Nah just mentioned it in a short clause, since they're in fact state owned, which can be important since they're conveying the message of the Kremlin

I didn't say state owned media is worse. In this case, in this conflict, the corporate owned media you mentioned been a more reliable source. I'm not saying the NY Times is always more reliable, not at all imo

The point is that it's been proven that Russia uses 'actors' as an excuse. There are people proven to be dead from ealier attacks. Russia said they were actors too. That's the real argument. RT uses Kremlin propaganda points

I haven't been reading RT at all during this conflict so I wouldn't know, but this view about RT has been a thing way before, and it was bullshit back then too

No it's not state media it's uhh media directly funded by citizens taxes.. but it's different.... bc it's us.. don't you trust us?.. don't you have FAITH?

Harrassing who exactly? Ukrainian national police? Biden? S*** is a joke lol

LMAO WTF

who bombed who bro???? is russia still at it?

sidenote not relevant to the tweet but this man was correct once in his life

Russian tg channels saw bbc calling zhirinovsky a 'clown' and went on an absolute SPREE calling Kamala Harris and Tim Cook racial/homophobic slurs 'in retaliation'

is this really the hill these people want to die on, capping for some right-wing dead bozo

Are Russia and China the only countries that get that tag? What about Venezuela or Iran?

You know Putin's propaganda is smarter than that lol, Russian media inside Russia is very different than Russian media meant for foreign audiences like RT.

Telesur doesn't

Dont know about Venezuela, but Iran’s Press TV has the tag

about.fb.com/news/2020/06/labeling-state-controlled-media/amp

On YouTube you get the tag "teleSUR is funded in whole or in part by multiple Latin American governments."

Yeah bombed a train station and civilians again

oh nah its a Russian channel through and through, I was familiar with it even before war. its not really a news outlet, just something I saw

Oh please @op you can’t put slogans that stem from a Nazi collaborator in your title, especially as someone who’s NOT Ukrainian

Slava ukraini originated around the first war of independence in 1919. Bandera and Co said it, but it predates them and was already popular

First of all heroiam slava was originated by Bandera not the Ukrainian counterrevolutionaries in the 1920s, second of all this is also literally what Nazis say about use of symbols from the German empire lol

When people use the swastika do they use it out of respect for the Norse?

The swastika is a Buddhist symbol and was also deliberately altered into a new thing. You can use the OG Buddhist swastika and they shouldn't have to give it up cause of some a******s

Same applies here

Can just remove heroiam slava. Done

Also the German empire doesn't exist anymore and nazis wanted to restore it, ukraine exists now.