Did anybody post the reviewer’s picture ITT as yet? And if so, was it a white person with glasses?

how do you properly review a double album after 2 days
Don’t they get the album in advance
Did anybody post the reviewer’s picture ITT as yet? And if so, was it a white person with glasses?

In the end, it doesn’t really bother me. My life isn’t affected at all by a s***ty publication giving a s***ty score. This album is worth more then a critics opinion. People look for validation from things like this like their opinion isn’t valid enough. But in the case of this album it’s true for a lot of you.
how do you properly review a double album after 2 days
this is why they (traditional publications in general) have to update reviews as time goes on because they rush to get a review out.
In the end, it doesn’t really bother me. My life isn’t affected at all by a s***ty publication giving a s***ty score. This album is worth more then a critics opinion. People look for validation from things like this like their opinion isn’t valid enough. But in the case of this album it’s true for a lot of you.
7. 6 is not a s***ty score
10 = classic
9 = alright
8 = mediocre
7 and below = trash
8.3 BNM - Throw the whole album away
i was close
https://twitter.com/margielatabiz/status/1524995992449437697The nerd who wrote the review as soon as he pressed submit:
7. 6 is not a s***ty score
This album was better then DAMN and that got a 9.2. In the context of pitchfork it’s a s***ty score. In the context of other places its not too bad.
7. 6 is not a s***ty score
Umm, hello?
Didn’t you see AAAAAAAAAA’s rating system?
10 years from now this is gonna be seen as Kendrick's hidden gem and I'm here for it
sadly but real ones know this one of his best projects
Funny seeing y’all bent over critics but I really hate when people say 8.4 out of 10. Like just say a number and be on with it no need to break it down further lmao
real
honestly assigning numeric value to art in general is kinda stupid imo which is why i don't rate anything nowadays s*** kinda arbitrary
This album was better then DAMN and that got a 9.2. In the context of pitchfork it’s a s***ty score. In the context of other places its not too bad.
9.2 was a bad score
This album was better then DAMN and that got a 9.2. In the context of pitchfork it’s a s***ty score. In the context of other places its not too bad.
However you put it 7.6 out of 10 is not a s***ty score
real
honestly assigning numeric value to art in general is kinda stupid imo which is why i don't rate anything nowadays s*** kinda arbitrary