Don't cap, people were treating soldiers being called orcs like it was a war crime
Orc is non human
C***is still human
There is a difference
God I hope fire burns the smirks off these fascist pigs
Wagner group belong in spliffs
No one believes this bullshjt anymore
The real mistake was not admitting them to the bloc in 2007
If Lithuania hadn't joined nato it would already be gone
No one believes this bullshjt anymore
The real mistake was not admitting them to the bloc in 2007
If Lithuania hadn't joined nato it would already be gone
So the current line of strategy for NATO is using the Ukrainian people as cannon fodder for their geopolitical ambitions against Russia
Why extend even nominal Support for NATO
So the current line of strategy for NATO is using the Ukrainian people as cannon fodder for their geopolitical ambitions against Russia
Why extend even nominal Support for NATO
No it simply isn't that's f***ing stupid
Sure nato has an interest in Russia not gaining power, but this is kind of complicated by the fact the ukrianians now want nato, they want nato weapons and they want security
Stop denying them agency
No it simply isn't that's f***ing stupid
Sure nato has an interest in Russia not gaining power, but this is kind of complicated by the fact the ukrianians now want nato, they want nato weapons and they want security
Stop denying them agency
Yeah and nato is happily giving them those so they may be cannon fodder against the Russians
Yeah and nato is happily giving them those so they may be cannon fodder against the Russians
Just cause nato has an interest doesn't mean this is bad, the Ukrainians want them so nato provides. It would be way more immoral to let them get steamrolled by Tsar Sauron
I can't believe Zelensky is spreading Russian propaganda
I can't believe Zelensky is spreading Russian propaganda
Maybe revealing that Ukraine wouldn't join nato would have actually emboldened the Russians to invade ukraine earlier
They wouldn't just let a fairly pro western Ukrainian government just sit there would they
tbf i listened to the full interview and that's not fully what he said, the tweet is kind of skewing it. you know i'm not usually one to try to defend anything involving NATO but i don't think it's fair to extrapolate the tweet from the interview itself.
Maybe revealing that Ukraine wouldn't join nato would have actually emboldened the Russians to invade ukraine earlier
They wouldn't just let a fairly pro western Ukrainian government just sit there would they
Then why did they come with the demand of guaranteeing no NATO membership for Ukraine?
The fact of the matter is that the west was posturing about UKRAINIAN SOVEREIGNTY when even by Zelensky's own admission it was a fake sovereignty to uphold publically, while privately letting them know that Ukraine won't join NATO.
tbf i listened to the full interview and that's not fully what he said, the tweet is kind of skewing it. you know i'm not usually one to try to defend anything involving NATO but i don't think it's fair to extrapolate the tweet from the interview itself.
It looks like the tweet is by a crank professor using a dishonest English dub over zelenskys actual words.
Discard this f***ing stupid nonsense
It looks like the tweet is by a crank professor using a dishonest English dub over zelenskys actual words.
Discard this f***ing stupid nonsense
the dub doesn't say what's in the tweet though. zelensky says he didn't disclose the fact that the west didn't want ukraine in NATO earlier because he needed to keep strategic ambiguity to Russia, thinking Russia wouldn't invade if there was a chance of ukraine joining NATO - he says since they were already at war 8 years earlier (i.e. crimea), he needed to keep up a facade of ambiguity in order to deter further action. even if it's true, the fact that the west never wanted Ukraine to join NATO completely damages the idea that the war was engineered to get ukraine to join NATO
the dub doesn't say what's in the tweet though. zelensky says he didn't disclose the fact that the west didn't want ukraine in NATO earlier because he needed to keep strategic ambiguity to Russia, thinking Russia wouldn't invade if there was a chance of ukraine joining NATO - he says since they were already at war 8 years earlier (i.e. crimea), he needed to keep up a facade of ambiguity in order to deter further action. even if it's true, the fact that the west never wanted Ukraine to join NATO completely damages the idea that the war was engineered to get ukraine to join NATO
Facts sorry I misunderstood you
I completely agree, the ambiguity was there so as to create a tangible threat should russia invade
Facts sorry I misunderstood you
I completely agree, the ambiguity was there so as to create a tangible threat should russia invade
i don't really blame him for doing that if that's the case especially knowing the western flank of the country was inevitably f***ed no matter what, he was just bluffing which is almost the opposite of provcation. if anything it shows the opposite of the tweet which is basically NATO never had interest in ukraine because they were such a volatile country vs the baltics where there was never a real hope of war. in that manner it really makes NATO out as being super weak, because they purposefully didn't want to get involved in anything volatile because they knew they'd have their bluff called if they pre-aligned with ukraine
that said i don't think it changes or excuses the fact that now that the conflict did actually materialize NATO powers (really just the US) are taking advantage of it
however it does show the US & EU were very careful that they never wanted direct provocation of Russia, they wanted to dance around it, thinking it'd be a win-win (as far as their interests go), if Russia never invaded then they don't have to do anything, vs if they do they don't have to worry about direct war