Divorced dads indeed.
all jokes aside here, there is an incredibly clear correlation to voting habits here and its something we dont really talk about enough in political discourse. it's not simple as just "old divorced boomer likes trump to own lib women"
trumpies think the blackrock vid is proof of something nefarious😭😭
all jokes aside here, there is an incredibly clear correlation to voting habits here and its something we dont really talk about enough in political discourse. it's not simple as just "old divorced boomer likes trump to own lib women"
What is it then
Im pretty sure subconsciously thats a pretty big part of it
The amount of posts I’m seeing saying Trump is “black” now because he got shot and has a felony is ridiculous
Like do these people hear how dumb they sound
its just internet jokes but it sucks his supporters using it as validation
What is it then
Im pretty sure subconsciously thats a pretty big part of it
“Women need to shut up and stay in the f***ing kitchen.”
@Regard still ain't explained what a "DEI hire" is I really am curious and think he should share
“Women need to shut up and stay in the f***ing kitchen.”
Which comes from the same place of anger and insecurity
trumpies think the blackrock vid is proof of something nefarious😭😭
modern conspiracy theorists are so wack. no deep dives or overanalyzing of obscure documents/footage, just connect to very obvious, visible things and then declare it a "deep state conspiracy"
i saw a video of a guy claiming he knows who the shooter was working with, and it's a guy who is in full frame of the rally, like right behind trump, a little to the left. literally may have been the most visible person in the entire crowd.
I find it hilarious everyone in my small town are outraged by this but make no mistake if this happened to Joe Biden they'd be celebrating with fireworks lol
This also fails to mention more people are outraged by this then a teenage trans girl being literally butchered an dumped in a river here a few weeks ago
F***ed up place
What is it then
Im pretty sure subconsciously thats a pretty big part of it
people act like old men just blindly hate women not understanding that old men (and old women too) grew up in rapidly different times where the fabric of what it meant to literally live in society was different - and no, i do not mean this about anything related to social views/social issues, i mean these completely economically
consider that many older men grew up in a time where it was told to them holistically by all measures of society that their sole worth and value was the ability to attract a women and then provide for a family economically. over time, these norms have changed - consider that women could not even get credit cards legally until the mid-late 70s, and then in reality couldn't without their husbands until the 90s.
the idea of women having careers that actually competed with men - no less were equal to them - did not realy substantially enter mainstream public conscious until the 90s-00s; prior to this, yes feminist movement exists and women had jobs, but the mainstream association of men was still "breadwinner". the role of "head of household" was still seen as a primarily male job.
by that time of the late 90s, most boomers already had at least 1 child (in many cases multiple). imagine a situation where you - for at that point almost half a century - lived in a time where you were told your sole value was the ability to provide for your family, and then suddenly your wife starts to feel unhappy because they think they wasted their lives having a family rather than say, finishing college or pursuing a higher career
this isn't to blame women or social norms - it's just as understandable why women would feel that way, of course when you're told for 50 years that having a family is the sole thing to strive for so much so you don't even consider a career a possible reality but then suddenly 30 years later your daughter is able to be a PHD and CEO you start questioning your decisions yourself.
however this division between male and female boomers has been an intense cause of divorce. speak to almost any divorced boomer couple (shouldn't be hard, almost 2/3rds of boomer couples have at least 1 divorce) and you'll see some drips/inklings of this in virtually all of why they divorced - moreso because the vast majority of these divorces are initiated by the wife
the oversimplification of this is "men just want women to go back to being housewives" or "women just have more freedom to divorce abusive men" - and yes, these people exist of course. however there are swathes of old men who feel like men don't have a place in society because they legitimately don't know what it is if they can't be a head of household; this doesn't mean they literally want to be an authortiative household single income "dictator", it's that the idea of them being breadwinners to them isn't mutually exclusive to womens' rights, so they don't understand why the position has A) been deprecated and B) how to deal with that. Meanwhile, many older women view the openings of womens' freedoms as a path toward lives for both younger women and to an extent themselves to participate in alternate lives they wish they could have had opportunities for.
This is not actually a gendered topic, it's an economic one misconstrued as being about gender. Boomer men are going to be more willing to vote for candidates who espouse - NOT "traditional values" - but rather paths to returning to meaningful societal employment (not just having a job but having a job with material meaning/social effect). Boomer women on the contrary are going to be more willing to vote for candidates who espouse broader complementary social views that allow paths toward more ambigious economic freedoms.
people act like old men just blindly hate women not understanding that old men (and old women too) grew up in rapidly different times where the fabric of what it meant to literally live in society was different - and no, i do not mean this about anything related to social views/social issues, i mean these completely economically
consider that many older men grew up in a time where it was told to them holistically by all measures of society that their sole worth and value was the ability to attract a women and then provide for a family economically. over time, these norms have changed - consider that women could not even get credit cards legally until the mid-late 70s, and then in reality couldn't without their husbands until the 90s.
the idea of women having careers that actually competed with men - no less were equal to them - did not realy substantially enter mainstream public conscious until the 90s-00s; prior to this, yes feminist movement exists and women had jobs, but the mainstream association of men was still "breadwinner". the role of "head of household" was still seen as a primarily male job.
by that time of the late 90s, most boomers already had at least 1 child (in many cases multiple). imagine a situation where you - for at that point almost half a century - lived in a time where you were told your sole value was the ability to provide for your family, and then suddenly your wife starts to feel unhappy because they think they wasted their lives having a family rather than say, finishing college or pursuing a higher career
this isn't to blame women or social norms - it's just as understandable why women would feel that way, of course when you're told for 50 years that having a family is the sole thing to strive for so much so you don't even consider a career a possible reality but then suddenly 30 years later your daughter is able to be a PHD and CEO you start questioning your decisions yourself.
however this division between male and female boomers has been an intense cause of divorce. speak to almost any divorced boomer couple (shouldn't be hard, almost 2/3rds of boomer couples have at least 1 divorce) and you'll see some drips/inklings of this in virtually all of why they divorced - moreso because the vast majority of these divorces are initiated by the wife
the oversimplification of this is "men just want women to go back to being housewives" or "women just have more freedom to divorce abusive men" - and yes, these people exist of course. however there are swathes of old men who feel like men don't have a place in society because they legitimately don't know what it is if they can't be a head of household; this doesn't mean they literally want to be an authortiative household single income "dictator", it's that the idea of them being breadwinners to them isn't mutually exclusive to womens' rights, so they don't understand why the position has A) been deprecated and B) how to deal with that. Meanwhile, many older women view the openings of womens' freedoms as a path toward lives for both younger women and to an extent themselves to participate in alternate lives they wish they could have had opportunities for.
This is not actually a gendered topic, it's an economic one misconstrued as being about gender. Boomer men are going to be more willing to vote for candidates who espouse - NOT "traditional values" - but rather paths to returning to meaningful societal employment (not just having a job but having a job with material meaning/social effect). Boomer women on the contrary are going to be more willing to vote for candidates who espouse broader complementary social views that allow paths toward more ambigious economic freedoms.

Nah interesting take though tbh
people act like old men just blindly hate women not understanding that old men (and old women too) grew up in rapidly different times where the fabric of what it meant to literally live in society was different - and no, i do not mean this about anything related to social views/social issues, i mean these completely economically
consider that many older men grew up in a time where it was told to them holistically by all measures of society that their sole worth and value was the ability to attract a women and then provide for a family economically. over time, these norms have changed - consider that women could not even get credit cards legally until the mid-late 70s, and then in reality couldn't without their husbands until the 90s.
the idea of women having careers that actually competed with men - no less were equal to them - did not realy substantially enter mainstream public conscious until the 90s-00s; prior to this, yes feminist movement exists and women had jobs, but the mainstream association of men was still "breadwinner". the role of "head of household" was still seen as a primarily male job.
by that time of the late 90s, most boomers already had at least 1 child (in many cases multiple). imagine a situation where you - for at that point almost half a century - lived in a time where you were told your sole value was the ability to provide for your family, and then suddenly your wife starts to feel unhappy because they think they wasted their lives having a family rather than say, finishing college or pursuing a higher career
this isn't to blame women or social norms - it's just as understandable why women would feel that way, of course when you're told for 50 years that having a family is the sole thing to strive for so much so you don't even consider a career a possible reality but then suddenly 30 years later your daughter is able to be a PHD and CEO you start questioning your decisions yourself.
however this division between male and female boomers has been an intense cause of divorce. speak to almost any divorced boomer couple (shouldn't be hard, almost 2/3rds of boomer couples have at least 1 divorce) and you'll see some drips/inklings of this in virtually all of why they divorced - moreso because the vast majority of these divorces are initiated by the wife
the oversimplification of this is "men just want women to go back to being housewives" or "women just have more freedom to divorce abusive men" - and yes, these people exist of course. however there are swathes of old men who feel like men don't have a place in society because they legitimately don't know what it is if they can't be a head of household; this doesn't mean they literally want to be an authortiative household single income "dictator", it's that the idea of them being breadwinners to them isn't mutually exclusive to womens' rights, so they don't understand why the position has A) been deprecated and B) how to deal with that. Meanwhile, many older women view the openings of womens' freedoms as a path toward lives for both younger women and to an extent themselves to participate in alternate lives they wish they could have had opportunities for.
This is not actually a gendered topic, it's an economic one misconstrued as being about gender. Boomer men are going to be more willing to vote for candidates who espouse - NOT "traditional values" - but rather paths to returning to meaningful societal employment (not just having a job but having a job with material meaning/social effect). Boomer women on the contrary are going to be more willing to vote for candidates who espouse broader complementary social views that allow paths toward more ambigious economic freedoms.
How could you rightfully point the changing gender roles and dynamics and the effect this has and then say its not a gendered issue
Its a gendered issue because the divide is literally by gender lmao
Trump/Piece of Trump's Right Ear ticket otw
That piece of ear is gonna grow into another Trump
The Donnie we know is back!
Motherfucker couldn’t even last til his speech.
How could you rightfully point the changing gender roles and dynamics and the effect this has and then say its not a gendered issue
Its a gendered issue because the divide is literally by gender lmao
The Donnie we know is back!
if this is real, pathetic.
He’s lucky to be alive.
How could you rightfully point the changing gender roles and dynamics and the effect this has and then say its not a gendered issue
Its a gendered issue because the divide is literally by gender lmao
is that seriously all you took from that?
He’s right
His point is the the economic base is the primary point in determining how gender dynamics operate, not necessarily that gender doesn’t matter at all
men didn’t just wake up one day and decide to/to not be the primary breadwinners just based off policy change, and even then that policy change was rooted in how society organized its economy and how labor was extracted
gender dynamics and conflicts don’t just solely appear out of thin air or because one human has identifies as a male or women
Motherfucker couldn’t even last til his speech.
If Dems were smart the plan should have been the condemnation of violence until he slipped up. He slipped up. They should stop the pitiful replies now. But it’s the dems so…