit at the end of the day are the third world people and the immigrants of america who produce all of our products and luxuries for cents on the dollar
i already shared my opinion off the profit motive of art and the way it taints all artistic integrity
but once again, he is also a trader himself so he’s far more directly involved than any of us
Lowkey I agree so Im just gonna say respect. Tbh
- Jun 25, 2020·2 repliesKuntaKinte
Explain how Bloomberg accumulated his wealth in a way that exploited millions of people and how it endorsed every evil in Capitalism
Go, I wanna hear this
You answered your own question. Wealth accumulation is inherently exploitative because it appropriated the labour of the many and assign it to the owner of the workforce. All the hours that Bloomberg worked in his life doesn’t add up to his wealth when you a***yze costs. It takes an army of employees to generate that kind of revenue; now, are they fairly compensated? No, because in the end the output of their labour is more expensive than its cost (their wages).
Hoarding money is also exploitative. If you take the money of the one percent and distribute it evenly across the globe, you will eradicate poverty for centuries. That’s another face of how capitalism exploits
- Jun 25, 2020·1 replystingray
You answered your own question. Wealth accumulation is inherently exploitative because it appropriated the labour of the many and assign it to the owner of the workforce. All the hours that Bloomberg worked in his life doesn’t add up to his wealth when you a***yze costs. It takes an army of employees to generate that kind of revenue; now, are they fairly compensated? No, because in the end the output of their labour is more expensive than its cost (their wages).
Hoarding money is also exploitative. If you take the money of the one percent and distribute it evenly across the globe, you will eradicate poverty for centuries. That’s another face of how capitalism exploits
Lmfao cmon man
- Jun 25, 2020·editedstingray
You answered your own question. Wealth accumulation is inherently exploitative because it appropriated the labour of the many and assign it to the owner of the workforce. All the hours that Bloomberg worked in his life doesn’t add up to his wealth when you a***yze costs. It takes an army of employees to generate that kind of revenue; now, are they fairly compensated? No, because in the end the output of their labour is more expensive than its cost (their wages).
Hoarding money is also exploitative. If you take the money of the one percent and distribute it evenly across the globe, you will eradicate poverty for centuries. That’s another face of how capitalism exploits
This is the wrong answer. Bloomberg straight up charges 25k per subscriber.
There was no way humanly possible he wouldnt be a billionaire.
You cant argue about Bloomberg being a billionaire solely off how he accumulated his wealth since he's literally charging a f***load of bands to like 300k sub scribers.
You have to argue about how the institutions he props up with his company are exploitative
Jun 25, 2020
Your Average JetY’all done shamed Noname into smoking loud
https://www.instagram.com/p/CB3Lq4dhl9M/?igshid=vmijw1j169bwSounds like she f***ed with some psychedelic s***
- Nuja 🦋Jun 25, 2020·1 reply
All this situation has proved is how Twitter progressives are fake and hypocritical as hell
Jun 25, 2020·1 replyNujaAll this situation has proved is how Twitter progressives are fake and hypocritical as hell
"Twitter progressives" more like "Look at me I'm mAkING CHaNGe"
- Jun 25, 2020·1 replyUhoh
Lmfao cmon man
la.utexas.edu/users/hcleaver/357k/Chapter%2025.html
Educate yourself
Mmm Hmm 😆Jun 25, 2020·1 replyAP3CLAP FOR EM
!https://youtu.be/hhEQlImsc2c
Didnt hov diss cole on star is born
- Jun 25, 2020·1 replystingray
http://la.utexas.edu/users/hcleaver/357k/Chapter%2025.html
Educate yourself
I have read marx n s*** enough to know its nonsense
- Jun 25, 2020·1 replyMmm Hmm
Didnt hov diss cole on star is born
- Mmm Hmm 😆Jun 25, 2020·1 replyAP3
Hov didn't mention J Cole in the song not once so I take that as a subliminal diss.
no cap
- Jun 25, 2020Mmm Hmm
Hov didn't mention J Cole in the song not once so I take that as a subliminal diss.
no cap
Nah, if he got a verse than that’s worth more than a shoutout.
OPJun 25, 2020·1 replyYour Average JetY’all done shamed Noname into smoking loud
https://www.instagram.com/p/CB3Lq4dhl9M/?igshid=vmijw1j169bwthis aint even loud loud
this a whisperbetter than that mid tho
- Jun 25, 2020Aiko
this aint even loud loud
this a whisperbetter than that mid tho
I can forgive Noname for a lot of things but that tweet about making mid relevant is unforgivable.
- Jun 25, 2020Uhoh
I have read marx n s*** enough to know its nonsense
Lmfao okay big guy
- Nuja 🦋Jun 25, 2020Altar
"Twitter progressives" more like "Look at me I'm mAkING CHaNGe"
For what it’s worth some of them really are. But it’s never the loud ones who are angry at EVERYTHING
- Jun 26, 2020
classic thread
Jun 26, 2020
ReplicaThis girl is just a mess
Never understood her hype. Only thing I ever liked by her was her feature on Lost and some Freedom Interlude or something