everyone said its a reasonable belief to think he wasnt involved with the gov even if we think he is. its just wild to think he wasnt blackmailing ppl

I had to go to the grocery today and yes I skipped target

I understand, that’s not the point. The point is evidence of blackmail and the fact that the “evidence” eventually devolved to just recordings existing.

The only poster itt with children is arguing in defense of Jeffrey Epstein

We need the thread locked forever

I’m not defending Epstein at all. I think he’s a sick f*** and that the entire sick ring of powerful pedophiles that he rolled with should all be castrated in public. I just genuinely think the broader conspiracies are psyops created to lead people away from the actual culprits ever catching justice.

what evidence is there thinking epstein blackmailed people is a psyop so the people in his ring dont get caught?

@Extraterrestrial Bonus question
If me and u r chillin at the crib and Uc my d*** print do u:
A. Touch it
B. Ignore it
C. Image it in yo but play it cool D.
F*** on it

B then give up into C then give up and into A then give up and into D

Idk

ET wants to know the name so he can buy it

I don’t feel like going back and reading the whole argument

But isn’t it pretty well established that he had like a billion secret cameras in his crib for recording people in compromising situations

I was just curious. Apparently it was a clown costume.
How tf is that a clown

He was just like doing that

Probably

• et

according to et this isnt blackmail and no reasonable person would think it is

Idk John Target was trippin tho

I have this too

I’ll level with you. There’s a lot of evidence that Epstein collected compromising s***, had surveillance set up, and used intimidation or coercion when allegations threatened him or people around him. What hasn’t actually been proven is that he was systematically using that information to blackmail powerful people.

There is no evidence he ever used those videos to blackmail someone. Could he have? Sure. Is there evidence? No. It doesn’t get simpler

What else would it be for

You only hide the cameras if u want people to behave as if they’re not being filmed

and ontop of this, just having them, knowing that if you get caught they will be release or discussed, or using them as coercion to influence the behaviour of the other part at all, is the definition of blackmail.

Do you think Luigi is the actual assassin

That’s too rational stop it

I think we can all agree that when Trump got grazed it was an inside job

For mutually assured destruction.
I’m not having this argument for the third time so you can read back for more context but:

If a group of people all decide to commit a crime, and they all agree that if anyone talks, they all go down together. That’s not blackmail. For it to be blackmail, in a conversational sense, one party has to asymmetrically benefit.