People who claim this life as a simulation explain this

Page 7 of 7
Reply
  • Jul 6, 2020
    Reply
    westtoronto125

    Humans have been this developed before. There a theory theory is that every planet that develops intelligent life like us eventually gets too ego driven and ends up destroying itself until its extinct. And the process begins again.

    We dont see space travel, because every civilization ever, killed itself out before developing to that point.

    Name of this theory? I wanna look into it.

  • Jul 6, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Reply
    Scooter
    !https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOcPHOJ7GAQ

    Its literally unexplainable, and we have no idea why it does this.

    Read the wiki on this too.

    Not really a glitch, we just dont fully understand quantum mechanics.

    Electrons inside of atoms act the same way (having general predictability, but not precise). Graphics APIs can use similar guess work.

  • Jul 6, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Reply
    d stoner

    Read the wiki on this too.

    Not really a glitch, we just dont fully understand quantum mechanics.

    Electrons inside of atoms act the same way (having general predictability, but not precise). Graphics APIs can use similar guess work.

    The particles changing their shape based on whether or not they were being recorded in the future is nuts. It's like they know when they're going to be recorded and act on it that makes no sense.

  • Jul 6, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Reply
    Scooter

    The particles changing their shape based on whether or not they were being recorded in the future is nuts. It's like they know when they're going to be recorded and act on it that makes no sense.

    The detector they used probably effected it.

  • Jul 6, 2020
    Reply
    Puma

    Proof this isn’t a simulation:

    This just further proves we’re in a simulation

  • Jul 6, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Reply
    TwoDee

    Bro nobody knows anything.

    Everything is made up.

    There is no good or bad. Just... is

    So be kind and maybe I’ll share the cheat codes with you 😉

    theres definitely a good and bad

    bad things make you feel bad, gives you a feeling of guilt. thers consequences

    good makes you feel good, a sense of accomplishment. there's rewards

  • Jul 6, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Reply
    d stoner

    Nothing in OP disproves a simulation theory

    Complexity doesnt mean anything.

    The biggest proof of this NOT being a simulation is a lack of bugs and glitches (and updates, a sim this big aint getting updates?)

    we have been gettin updates

    have you not been paying attention to our cars? have you seen the ps5 announcement

    spider man morales

  • Jul 6, 2020
    Reply
    Ooo

    How do you define a glitch?

    It’s not even about complexity. It’s just things that are what they are

    big foot is a glitch. left over data from the last simutation

  • Jul 6, 2020
    Reply
    CNA Lov3ly

    we have been gettin updates

    have you not been paying attention to our cars? have you seen the ps5 announcement

    spider man morales

    Final update must've been the content creator

  • Jul 6, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Reply
    CNA Lov3ly

    theres definitely a good and bad

    bad things make you feel bad, gives you a feeling of guilt. thers consequences

    good makes you feel good, a sense of accomplishment. there's rewards

    what’s good to you can be considered bad to someone else is what I’m getting at. Not feelings

  • Jul 6, 2020
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    Reply
    TwoDee

    what’s good to you can be considered bad to someone else is what I’m getting at. Not feelings

    can you give us an example??

  • Jul 6, 2020
    Reply
    CNA Lov3ly

    can you give us an example??

    New technology may be good and exciting for you but bad and tedious for the people that build it.

  • Jul 6, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Reply
    d stoner

    The detector they used probably effected it.

    Tons of people have tried this and it doesn't change. They would literally delay the recording till after the particle went through the slit and before it would hit the wall to decide if they were going to record it or not and it would still change based on if it was going to be watched, like the particles knew. It's a lot deeper than the detector affecting it

  • Jul 6, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Reply
    Scooter

    Tons of people have tried this and it doesn't change. They would literally delay the recording till after the particle went through the slit and before it would hit the wall to decide if they were going to record it or not and it would still change based on if it was going to be watched, like the particles knew. It's a lot deeper than the detector affecting it

    I mean i didnt even know about the s*** until last night

    Im sure in 100 years we'll have a clearer understanding of its behaviour

  • Jul 6, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Reply
    d stoner

    I mean i didnt even know about the s*** until last night

    Im sure in 100 years we'll have a clearer understanding of its behaviour

    Hope so... Or maybe we'll never be able to understand in this simulation

  • Jul 6, 2020
    Reply
    Scooter

    Hope so... Or maybe we'll never be able to understand in this simulation

    For now, im still saying the recorded test is flawed in some manner.

    Or maybe a tree falling in the forest doesnt make a sound if nobody is around to hear it

1
...
6
7