Like WHO
Russian invasion bad
Arming Nazis bad, even if they're fighting against a Russian invasion
This isn't rocket science why are yall struggling with this
John Pilger spittin his usual heat back in 2014:
The name of "our" enemy has changed over the years, from communism to Islamism, but generally it is any society independent of western power and occupying strategically useful or resource-rich territory. The leaders of these obstructive nations are usually violently shoved aside, such as the democrats Muhammad Mossedeq in Iran and Salvador Allende in Chile, or they are murdered like Patrice Lumumba in the Congo. All are subjected to a western media campaign of caricature and vilification - think Fidel Castro, Hugo Chávez, now Vladimir Putin.
Washington's role in Ukraine is different only in its implications for the rest of us. For the first time since the Reagan years, the US is threatening to take the world to war. With eastern Europe and the Balkans now military outposts of Nato, the last "buffer state" bordering Russia is being torn apart. We in the west are backing neo-Nazis in a country where Ukrainian Nazis backed Hitler. Having masterminded the coup in February against the democratically elected government in Kiev, Washington's planned seizure of Russia's historic, legitimate warm-water naval base in Crimea failed. The Russians defended themselves, as they have done against every threat and invasion from the west for almost a century.
But Nato's military encirclement has accelerated, along with US-orchestrated attacks on ethnic Russians in Ukraine. If Putin can be provoked into coming to their aid, his pre-ordained "pariah" role will justify a Nato-run guerrilla war that is likely to spill into Russia itself.
Instead, Putin has confounded the war party by seeking an accommodation with Washington and the EU, by withdrawing troops from the Ukrainian border and urging ethnic Russians in eastern Ukraine to abandon the weekend's provocative referendum. These Russian-speaking and bilingual people - a third of Ukraine's population - have long sought a democratic federation that reflects the country's ethnic diversity and is both autonomous and independent of Moscow. Most are neither "separatists" nor "rebels" but citizens who want to live securely in their homeland.
Like the ruins of Iraq and Afghanistan, Ukraine has been turned into a CIA theme park - run by CIA director John Brennan in Kiev, with "special units" from the CIA and FBI setting up a "security structure" that oversees savage attacks on those who opposed the February coup. Watch the videos, read the eye-witness reports from the massacre in Odessa this month. Bussed fascist thugs burned the trade union headquarters, killing 41 people trapped inside. Watch the police standing by. A doctor described trying to rescue people, "but I was stopped by pro-Ukrainian Nazi radicals. One of them pushed me away rudely, promising that soon me and other Jews of Odessa are going to meet the same fate... I wonder, why the whole world is keeping silent."
Russian-speaking Ukrainians are fighting for survival. When Putin announced the withdrawal of Russian troops from the border, the Kiev junta's defence secretary - a founding member of the fascist Svoboda party - boasted that the attacks on "insurgents" would continue. In Orwellian style, propaganda in the west has inverted this to Moscow "trying to orchestrate conflict and provocation", according to William Hague. His cynicism is matched by Obama's grotesque congratulations to the coup junta on its "remarkable restraint" following the Odessa massacre. Illegal and fascist-dominated, the junta is described by Obama as "duly elected". What matters is not truth, Henry Kissinger once said, but "but what is perceived to be true."
In the US media the Odessa atrocity has been played down as "murky" and a "tragedy" in which "nationalists" (neo-Nazis) attacked "separatists" (people collecting signatures for a referendum on a federal Ukraine). Rupert Murdoch's Wall Street Journal damned the victims - "Deadly Ukraine Fire Likely Sparked by Rebels, Government Says". Propaganda in Germany has been pure cold war, with the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung warning its readers of Russia's "undeclared war". For Germans, it is an invidious irony that Putin is the only leader to condemn the rise of fascism in 21st-century Europe.
A popular truism is that "the world changed" following 9/11. But what has changed? According to the great whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg, a silent coup has taken place in Washington and rampant militarism now rules. The Pentagon currently runs "special operations" - secret wars - in 124 countries. At home, rising poverty and hemorrhaging liberty are the historic corollary of a perpetual war state. Add the risk of nuclear war, and the question begs: why do we tolerate this?
Gas prices go up
Outside of that... if my moral and political stance is that America shouldn't take care, protect, or fund any military aspect of random ass countries...
Why defend funding Ukraine?
Ok but those Nazis aren't gonna invade Russia or Belarus, so what are they gonna do with those weapons
Yes being a Nazi is bad but what action have they made for Russia to deem it as a excuse for an attack
STOP BEING A NAZI APOLOGIST ITT JUST BECAUSE THEYRE OPPOSING ANOTHER BAD FORCE
germany put up the colors and said that’s enough allyship for today i think
Also, I have an american take.
Why care about this in the first place if you don't support US military being the police of the world?
How does this affect the average american today?
1. War is bad for business.
2. If the world folds for Russia in Ukraine, that means the world could fold for when they contest Canada for their waters in a not so distant future. And then if the world folds then, who knows when they won't fold.
And that's wrong lol
But how are they more severe.
Are they more violent than the other nazi
Are they more likely to take over ukraine
Nazis are nazis. It does matter that the others do a better job of hiding it.
Maybe because they're being e
legitimized by their government and given an official military unit?
Tf do you mean how is it more severe? It'd be like the US making Atomwaffen an official military unit. You wouldn't see how that's an issue?
I hope Sladki Slivki is okay
She’s a Russian / Ukrainian treasure
If she can’t broker peace between Russia and Ukraine with her incredible mind blowing oral skills …
Get her to Atlanta immediately I’ll take care of her
And that's wrong lol
But how are they more severe.
Are they more violent than the other nazi
Are they more likely to take over ukraine
Nazis are nazis. It does matter that the others do a better job of hiding it.

Outside of that... if my moral and political stance is that America shouldn't take care, protect, or fund any military aspect of random ass countries...
Why defend funding Ukraine?
Somebody else should answer that bc I have no clue
I don't support the US Military being the police of the world but just because something might not directly affect you (it affected my stocks), it doesn't mean you should turn a blind eye to it
Human history is very important and events happening around the world need to be documented
Oh that I'm aware of. I mean the stance some people are taking that America is right to fund and give weapons to Ukraine to protect from Russia.
Does Russia fw China?
Like are they cool with each other or have mutual respect?
Outside of that... if my moral and political stance is that America shouldn't take care, protect, or fund any military aspect of random ass countries...
Why defend funding Ukraine?
Not defending your allies (if its spills into NATO territory) will leave you with no allies
I hope Sladki Slivki is okay
She’s a Russian / Ukrainian treasure
If she can’t broker peace between Russia and Ukraine with her incredible mind blowing oral skills …
Get her to Atlanta immediately I’ll take care of her

so they b****made huh
IM SAYING IT AGAIN. UKRANIAN NAZIS ARE NOT A JUSTIFICATION FOR RUSSIA TO INVADE. IVE SAID THIS FIVE TIMES ITT
EVEN IF THEYRE PRO NATO AND HEAVILY ANTI RUSSIA TO THE POINT THAY THEY WERE PRO INVASION OF RUSSIA, THATS NOT A VALID JUSTIFICATION
I know I'm not alluding to that I'm asking a question
The hypocrisy is too obvious.
classic
Does Russia fw China?
Like are they cool with each other or have mutual respect?
they next to each other
Republicans are going full mask off anti-American pro-Russia with this s***
Putin’s work here has reached a boiling point
Why are we assuming Putin would just keep invading if he saw military action by NATO? Genuine question
putin has not even come close to deploying the full force he has on the border.
the invasion is wildly successful as we speak. the ukrainian air force is crippled, their air defense is mitigated, their navy is gone. they aren't going to stop this just because we're sending weapons