Apr 1pharrell been lame for awhile what a shame
Apr 1
Craig MacDonalds*** clickbait you're a loser @op
In a statement to Billboard on Monday, a rep for Pharrell said there had been no ill-intent behind the disputed trademark filings: “Pharrell is surprised by this. We have reached out on multiple occasions to share in the ownership and administration of the trademark and will continue to make that offer. The goal here was to make sure a third party doesn’t get a hold of the trademark and to guarantee Chad and Pharrell share in ownership and administration.”
breaking:
guy who got caught screwing over his business partner is saying it was just an accident to cover his own ass
Apr 1·1 replyKelis really called Chad an amoeba
Apr 1·1 replyCraig MacDonalds*** clickbait you're a loser @op
In a statement to Billboard on Monday, a rep for Pharrell said there had been no ill-intent behind the disputed trademark filings: “Pharrell is surprised by this. We have reached out on multiple occasions to share in the ownership and administration of the trademark and will continue to make that offer. The goal here was to make sure a third party doesn’t get a hold of the trademark and to guarantee Chad and Pharrell share in ownership and administration.”
Did you even read the entire article?
''In his legal filings last week, Hugo’s attorneys argued that Pharrell had “knowingly and intentionally” filed those applications without required input from Hugo, even though he was “fully aware” that either Hugo or their partnership entity should have been listed as a co-owner: “Nothing, either written or oral, provided Williams or PW IP Holdings with the unilateral authority to register the trademarks.”
Hugo’s attorneys said they’ve “repeatedly” contacted Pharrell’s team about the problem, and that the star’s lawyers had “admitted that Hugo is equal co-owner of the trademarks” and promised to include him — a claim that lines up with Williams’ statement on Monday.
But the case claims that sharing never actually happened, partly because Pharrell’s company has insisted on “onerous business terms” that would deprive Hugo of proper control and compensation.''
Apr 1Craig MacDonalds*** clickbait you're a loser @op
In a statement to Billboard on Monday, a rep for Pharrell said there had been no ill-intent behind the disputed trademark filings: “Pharrell is surprised by this. We have reached out on multiple occasions to share in the ownership and administration of the trademark and will continue to make that offer. The goal here was to make sure a third party doesn’t get a hold of the trademark and to guarantee Chad and Pharrell share in ownership and administration.”
nah if u read the full article it's pretty clear he was doing some slimy s*** and is now trying to pivot and back off
- Apr 1Zack From The Six
Did you even read the entire article?
''In his legal filings last week, Hugo’s attorneys argued that Pharrell had “knowingly and intentionally” filed those applications without required input from Hugo, even though he was “fully aware” that either Hugo or their partnership entity should have been listed as a co-owner: “Nothing, either written or oral, provided Williams or PW IP Holdings with the unilateral authority to register the trademarks.”
Hugo’s attorneys said they’ve “repeatedly” contacted Pharrell’s team about the problem, and that the star’s lawyers had “admitted that Hugo is equal co-owner of the trademarks” and promised to include him — a claim that lines up with Williams’ statement on Monday.
But the case claims that sharing never actually happened, partly because Pharrell’s company has insisted on “onerous business terms” that would deprive Hugo of proper control and compensation.''
it’s over @Mitchell
- Apr 1·2 replies
Ron MexicoI don't really like Pharrell that much
Phenomenal musician, sketchy human
How is Pharrell a sketchy human
Apr 1·1 replyI thought this was an April fools
Yeah with whatever happened with Chad that made him step back I could see this
Lowkey makes me wonder if those “Neptunes” beats that were dropping recently were just Pharrell
Apr 1
MozumozuReminder that pharrell was a high class male escort in Guyana where he was taught to fist fight by a slave
Apr 1Damn
- Apr 1·2 replies2words
I thought this was an April fools
Yeah with whatever happened with Chad that made him step back I could see this
Lowkey makes me wonder if those “Neptunes” beats that were dropping recently were just Pharrell
i mean.. take a look at the credits on the 2017 NERD album & it should be obvious
Apr 1·3 repliesPharrell's solo production is so f***ing trash
- Apr 1·1 replyImAUsernameLike
i mean.. take a look at the credits on the 2017 NERD album & it should be obvious
Oh yeah I know that ofc
But I’m talking about the pandemic era beats that were credited to The Neptunes, not NERD with pharrell as the writer/producer
Apr 1·1 replyApril fools?
- Apr 1·1 reply
Apr 1·1 replyFirst order of business on this new account is to remove op and his horrible bait from my line of sight
- Apr 12words
https://ktt2.com/what-happened-to-chad-hugo-93958
He produced problematic
- Apr 1·1 reply2words
Oh yeah I know that ofc
But I’m talking about the pandemic era beats that were credited to The Neptunes, not NERD with pharrell as the writer/producer
yea i wouldn’t put it past Pharrell to claim “The Neptunes” production on his solo work, especially considering this thread’s topic & the fact that nearly every song on the last NERD album was Pharrell solo production
- Apr 1newaccount42069
First order of business on this new account is to remove op and his horrible bait from my line of sight
hold up, where’s the bait?
- Apr 1ImAUsernameLike
yea i wouldn’t put it past Pharrell to claim “The Neptunes” production on his solo work, especially considering this thread’s topic & the fact that nearly every song on the last NERD album was Pharrell solo production
That’s honestly f***ed up
He must have got tired of not being able to use The Neptunes name and prestige because of whatever happened with Chad that made him stop producing
Nuja 🫶🏾Apr 1·1 replyCraig MacDonalds*** clickbait you're a loser @op
In a statement to Billboard on Monday, a rep for Pharrell said there had been no ill-intent behind the disputed trademark filings: “Pharrell is surprised by this. We have reached out on multiple occasions to share in the ownership and administration of the trademark and will continue to make that offer. The goal here was to make sure a third party doesn’t get a hold of the trademark and to guarantee Chad and Pharrell share in ownership and administration.”
Thank you for this
Apr 1·2 repliesCraig MacDonalds*** clickbait you're a loser @op
In a statement to Billboard on Monday, a rep for Pharrell said there had been no ill-intent behind the disputed trademark filings: “Pharrell is surprised by this. We have reached out on multiple occasions to share in the ownership and administration of the trademark and will continue to make that offer. The goal here was to make sure a third party doesn’t get a hold of the trademark and to guarantee Chad and Pharrell share in ownership and administration.”
ok we backbut still
justice for Kelis
Apr 1MozumozuClap along if you feel that Israel should exist
Because I’m happpppyyyyy
Clap along if you feel no way about the Gaza Strip
Because I’m happpyyyy
man- Apr 1
rustcohlestanfirst the neptunes break up, now everyday i wake up, somebody gotta problem with hov 🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️
- Apr 1Mozumozu
Reminder that pharrell was a high class male escort in Guyana where he was taught to fist fight by a slave
link