Fair but lesser of evils is still evil

What about neither

Oh I see we got the whole circus here

We dont live in a world where neither is an option

I hope you have 3 bowel movements today you are clearly full of s***. Have a kombucha and fiber today

Here you go, brainlet.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advisory_opinion_on_Kosovo%27s_declaration_of_independence

We could if Europe stopped playing lap dog to America

clearly you arent able to understand the importance of different circumstances

Have you read anything I said the past pages?

I only posted that to see who would respond

Some reading material

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosovo_independence_precedent

is Australia the safest place if nuclear war broke out?

Oh ok

Go read it then

I have to go to work, y'all go play your geopolitical simulators

literally the first paragraph

There were many reactions to the decision, with most countries which already recognised Kosovo hailing the decision and saying it was "unique" and does not set a precedent; while many countries which do not recognise Kosovo said they would not be doing so as such recognition could set a precedent of endorsing secession in other places.

Take care

yall talking too much y’all just got to squabble up that’s all I got from that

STREET FIGHTER VI COMING SOON IM RUNNING FADES

You going too far

Now you can figure out that there are 3 different opinions, and that law isn't a natural science.

The west does not want to invade russia. Simple as. There's no desire there to take over russia.

Never said that.

The west would have no reason to stand by Ukraine if they chose to invade Crimea. Even if Ukraine was in NATO. The article 5 s*** applies to when a country gets attacked not when they launch an offensive.

And what is Russia gonna do if they invade the Crimea? They're gonna retaliate, and that does invoke article 5. So in the worst case it is a case of a de facto NATO invasion of the Crimea, best case it's the threat of NATO to cripple Russia into not fighting back, Russia would never accept either.

And this is assuming Ukraine would even pull some s*** like that in the first place. Sure, Putin says they would do that but also DUDE HE'S F***ING PUTIN THE GUY LIES ALL THE F***ING TIME.

Putin didn't say that. Ukraine did, they adopted a "Strategy for the Liberation and Reintegration of Crimea" action plan. "Liberating Crimea" is an expressed goal of theirs:

aa.com.tr/en/politics/ukraines-cabinet-approves-action-plan-for-liberation-of-crimea/2378552

ok dude the Soviet union does not exist. Russia still does tho. a lot of former soviet republics have long been terrified of getting swallowed up by Russia again cus that seems to happen to us a lot. We don't care what so and so said to Gorbachov like a million years ago, we want solid protection from a Russian invasion. NATO expansion wasn't some manipulative tactic pushed by the West and forced onto these countries. NATO membership is something countries apply for and choose on their own bruh. And yes, a lot of eastern euros rlly do want that nato protection fr, its not them getting scammed into joining

To put in a way that pro-US mfs will understand, that's "whataboutism". Ukraine didn't want to join NATO until the conflict with Russia started, which started with a US-backed coup:

they could potentially have fast tracking due to the circumstances but yeah these things dont generally happen overnight

more liekly to join nato than the EU

u the one who borught up law