they have already gave ukraine weapons and support a couple weeks back iirc
yeah i know just stating my opinion
but these Nazis aren’t the main driving force in the Ukrainian military. they could be down the road but not rn I guess
The Islamist militias weren’t the driving military force in Afghanistan in the beginning either
I agree that it doesn't justify Russia's invasion, that's just agitative propaganda. The actual reason is NATO (also not justifiable).
I disagree that we should be arming those Nazi militias tho, it would be the same story as Islamist fundamentalists in Afghanistan being armed to fight against the Russian invasion. Didn't end well
Lol just admit you love Putin instead of beating around the bush.
is the nazi number in ukraine comparable to the Islamist fundamentalists in Afghanistan?
cus the way I see it rn, I rather risk giving 1 million (Ik it’s less than this) nazis weapons to protect 43 million relatively innocent citizens (Ik my numbers are exaggerated but my point is that I rather save the overwhelming majority of innocent to risk giving evil people weapons)
the question here is what will happen after the war and we leave the country destroyed with a bunch of militarized nazi militias seizing power
the country's proximity to western europe probably means we'll do a better job stabilizing the region than we did in the middle east but it's not a good idea to underestimate our stupidity in international affairs
The Islamist militias weren’t the driving military force in Afghanistan in the beginning either
yea ofc like the Nazis could be the main driving force down the road but something has to be done rn. if not sending weapons, then sending troops?
the question here is what will happen after the war and we leave the country destroyed with a bunch of militarized nazi militias seizing power
the country's proximity to western europe probably means we'll do a better job stabilizing the region than we did in the middle east but it's not a good idea to underestimate our stupidity in international affairs
hmmmm that’s a good point
this is the line of thinking i’ve been seein a lot itt but it doesn’t make sense to me. russia invades, which is wrong, but it’s also wrong to help the country that’s now defending itself
if it’s wrong to help ukraine, then is it right to let russia jus go on? or is that wrong still? if that’s wrong, then what’s the point of the sentiment?
There is no situation where I think we should arm Nazis that are active in spreading Nazism and militarily training Nazis across Europe and North America, sorry. If you're gonna arm them, do it on the condition that the govt cuts ties with Nazi militias.
It's wild to me that opposition to arming Nazis is a controversial opinion
so what can we do to support ukraine without arming them?
@Y0rn
I'm on the right side of history in this case
Bet i never give anyone a hand ever tho
America: funds freedom fighters in Afghanistan in the 1980’s to combat a geopolitical enemy
Islamist Freedom fighters after 1988: okay we’re gonna become Al Qaeda and do 9/11
America: funds freedom fighters in Iraq in 2006:
Islamist Freedom fighters after 2006: okay were gonna do an ISIS
America: funds freedom fighters in Ukraine in 2022
Nazi freedom fighters after 2022: No were all about freedom folks we definitely won’t use these anti tank missiles the same way as the last guys
so what can we do to support ukraine without arming them?
mean words at the UN
so what can we do to support ukraine without arming them?
probably provide food/medicine and facilitate evacuations? not really informed on what aid is going there RN but thats my guess
yea ofc like the Nazis could be the main driving force down the road but something has to be done rn. if not sending weapons, then sending troops?
That would start a nuclear war. If you're gonna arm them, do it on the condition that they cut ties with Nazis. If they aren't willing to do that, then maybe the govt is more sympathetic to Nazism than I even thought at first
That would start a nuclear war. If you're gonna arm them, do it on the condition that they cut ties with Nazis. If they aren't willing to do that, then maybe the govt is more sympathetic to Nazism than I even thought at first
yea I guess that would work too
turned on the tv and they're doing the same s*** they do every time theres a terrorist attack
"putin hates our democratic values and our way of life"
turned on the tv and they're doing the same s*** they do every time theres a terrorist attack
"putin hates our democratic values and our way of life"
Lmfaoooo
Lmfaoooo
he's just jealous bro
what do you think about this post
lets wait a few months and see what they do in mali
There is no situation where I think we should arm Nazis that are active in spreading Nazism and militarily training Nazis across Europe and North America, sorry. If you're gonna arm them, do it on the condition that the govt cuts ties with Nazi militias.
It's wild to me that opposition to arming Nazis is a controversial opinion
it’s not a controversial opinion what i’m wondering is how does that opinion square with the opinion that russia invading is wrong
cus i don’t get what the mental conclusion is if you simultaneously think that it’s wrong for ukraine to be invaded but also that it’s wrong for them to receive help defending themselves