You're the one saying this will usher in some new era of Ukrainian bigotry towards Russia. You can't now call me the ahistorical one. You're contradicting yourself
Huh?
Civilians deaths in Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia means less than Civilan deaths in Ukraine from the position of the US.
It's 2022 and race is still an issue. Disgusting.
Not only the US. Also Europe
Biden is such a hypocritic how can he condemn the assault on Civilians when he was part of the Obama administration where Barack was using drones like a Call Of Duty player.
The superpowers only care bout their own gain. They playing a geopolitical game
Civilians deaths in Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia means less than Civilan deaths in Ukraine from the position of the US.
It's 2022 and race is still an issue. Disgusting.
Pakistan? What happened there?
Civilians deaths in Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia means less than Civilan deaths in Ukraine from the position of the US.
It's 2022 and race is still an issue. Disgusting.
bruh why're you acting as though race tensions weren't at their highest for the last several years and longer. it is still an issue and it will be the issue for the next hundred years
oh and if you read this as me being racist then please feel free to not respond
bruh why're you acting as though race tensions weren't at their highest for the last several years and longer. it is still an issue and it will be the issue for the next hundred years
oh and if you read this as me being racist then please feel free to not respond
i was just expressing my disgust, and how the f*** can your message be considered racist you're demonstrating how big of an issue it still is.
you need a bowl of valium soup and a binge on xnxx or xhamster to chill your ass down before making unfounded, ignornant, arrognant, baseless assumptions on a user just shedding light on the hypocrisy from Biden's media address.
Civilians deaths in Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia means less than Civilan deaths in Ukraine from the position of the US.
It's 2022 and race is still an issue. Disgusting.
Craziest stat I ever read was that of the 377,000 deaths in the NATO-sponsored Yemeni Civil War, 70% of those are children under 5 years old. Thats 264,000 babies. At this pace it will reach 1,300,000 by 2030.
F*** NATO and F*** Saudi Arabia.
I really wanna know what the Saudi leaders have on the US. It's weird that they have tons of oil but we haven't brought them "democracy" yet
because that regime best represents the interests of USG and oil companies on the arabian peninsula
not just, or rather exactly, because they have always played ball with us, or because their autocratic control over Saudi Arabia is ideal for facilitating control over the oil supply [although both are true[, but because they have, for much of their recent existence, owed their continued political survival to the support of USG
the House of Saud are not only incredibly corrupt but also considered by the populist movements of the peninsula to be insufficiently Islamic and far too Westernized already. if the people of Saudi Arabia had their way almost no one would prefer the status quo.
so USG likes them because both parties know that the house of saud serves at the pleasure of USG, and gives USG what they want while saud gets what it wants
but with the rise of China as a global power suddenly the Saudis are feeling their oats and thinking they might be able to switch to a new daddy
so as @Scratchin_Bandit basically said, dont be surprised if, should the house of saud suddenly try and leave their controlling partner, USG goes total "if i cant have you no one can" mode
Start the rapture now man
whats the likelihood everything we've been seeing (basically just Tweets tbf) about the imminent russian collapse, soviet equipment, genocide, USSR revival, Europe is next, zelensky deification, massive ru losses, WW3 etc is a deliberate US misinformation effort so that when ukraine does surrender and accepts neutrality and russia goes home the natoheads can still spin it as "actually this is a loss for putler you see he didnt get what he wanted!"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drone_strikes_in_Pakistan
AH, true. Although, North-west Pakistan isn’t really, Pakistan Pakistan. It’s like a shared tribal area between Pakistan & Afghanistan, the ethnicities in that region mostly govern themselves. Obviously tragic, as innocents DID get murdered (and not just the “boogiemen” they were hunting for).
A drone strike in proper Pakistan (cities, and s***), would not be a smart idea. It’s a nuclear country.
whats the likelihood everything we've been seeing (basically just Tweets tbf) about the imminent russian collapse, soviet equipment, genocide, USSR revival, Europe is next, zelensky deification, massive ru losses, WW3 etc is a deliberate US misinformation effort so that when ukraine does surrender and accepts neutrality and russia goes home the natoheads can still spin it as "actually this is a loss for putler you see he didnt get what he wanted!"
100% but its not even as clear-cut as it being oriented in preparation for that specific outcome
the overarching goal of the information war, and the tactic of flooding the zone with bullshit, is basically to create such a fog of uncertainty that you can frame any given outcome any way you want
whats the likelihood everything we've been seeing (basically just Tweets tbf) about the imminent russian collapse, soviet equipment, genocide, USSR revival, Europe is next, zelensky deification, massive ru losses, WW3 etc is a deliberate US misinformation effort so that when ukraine does surrender and accepts neutrality and russia goes home the natoheads can still spin it as "actually this is a loss for putler you see he didnt get what he wanted!"
I think it's more so a misinformation campaign aimed to justify sanctions & weapon sales etc
That PUTLER LOST HE TOOK A BIG FAT L shyt is just copium, it serves no real purpose other than libs not getting their feelings hurt
So let’s say Kiev accepts, no NATO & EU.
What’s to stop Ukraine from turning around after 10-15 years and accepting?
So let’s say Kiev accepts, no NATO & EU.
What’s to stop Ukraine from turning around after 10-15 years and accepting?
Anither Russian invasion
If they feel that’s not a threat then nothing
Biden is such a hypocritic how can he condemn the assault on Civilians when he was part of the Obama administration where Barack was using drones like a Call Of Duty player.
First of all, obviously Biden isn’t going to condemn his OWN actions.
Good luck finding ANY politician in the world that will.
You could make the case that European nations that didn’t condemn Obama/Biden are being hypocritical right now.
However, would you instead prefer consistency? I think this could be a turning point for war crimes in general for all countries going forward where nobody accepts this s*** anymore regardless of victim. At least there’s hope for global change.
So let’s say Kiev accepts, no NATO & EU.
What’s to stop Ukraine from turning around after 10-15 years and accepting?
The NATO offer looks like it's already off of the table, so I don't see why that would change. As for the EU, 10-15yrs of peace with Russia is threatened to be upended over the question of joining the EU? I doubt Ukrainians will want to go through this again just for another "but maybe they'll accept us
"
So let’s say Kiev accepts, no NATO & EU.
What’s to stop Ukraine from turning around after 10-15 years and accepting?
Nothing. Putin and his regime aren’t eternal.
because that regime best represents the interests of USG and oil companies on the arabian peninsula
not just, or rather exactly, because they have always played ball with us, or because their autocratic control over Saudi Arabia is ideal for facilitating control over the oil supply [although both are true[, but because they have, for much of their recent existence, owed their continued political survival to the support of USG
the House of Saud are not only incredibly corrupt but also considered by the populist movements of the peninsula to be insufficiently Islamic and far too Westernized already. if the people of Saudi Arabia had their way almost no one would prefer the status quo.
so USG likes them because both parties know that the house of saud serves at the pleasure of USG, and gives USG what they want while saud gets what it wants
but with the rise of China as a global power suddenly the Saudis are feeling their oats and thinking they might be able to switch to a new daddy
so as @Scratchin_Bandit basically said, dont be surprised if, should the house of saud suddenly try and leave their controlling partner, USG goes total "if i cant have you no one can" mode
So do you disagree with the nuclear implications being a legitimate impediment?
So do you disagree with the nuclear implications being a legitimate impediment?
im unsure what you mean, could you flesh it out a bit
i was just expressing my disgust, and how the f*** can your message be considered racist you're demonstrating how big of an issue it still is.
you need a bowl of valium soup and a binge on xnxx or xhamster to chill your ass down before making unfounded, ignornant, arrognant, baseless assumptions on a user just shedding light on the hypocrisy from Biden's media address.
you need a bowl of valium soup and a binge on xnxx or xhamster to chill your ass
hell to the yea. I came off harsh, im sorry