Reply
  • Jun 9, 2025
    Banana Clip

    Insane operation

    The name hard too Operation Spider Web

  • Jun 9, 2025
    ·
    1 reply

    I coincidentally attended a speech by Ukraine's ambassador to the U.S. the day after the operation and witnessed the euphoria everyone had about this close up. But in the week since you can kinda tell little came from the operation, and that the damage was likely overstated. That's the issue with Ukraine post-2022. It has tactics and grand schemes, but no strategy for the actual ground war. Only distractions

    "Ukraine’s Drone Attack Doesn’t Matter": foreignpolicy.com/2025/06/09/ukraine-drone-attack-spiders-web-doesnt-matter/?tpcc=recirc_latest062921

    However, the understandable satisfaction that many observers felt upon learning of Spiderweb also reflects some of the errors that have undermined efforts to develop an effective response to the Russian invasion. Brilliant tactical innovations cannot make up for asymmetries in forces or resolve and the absence of an effective overall strategy. Three years into the war, Kyiv and its backers still lack a convincing plan to thwart Russian President Vladimir Putin’s war aims and convince him to end the fighting. Putin’s resolve does not appear to have been shaken by this latest incident, and he was true to his word when he told U.S. President Donald Trump that his country was determined to retaliate.

    --

    Seen in this light, the recent Ukrainian drone operation—as impressive as it was from a purely tactical standpoint—was essentially a sideshow. In this sense, it is not unlike Ukraine’s equally unexpected and initially successful incursion near Kursk, which also failed to alter the course of the war and has since been completely reversed. Destroying a dozen or more strategic bombers won’t really affect Russia’s ability to continue advancing in Ukraine or to launch additional missile and drone attacks against Ukrainian cities.

  • Jun 9, 2025
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    YANDHI

    I coincidentally attended a speech by Ukraine's ambassador to the U.S. the day after the operation and witnessed the euphoria everyone had about this close up. But in the week since you can kinda tell little came from the operation, and that the damage was likely overstated. That's the issue with Ukraine post-2022. It has tactics and grand schemes, but no strategy for the actual ground war. Only distractions

    "Ukraine’s Drone Attack Doesn’t Matter": https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/06/09/ukraine-drone-attack-spiders-web-doesnt-matter/?tpcc=recirc_latest062921

    However, the understandable satisfaction that many observers felt upon learning of Spiderweb also reflects some of the errors that have undermined efforts to develop an effective response to the Russian invasion. Brilliant tactical innovations cannot make up for asymmetries in forces or resolve and the absence of an effective overall strategy. Three years into the war, Kyiv and its backers still lack a convincing plan to thwart Russian President Vladimir Putin’s war aims and convince him to end the fighting. Putin’s resolve does not appear to have been shaken by this latest incident, and he was true to his word when he told U.S. President Donald Trump that his country was determined to retaliate.

    --

    Seen in this light, the recent Ukrainian drone operation—as impressive as it was from a purely tactical standpoint—was essentially a sideshow. In this sense, it is not unlike Ukraine’s equally unexpected and initially successful incursion near Kursk, which also failed to alter the course of the war and has since been completely reversed. Destroying a dozen or more strategic bombers won’t really affect Russia’s ability to continue advancing in Ukraine or to launch additional missile and drone attacks against Ukrainian cities.

    its clear to anyone who thinks about it for even a second: whats the point of deep adventurist operations when you lose ground daily in whats supposedly a defensive war. its all flash for more foreign support to make sure some kind of backing keeps coming in

  • Jun 10, 2025
    WRU

    its clear to anyone who thinks about it for even a second: whats the point of deep adventurist operations when you lose ground daily in whats supposedly a defensive war. its all flash for more foreign support to make sure some kind of backing keeps coming in

    I generally agree but I'd even critique this game plan cus its not 2022-2024 anymore. I don't think these schemes sway Trump in the way it absolutely would Biden's team. Europe was already going to pay.

    Trump seems like he's using this as cover to either allow Russian retaliation or distance himself from the war. Like he didn't even mention it until after he spoke with Putin and then announced on behalf of Russia that they will retaliate. This bought him a few days off the hook to pressure Russia

    Kyiv did damage, but isn't anywhere closer to gaining territory, preventing Russian missile and drone attacks, or getting new U.S. funding. Things can def change tho

  • Stankie 🪑
    Jun 10, 2025

    Free Snowboy

  • Jun 10, 2025

    Man wrap this s*** up already

  • Banana Clip 🍌
    Jun 10, 2025
    ·
    1 reply

    “Supposedly a defensive war” nice dog whistle Russian fed.

    “Brilliant tactical innovations” is literally the entire game plan when fighting asymmetric warfare against a far larger and stronger state. If Afghanistan and Iraq had bordered the US they would’ve made so many attacks inland.

    Ukraine doesn’t (and can’t) win conventionally everywhere, it just needs to impose costs on Russia disproportionate to the effort involved. Furthermore, disrupting the Russian war machine at its source (airfields, fuel depots, other sabotage efforts) directly reduces pressure on the front because it forces Russia to divert resources, spread out defenses, and rethink logistics. It also psychologically forces Russia to acknowledge their own territory is not safe, consequences to their aggression.

    International support is critical but Ukraine doesn’t carry out these operations just for optics. The core objective is battlefield advantage, to make it harder for Russia to continue its invasion, stretch their capabilities thin, and create strategic dilemmas for Russian commanders.

  • Jun 10, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    WRU

    @sab pull the plug big bro. op is dead, no significant updates or news on the whole thing, no meaningful discussion for the last however many pages. might as well create a new peace talk thread later when those actually happen

    for libtards sanity do it

  • Jun 10, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    WRU

    for libtards sanity do it

    Request a perma too tired of your crying itt

  • Jun 10, 2025
    Vert1600

    Request a perma too tired of your crying itt

    thats your nicotine withdrawals got nothing to do with me

  • Jun 10, 2025
    ·
    2 replies
    Banana Clip

    “Supposedly a defensive war” nice dog whistle Russian fed.

    “Brilliant tactical innovations” is literally the entire game plan when fighting asymmetric warfare against a far larger and stronger state. If Afghanistan and Iraq had bordered the US they would’ve made so many attacks inland.

    Ukraine doesn’t (and can’t) win conventionally everywhere, it just needs to impose costs on Russia disproportionate to the effort involved. Furthermore, disrupting the Russian war machine at its source (airfields, fuel depots, other sabotage efforts) directly reduces pressure on the front because it forces Russia to divert resources, spread out defenses, and rethink logistics. It also psychologically forces Russia to acknowledge their own territory is not safe, consequences to their aggression.

    International support is critical but Ukraine doesn’t carry out these operations just for optics. The core objective is battlefield advantage, to make it harder for Russia to continue its invasion, stretch their capabilities thin, and create strategic dilemmas for Russian commanders.

    I agree on the notion that a smaller power has to impose costs that make the effort unsustainable, but i think where I (and the professor I quoted) disagree is that these operations actually do that.

    Ukraine's successes have usually come from launching attacks that trigger retreats from Ukrainian territory. Kherson is a good example. Those are the hard hitting moves that are needed and I don't think attacking fuel depots every now and then, drones to strategic bombers or even taurus strikes equal that at all. They do it because its all they have left. Same with Kursk. That only ended up stretching Ukraine thinner and then it got entirely reversed with thousands of more men lost

    If all we get this summer is Ukraine doing sabotage missions as Russia's offensive picks up territory every week then what are we left with? You're supposed to be using tactical attacks to add to the pain, not as your only weapon.

    The operation allowed drones to partially level the playing field as air support, but it doesn't actually alter Russian thinking nor can serve as a strategy. The fact U.S. basically helped clear the path for Russia's retaliation itself tells you enough.

  • Jun 10, 2025
    YANDHI

    I agree on the notion that a smaller power has to impose costs that make the effort unsustainable, but i think where I (and the professor I quoted) disagree is that these operations actually do that.

    Ukraine's successes have usually come from launching attacks that trigger retreats from Ukrainian territory. Kherson is a good example. Those are the hard hitting moves that are needed and I don't think attacking fuel depots every now and then, drones to strategic bombers or even taurus strikes equal that at all. They do it because its all they have left. Same with Kursk. That only ended up stretching Ukraine thinner and then it got entirely reversed with thousands of more men lost

    If all we get this summer is Ukraine doing sabotage missions as Russia's offensive picks up territory every week then what are we left with? You're supposed to be using tactical attacks to add to the pain, not as your only weapon.

    The operation allowed drones to partially level the playing field as air support, but it doesn't actually alter Russian thinking nor can serve as a strategy. The fact U.S. basically helped clear the path for Russia's retaliation itself tells you enough.

    You’re talking to a literal spook bro don’t bother

  • Banana Clip 🍌
    Jun 10, 2025
    YANDHI

    I agree on the notion that a smaller power has to impose costs that make the effort unsustainable, but i think where I (and the professor I quoted) disagree is that these operations actually do that.

    Ukraine's successes have usually come from launching attacks that trigger retreats from Ukrainian territory. Kherson is a good example. Those are the hard hitting moves that are needed and I don't think attacking fuel depots every now and then, drones to strategic bombers or even taurus strikes equal that at all. They do it because its all they have left. Same with Kursk. That only ended up stretching Ukraine thinner and then it got entirely reversed with thousands of more men lost

    If all we get this summer is Ukraine doing sabotage missions as Russia's offensive picks up territory every week then what are we left with? You're supposed to be using tactical attacks to add to the pain, not as your only weapon.

    The operation allowed drones to partially level the playing field as air support, but it doesn't actually alter Russian thinking nor can serve as a strategy. The fact U.S. basically helped clear the path for Russia's retaliation itself tells you enough.

    Kherson was a major conventional success that came at the cost of heavy casualties Ukraine simply can’t afford to sustain the way Russia can. The tactical operations/sabotages disrupt the war effort in ways we probably can’t even know about, slowing Russia’s advance until a bigger counteroffensive opportunity arises. I agree sabotage missions alone won’t win the war but this is simply not the scale of a war Ukraine can win with boots on the ground without heavy foreign aid.

    ^I’m a literal spook that works in consumer protection yeah man does putin pay for the glazing or do you offer that free of charge

  • Jun 11, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
  • Jun 11, 2025
    ·
    1 reply

    @YANDHI can u recreate the thread and keep it updated? thatd be super sweet

  • Jun 11, 2025
    ·
    2 replies

    Ukraine should become direct allies with isreal so russia can bomb the s*** out of them

  • Jun 12, 2025
    ·
    2 replies
    PFLP optimisticman

    Ukraine should become direct allies with isreal so russia can bomb the s*** out of them

    Weirdo

  • Jun 12, 2025
    OnceAgain

    Weirdo

  • Jun 12, 2025
    YANDHI
    https://twitter.com/KyivIndependent/status/1932524668172284204

    they have said this like 10 times since trump took office

  • Jun 12, 2025
    ·
    3 replies
    OnceAgain

    Weirdo

    no I want as many countries as possible to bomb israel. russia ofc won't go to war with israel for a lot of reasons but I don't discourage such things.

  • snowboyrari

    no I want as many countries as possible to bomb israel. russia ofc won't go to war with israel for a lot of reasons but I don't discourage such things.

    Back like we never left

  • Stankie 🪑
    Jun 12, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    snowboyrari

    no I want as many countries as possible to bomb israel. russia ofc won't go to war with israel for a lot of reasons but I don't discourage such things.

    Acorn free

  • Jun 12, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    WRU

    @YANDHI can u recreate the thread and keep it updated? thatd be super sweet

    Bro tryna delete a classic thread.. smh.

  • Jun 12, 2025
    JaeRell

    Bro tryna delete a classic thread.. smh.

    it wont be deleted im pretty sure