QALF

2y

Would be horrible timing lmao.

LongLiveHipHop

2y

https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna37883955

Boi-1da's Story Picture @starsixtyseven

BulletProof

2y

I thought it was just a term for someone who isn’t at war with Kendrick

Duddas

2y

what’s that mean

starsixtyseven

2y

nah man how ppl find out about these things 😭

starsixtyseven

2y

Someone post 1da story

Nix

2y

The album may not be that good(haven't heard it yet), but people just have low attention spans these days

ThatGuyChike

2y

post it yourself g

Nix

2y

The album may not be that good(haven't heard it yet), but people just have low attention spans these days

Duddas

2y

I mean it’s just short
12 tracks isn’t enough for any album IMO

star67x

2y

It’s not that it isn’t good, I don’t think it’s ass but the anticipation is always high with Kendrick because of the time he takes and coming off the heels of having his biggest moment - I feel inherently even his biggest fans are kinda scratching their heads if this is all he got 🤷🏿‍♂️

Nix

2y

NLU will forever be his biggest moment

starsixtyseven

2y

nah I’m worried I would doxx myself, that’s why I leave it to the professionals @LongLiveHipHop and @Jetfuel

OVO Steve Carell

2y

"Everything you say online is subject to an instant system of rewards. Every platform comes with metrics; you can precisely quantify how well-received your thoughts are by how many likes or shares or retweets they receive. For almost everyone, the game is difficult to resist: they end up trying to say the things that the machine will like. For all the panic over online censorship, this stuff is far more destructive. You have no free speech—not because someone might ban your account, but because there’s a vast incentive structure in place that constantly channels your speech in certain directions. And unlike overt censorship, it’s not a policy that could ever be changed, but a pure function of the connectivity of the internet itself. This might be why so much writing that comes out of the internet is so unbearably dull, cycling between outrage and mockery, begging for clicks, speaking the machine back into its own bowels."

"This incentive system can lead to very vicious results. A few years ago, a friend realized that if she were murdered—if some obsessed loner shot her dead in the street—then there were hundreds of people who would celebrate. She’d seen similar things happen enough times. They would spend a day competing to make exultant jokes about her death, and then they would all move on to something else. My friend was not a particularly famous or controversial person: she had some followers and some bylines, but probably her most divisive article had been about tax policy. But she was just famous enough for hundreds of people, who she didn’t know and had never met, to hate her and want to see her dead. It wasn’t even that they had different political opinions: plenty of these people were on the same side. They would laugh at her death in the name of their shared commitment to justice and liberation and a better future for all."

starsixtyseven

2y

Damn where this from

OVO Steve Carell

2y

"Everything you say online is subject to an instant system of rewards. Every platform comes with metrics; you can precisely quantify how well-received your thoughts are by how many likes or shares or retweets they receive. For almost everyone, the game is difficult to resist: they end up trying to say the things that the machine will like. For all the panic over online censorship, this stuff is far more destructive. You have no free speech—not because someone might ban your account, but because there’s a vast incentive structure in place that constantly channels your speech in certain directions. And unlike overt censorship, it’s not a policy that could ever be changed, but a pure function of the connectivity of the internet itself. This might be why so much writing that comes out of the internet is so unbearably dull, cycling between outrage and mockery, begging for clicks, speaking the machine back into its own bowels."

"This incentive system can lead to very vicious results. A few years ago, a friend realized that if she were murdered—if some obsessed loner shot her dead in the street—then there were hundreds of people who would celebrate. She’d seen similar things happen enough times. They would spend a day competing to make exultant jokes about her death, and then they would all move on to something else. My friend was not a particularly famous or controversial person: she had some followers and some bylines, but probably her most divisive article had been about tax policy. But she was just famous enough for hundreds of people, who she didn’t know and had never met, to hate her and want to see her dead. It wasn’t even that they had different political opinions: plenty of these people were on the same side. They would laugh at her death in the name of their shared commitment to justice and liberation and a better future for all."

onyx

2y

ovo steve carell is who kendrick thinks he is

onyx

2y

ovo steve carell is who kendrick thinks he is