Russia also accused of stirring up tension in Kosovo, Bosnia
Russian Mayor of Kherson allegedly poisoned by his Ukrainian chef and is now in a coma (lol)
standard.co.uk/news/world/ukraine-kherson-vladimir-saldo-russia-poisoned-chef-b1017166.html
This is extremely bad. Seriously. No points to be svored. Bad situation
This sounds a lot like the last time Ukraine tried to fake a nuclear disaster to get a NFZ in like March
Officially retracted. Because it was wrong, and the Russian narrative penetrated the media
Crickets itt
This sounds a lot like the last time Ukraine tried to fake a nuclear disaster to get a NFZ in like March
A no fly zone will do nothing once the bombs are planted or the reactor goes bad. Ukraine are being legit. A NFZ does nothing to help this situation
UN been warning about it too
A no fly zone will do nothing once the bombs are planted or the reactor goes bad. Ukraine are being legit. A NFZ does nothing to help this situation
UN been warning about it too
Completely missing my point apparently
And why would Russia bomb a nuclear plant that they control lol
Destroy a nuclear plant you control just before having referendums on annexation in the same region brehs
Completely missing my point apparently
And why would Russia bomb a nuclear plant that they control lol
Because they’re stupid.
Destroy a nuclear plant you control just before having referendums on annexation in the same region brehs
'Give us zaporizhia and/or back off or your nuclear plant gets it'
'Give us zaporizhia and/or back off or your nuclear plant gets it'
And have the wind carry it to Russia
Because they’re stupid.
But I thought they were cunning geniuses that are able to bend the will of everyone from your average American to major media institutions and government officials using nothing but Facebook?
'Give us zaporizhia and/or back off or your nuclear plant gets it'
Russia controls the nuclear plant tho, it’s de facto their nuclear plant
Officially retracted. Because it was wrong, and the Russian narrative penetrated the media
Did they say they removed it because it was was fact checked and deemed incorrect or was it because of pressure from emotional Pro-Ukraine accounts? Also, has that portion of the documentary with the quote been deleted out and/or have a correction in it?
All i see is that they said they removed a tweet. U.S news sources (as much as i've known) make sure to note it was wrong if it was proven incorrect. They don't leave it for guessing.
All the tweet did was quote the doc lol it wasn't the actual source material
Did they say they removed it because it was was fact checked and deemed incorrect or was it because of pressure from emotional Pro-Ukraine accounts? Also, has that portion of the documentary with the quote been deleted out and/or have a correction in it?
All i see is that they said they removed a tweet. U.S news sources (as much as i've known) make sure to note it was wrong if it was proven incorrect. They don't leave it for guessing.
All the tweet did was quote the doc lol it wasn't the actual source material
The claim was ALWAYS unsubstantiated
But I thought they were cunning geniuses that are able to bend the will of everyone from your average American to major media institutions and government officials using nothing but Facebook?
You’re obviously arguing in bad faith.
Neither of these "controversial" posts recently are new. WashPo reported what Amnesty said in March and there's been first hand accounts of them doing these things for months
washingtonpost.com/world/2022/03/28/ukraine-kyiv-russia-civilians
Over the past month, Washington Post journalists have witnessed Ukrainian antitank rockets, antiaircraft guns and armored personnel carriers placed near apartment buildings. In one vacant lot, Post journalists spotted a truck carrying a Grad multiple rocket launcher.
A Human Rights Watch worker IN Ukraine:
The Ukrainian military has “a responsibility under international law” to remove their forces and equipment from civilian-populated areas, and if that is not possible, to move civilians out of those areas, Weir said.
“If they don’t do that, that is a violation of the laws of war,” he added. “Because what they are doing is they are putting civilians at risk. Because all that military equipment are legitimate targets.”
And for the CBS one, 100% of the weapons couldn't possibly make it to their destinations with the dangers they face in route, staying in storage (military target), ending up in the black market, or confiscated.
30% sounds shocking but 50-60% wouldn't be a shock at all. Russia occasionally bombs weapon storages and military infrastructure. The West also doesn't deliver these weapons themselves, they usually pass it off in Poland and have shown concern themselves about the arms. And how many times have we seen troops complaining about lack of weapons even just after new shipments? We all know they somehow aren't getting enough on the battlefield
edition.cnn.com/2022/04/19/politics/us-weapons-ukraine-intelligence/index.html
These types of figures are entirely impossible to determine
These types of figures are entirely impossible to determine
Russia's self reported number is pretty high as well
You’re obviously arguing in bad faith.
I’m just repeating claims that you’ve made on here repeatedly