Nov 23, 2023·1 reply
Nortthat “specific mark” would be consistent with how the rest of his f***ing body looked
Yeah, honestly anyone could have guessed something like this, it's easy to say "there's black and white spots there" when the whole body has these
Nov 23, 2023!https://youtu.be/SgMPe2-HBDQ?si=PHy0WFVl389S5Efg
spongebobSpoken like a father whose child was touched by a grown ass man
- Nort 💫Nov 23, 2023·1 replyTooooooooooot
Yeah, honestly anyone could have guessed something like this, it's easy to say "there's black and white spots there" when the whole body has these
looking into what you said, it turns out he only got a fraction of his description correct. this is not a serious thread whatsoever
Nov 23, 2023
im almost there
nomichael was robbed of his childhood i won’t go any further on this
So was R Kelly
- Nov 23, 2023·3 repliesNort
looking into what you said, it turns out he only got a fraction of his description correct. this is not a serious thread whatsoever
You can’t be serious. You think the child was gonna provide police with a 1:1 sketch of mj’s d***? He probably didn’t even want to remember what he saw if he did see it. The fact that most of it matched anyway is very telling.
- Nort 💫Nov 23, 2023·1 replyRANCH
You can’t be serious. You think the child was gonna provide police with a 1:1 sketch of mj’s d***? He probably didn’t even want to remember what he saw if he did see it. The fact that most of it matched anyway is very telling.
So if you read what I just said, or any of the actual facts about that case, you’d know his description didnt match most of it. It seems that the only part he got correct was something that was basically guaranteed to be there.
- Nov 23, 2023·1 replyRANCH
You can’t be serious. You think the child was gonna provide police with a 1:1 sketch of mj’s d***? He probably didn’t even want to remember what he saw if he did see it. The fact that most of it matched anyway is very telling.
The kid said he was circumsized but the autopsy report from 2009 said he wasn't.
- Nov 23, 2023·1 replyTooooooooooot
The kid said he was circumsized but the autopsy report from 2009 said he wasn't.
Bro these are children being exposed to a grown man’s weird looking p**** they don’t know the difference
- Nov 23, 2023·2 repliesNort
So if you read what I just said, or any of the actual facts about that case, you’d know his description didnt match most of it. It seems that the only part he got correct was something that was basically guaranteed to be there.
Spots on his d*** are not guaranteed to be there just cause of his condition stfu
If anything it was a risky guess that turned out to be right. Dude had spots on his p**** just like the child said. Why are we not giving the children the benefit of the doubt?
- Nort 💫Nov 23, 2023RANCH
Spots on his d*** are not guaranteed to be there just cause of his condition stfu
If anything it was a risky guess that turned out to be right. Dude had spots on his p**** just like the child said. Why are we not giving the children the benefit of the doubt?
his entire body had skin blotches, thats what vitiligo is. are you trolling or legitimately braindead?
- Nort 💫Nov 23, 2023·1 reply
lemme guess Mike also had two nipples
- Nov 23, 2023Nort
lemme guess Mike also had two nipples
Don’t have kids bro
- Nov 23, 2023·2 repliesRANCH
You can’t be serious. You think the child was gonna provide police with a 1:1 sketch of mj’s d***? He probably didn’t even want to remember what he saw if he did see it. The fact that most of it matched anyway is very telling.
He's lying anyway. The description did match, that's why his world-class lawyers told him to settle asap for 20M.
Nov 23, 2023
WRUOP obviously just wanted to troll its clear he dont care about nothing and made up his mind before creating this thread, now hes looking for like minded idiots to 'have fun' with making tarded parallels with current events trying to find 'leaps in logic' and whatever other troll s***
Nov 23, 2023RANCHSpots on his d*** are not guaranteed to be there just cause of his condition stfu
If anything it was a risky guess that turned out to be right. Dude had spots on his p**** just like the child said. Why are we not giving the children the benefit of the doubt?
the fact that these children were even put into a position where they had to sketch a grown man’s d*** is f***ing horrifying
those kids were victims whether MJ touched them or not
- Nort 💫Nov 23, 2023·1 replyMidzy
He's lying anyway. The description did match, that's why his world-class lawyers told him to settle asap for 20M.
i’m lying? did the autopsy report lie as well? chandlers description didn’t match.
Nov 23, 2023idk but he was probably a weirdo even if he didn't do anything
- Nov 23, 2023·1 replyNort
i’m lying? did the autopsy report lie as well? chandlers description didn’t match.
How are you saying it didn't match when there was no trial because they instantly paid them $20m after the description lmao
Nov 23, 2023SlutdogStans when Michael Jackson sleeps in the same bed as children he's not related to:
lmao
- Nov 23, 2023RANCH
Bro these are children being exposed to a grown man’s weird looking p**** they don’t know the difference
So you're basically saying this drawing can't be considered as a legit piece of evidence in that case then
Nov 23, 2023Putting aside speculations about whether he touched the kids or not, the man clearly displayed unbalanced and inappropriate behavior. That is not debatable. I would never allow any child of mine to share a bed with a stranger.
- Nov 23, 2023
Nov 23, 2023No
- Nov 23, 2023
absolutely
- Nov 23, 2023·edited
No and i never will
But i will say with all due respect he’s an idiot for hanging with those kids he pretty much set himself up for failure
