I asked if R Kelly forced penetration or whether it was just a case of age and now I'm a rape apologist lol. This site funny.
“Just”
I asked if R Kelly forced penetration or whether it was just a case of age and now I'm a rape apologist lol. This site funny.
Honestly should have googled it lol. Would have been easier
Cause I'm allowed to ask a f***ing question about a case wtf?
It’s just a weird distinction that really does not need to be made
lock the thread man, some of you guys are psychopaths
Probably the worst thread I’ve seen in a long time but I can’t look away either
Bro, how do you look at threads like these and still believe toxic masculinity is a myth It's all over this site
They’re just toxic, idk what masculinity has to do with it
In real life, when you and another party are having a conversation and you don't agree with them, do you get as emotional as you are now?
if the topic is about r kelly and the topic of rape and he's arguing for, abso f***ing lutely.
Look. R Kelly is a talented guy but also obviously a piece of s*** and is mentally off. There’s no conspiracy here. People arguing about dumb s*** itt. The fact is when you’re up, it’s harder for people to be prosecuted, victims to come forward, and they also have more resources to fight off things. There’s more of a power dynamic and intimidation factor, and a machine behind him. Now that he’s down, both financially and culturally, and doesn’t have that machine with him, of course it’s open season. That doesn’t make him less of a piece of s*** and it doesn’t make him a martyr. If you want to argue something, you could argue that more are guilty and complicit bc the obvious behavior didn’t deter the record labels, the fellow musicians, etc from working with him and through a lot of allegations. You can argue that if R Kelly was an average Joe, he would’ve been charged with this stuff from victim 1 and wouldn’t have skated any of this stuff.
There’s concrete evidence in this case. People itt comparing it to MJ, when it’s really not. Bill Cosby also I’m not familiar with the case, but it seems like his statement was a big part of it. So, yeah if he was coerced into a statement based on a deal that prosecution betrayed, he should be freed legally and was. But this is not the same thing. You have physical evidence and victim testimony.
Good note to end the thread on, please lock @op
“Just”
Here y'all go again, not going down this rabbit hole of you taking words literal and flipping them to make it seem like I implied something I didn't.
Probably the worst thread I’ve seen in a long time but I can’t look away either
the accuracy
Mix of emotions in all this. I was a huge fan of Kellz growing up. Hate to see him go out this way but at the end of the day it’s the victims who are important and he was a deviant who thrived on aggressive debauchery... sadly it seems a lot of it is lingering damage from his youth, but none of that excuses the fact he’s a serial rapist.
if the topic is about r kelly and the topic of rape and he's arguing for, abso f***ing lutely.
No matter the topic, that's a s***ty way to have a discourse lol.
Arguing between whether it's rape or statutory rape in regards to R Kelly is honestly irrelevant because not only did he knowingly engage in s***with minors, he also sexually abused and assaulted women and minors according to testimony during the trial.
Why argue between what kinda rape it was when he did both?
Arguing between whether it's rape or statutory rape in regards to R Kelly is honestly irrelevant because not only did he knowingly engage in s***with minors, he also sexually abused and assaulted women and minors according to testimony during the trial.
Why argue between what kinda rape it was when he did both?
Arguing between whether it's rape or statutory rape in regards to R Kelly is honestly irrelevant because not only did he knowingly engage in s***with minors, he also sexually abused and assaulted women and minors according to testimony during the trial.
Why argue between what kinda rape it was when he did both?
Mix of emotions in all this. I was a huge fan of Kellz growing up. Hate to see him go out this way but at the end of the day it’s the victims who are important and he was a deviant who thrived on aggressive debauchery... sadly it seems a lot of it is lingering damage from his youth, but none of that excuses the fact he’s a serial rapist.
He's a f***ing menace and it's a shame it took so long to get him. The piss tape should have done him in, if not the Aaliyah marriage
That being said, I will still listen to some of his songs
No matter the topic, that's a s***ty way to have a discourse lol.
"no matter the topic"
discussions about human rights and the other person is arguing against said human rights and you expecting reasonable discourse out of that is s***ty
Arguing between whether it's rape or statutory rape in regards to R Kelly is honestly irrelevant because not only did he knowingly engage in s***with minors, he also sexually abused and assaulted women and minors according to testimony during the trial.
Why argue between what kinda rape it was when he did both?
Man asked "did he hardcore rape her, or did she ask for it?" and was surprised on the emotional responses he got lol
Look. R Kelly is a talented guy but also obviously a piece of s*** and is mentally off. There’s no conspiracy here. People arguing about dumb s*** itt. The fact is when you’re up, it’s harder for people to be prosecuted, victims to come forward, and they also have more resources to fight off things. There’s more of a power dynamic and intimidation factor, and a machine behind him. Now that he’s down, both financially and culturally, and doesn’t have that machine with him, of course it’s open season. That doesn’t make him less of a piece of s*** and it doesn’t make him a martyr. If you want to argue something, you could argue that more are guilty and complicit bc the obvious behavior didn’t deter the record labels, the fellow musicians, etc from working with him and through a lot of allegations. You can argue that if R Kelly was an average Joe, he would’ve been charged with this stuff from victim 1 and wouldn’t have skated any of this stuff.
There’s concrete evidence in this case. People itt comparing it to MJ, when it’s really not. Bill Cosby also I’m not familiar with the case, but it seems like his statement was a big part of it. So, yeah if he was coerced into a statement based on a deal that prosecution betrayed, he should be freed legally and was. But this is not the same thing. You have physical evidence and victim testimony.
Great post
It’s just a weird distinction that really does not need to be made
They are legally two different things there's a difference between them. You can't even ask a question without it being a damn witch hunt f*** wrong w you niggas fr?
Man asked "did he hardcore rape her, or did she ask for it?" and was surprised on the emotional responses he got lol