Shoo shoo Metis shill
Shillers say like 5 words and dissappear, im literally going in detail & context, and providing examples.
Metis aside, seems the market is revving up. Near protocol & phonon dao are 2 others im liking. Big airdrop coming to near protocol for sweatcoin users btw
Shillers say like 5 words and dissappear, im literally going in detail & context, and providing examples.
Metis aside, seems the market is revving up. Near protocol & phonon dao are 2 others im liking. Big airdrop coming to near protocol for sweatcoin users btw
Metis sucks and there are much better L2s deal with it
Metis sucks and there are much better L2s deal with it
Surface level statement, name the l2, then reference actual facts about the l2 which make it better such as the swap & bridging fees. You can't, so I expect another surface level response.
What constituents "better: if every l2 your about to attempt to name, metis has it beat. Literally type in l2 fees website, who's at the top, metis.
Surface level statement, name the l2, then reference actual facts about the l2 which make it better such as the swap & bridging fees. You can't, so I expect another surface level response.
What constituents "better: if every l2 your about to attempt to name, metis has it beat. Literally type in l2 fees website, who's at the top, metis.
Arbitrum is fundamentally designed better than optimism MEV vamps
You are shilling a fork which means they will never innovate beyond the Optimism team
Not to mention MATIC or any side chain
And then there's things like BSC or AVAX and SOL which are clearly superior
Arbitrum is fundamentally designed better than optimism MEV vamps
You are shilling a fork which means they will never innovate beyond the Optimism team
Not to mention MATIC or any side chain
And then there's things like BSC or AVAX and SOL which are clearly superior
Innovation. Good choice of word. What Is optimism currently trying to implement on their blockchain? You can name more than 1 thing.
After you name it, go check if metis already has it because that's basically the situation between op and metis. How's that nft bridge coming along at optimism 😂😂😂 metis bridge working fine...for months. But you keep referencing the mid pack version 😐
Arbitrum is fundamentally designed better than optimism MEV vamps
You are shilling a fork which means they will never innovate beyond the Optimism team
Not to mention MATIC or any side chain
And then there's things like BSC or AVAX and SOL which are clearly superior
The topic is scaling solutions but your naming already pumped up blockchains sitting in billions in marketcap with higher gas fees. Sol, avax, and bsc are superior in marketcap price only. Metis had those blockchains beat in every category used for/when comparing blockchains.
Being early ain't for everyone. I remember when avax when 3billion and dudes would enter tg saying "damn I'm early" lmao. It's a matter of perspective. Someone who has avax when it was in the 50m marketcap range perception of what's early is different from the guy entering the blockchain at 3bil Mc.
Bsc, avax, sol, all several billions in marketcap already. To 4x on avax alone right now, avax needs another 16billion roughly before that's a 4x if you were to buy in right now this second. In comparison, to 4x on metis atm, 300-398m is the number needed. 16billion vs 398million. Metis has wayyy more room for growth
AN NFT BRIDGE
Even more hilarious when you see optimism doesn't have 1 💀. You say jokes, but everyone reading this can surmise that optimism looks bad having to double back and add things metis already has implemented, despite metis forking optimism to begin with. 2 teams with similar templates only 1 performs better than the other. And your a supporter of the old outdated version which will be dumped by the vcs as they wait on them to add features already on metis. Jokes
Good job killing the thread idiot
No I just put you in a box. As I said, name the l2's and you can't. Your Points were debunked
I don't need to name L2s. I already did, you completely ignored the fact that Arbitrum is a better structural design for example
This shows you do not understand the WHY
Not to mention something like MATIC
Then regarding your market cap comparison, it again ignores a major metric which is RISK to upside as well as downside
And regarding L2s and L1 -> They are all competing for activity
All will settle back on ETH
There is no guarantee that the architecture for layer 2s will win out to modular interactive blockchains
The end user will not care
You clearly don't understand what you're talking about even if you're able to keep up with the latest "product releases" marketing hype
Saying that the Metis development is better than Optimism is actually pathetic though
I hate Optimism btw
But Metis literally wouldn't exist without the source lol
Go look at something like SUSHI
Even with them "out-innovating" UniSwap they literally couldn't actually innovate the X*Y=K. Just a bunch of features no one cares about
Noone gives a f*** about an "NFT bridge" in your example - to dumb it down for you
You handwave the most important points away and then go on random irrelevant tangents
Why would any serious NFT project even use METIS in the first place
They will use
ETH
FLOW
SOL
AVAX
MATIC
etc
See this is my point, you are stupid at best or disingenuous at worst
I bought some Metis nfts and they never sold
That's because there's no one to buy them (besides formerly you)
That's because there's no one to buy them (besides formerly you)
Exactly, it’s a ghost chain now, literally nothing is happening on it rn