Almost like right wing rhetoric is inherently violent in nature
Insane how this is what happens when a white mans kill another white man
But everything is fine ans progresive people are at fault
Yours is an unidentified “source”
About a reliable as a source from the National
Enquirer
That’s what the Wall Street journal reported.
Additionally, the shell casings ARE engraved. I’m missing your point here
Who tf is Kapo
@Hndrxx_Free
Colombian dude popping rn
He makes island vibey music
From “your making s*** up” to “wAs iT tWiTtEr oR wAlL sTrEeT 🤓”
If you don’t understand the difference between a report from a Twitter account and a national newspaper, that’s the entire problem
That’s what the Wall Street journal reported.
Additionally, the shell casings ARE engraved. I’m missing your point here
And it being reported from Wall Street journal automatically made it more legitimate then Twitter even though it was an unconfirmed report coming from an unidentified source?
I’m missing your point about that here.
Insane how this is what happens when a white mans kill another white man
https://twitter.com/micah_erfan/status/1966495337528308214But everything is fine ans progresive people are at fault
Notice this will not be addressed
And it being reported from Wall Street journal automatically made it more legitimate then Twitter even though it was an unconfirmed report coming from an unidentified source?
I’m missing your point about that here.
Yes. It automatically makes it more legitimate than Twitter. If I have to explain this to you, that’s insanity
animalique
Is it good?? I gotta try more byredo
Notice this will not be addressed
White nationalists are bad? Idk what needs to be addressed. Those are Nazis
Yes. It automatically makes it more legitimate than Twitter. If I have to explain this to you, that’s insanity
You’re being stubborn and obtuse rn. Yours was not confirmed by an official source and yet you wrote it as if that was the case. That’s what I’m getting at here. Arguing about which platform you read it from doesn’t change the actual bottom line on the reporting
@YungPapi gonna go out on a limb and say that he’s probably not a maga supporter
Bullets recovered after Charlie Kirk’s assassination were engraved with “transgender and antifascist ideology,” a law enforcement source told The Wall Street Journal.
The “transgender” ideology was later retracted. The bullets have “TRN” on them which is the manufacturer but media and government said “it’s trans extremism!”
Some outlets have retracted others are probably leaving it to farm clout.
White nationalists are bad? Idk what needs to be addressed. Those are Nazis
That’s a large sect of the right voter base pal
Even if you aren’t one that’s what you’re supporting and that’s who you support is courting and stoking
And the bullets WERE engraved so it wasn’t even wrong? What is the point here?
Yes they were engraved
But what was wrong was the information that you were running with, with what was engraved. What actually was engraved was completely different.
Is it good?? I gotta try more byredo
brother..... i love animalique.
one of the reviews on parfumo
A fleecy musk, clean and plushy. A domesticated animalic, bottle-fed from birth and snug in a handknit jumper. On second thought, I wouldn’t even call it animalic in the slightest. It’s a distant, fond memory of animals. If this scent were an item, it’d be a suede and shearling jacket. Or a very expensive teddy bear. The suede is already soft, but further gentled by classic Byredo violet, cool and powdery. The whole fragrance is very Byredo. (You can take that as either a complement or warning). Longevity is well above average, though. Lasted me a whole ten-hour coach flight and had me dreaming I was cozied up in first.
You’re being stubborn and obtuse rn. Yours was not confirmed by an official source and yet you wrote it as if that was the case. That’s what I’m getting at here. Arguing about which platform you read it from doesn’t change the actual bottom line on the reporting
When a press journalist has a source, they have a set of standards to go by before they use it. A source can be unidentified for safety or for a thousand other reasons. The point is that it’s being reported by a press journalist. A Twitter account has no standard to meet. They can say anything they want. How do you not get this
The “transgender” ideology was later retracted. The bullets have “TRN” on them which is the manufacturer but media and government said “it’s trans extremism!”
Some outlets have retracted others are probably leaving it to farm clout.
I’m gonna leave it at this and let ET do his mental gymnastics solo Dolo.
Yes they were engraved
But what was wrong was the information that you were running with, with what was engraved. What actually was engraved was completely different.
The source said they were engraved with transgender and antifascist ideology. One of the bullets was engraved with “catch this fascist”. Does that qualify for you for antifascist ideology?
The other bullet was engraved with “hey that’s a bulge owo” which is a meme originating with furries. Ok so they may have thought furries were transgender ideology, idk. But you’re acting like it’s completely wrong and off
Why would it be “more powerful”
Because that's what the right wants for the perfect narrative?
Because that's what the right wants for the perfect narrative?
Is that supposed to be a good thing
It absolutely does matter who did it tf
We got lunatics who are threatening violence on innocent people over this s***. If it’s the right, they deserve to take a long hard look in the mirror like the left had to when they lost the election because of an incompetent party.
You are reading into too much of what I said.
Someone took someone's life. Undeserved.
That's all.