u should fully understand the rest of this thread then and read my follow up messages the rest of us are just talking
had to resist the urge to tell him to full understand some b****es
Use a , then
Sag es dann auf deutsch? Glaubst du ich glaube auf deine scheiße das du Jura studierst?
No comma needed for said sentence.
And it is "dass", not "das". We need to get you German classes too.
had to resist the urge to tell him to full understand some b****es
I would have laughed
No comma needed for said sentence.
And it is "dass", not "das". We need to get you German classes too.
man
No comma needed for said sentence.
And it is "dass", not "das". We need to get you German classes too.
Ja und deutsch ist nicht meine Muttersprache, Englisch auch nicht
Du willst nur über grammatik reden wenn alles was du gesagt hast falsch ist
Ja und deutsch ist nicht meine Muttersprache, Englisch auch nicht
Du willst nur über grammatik reden wenn alles was du gesagt hast falsch ist
Nothing I said is wrong. The Kosovo opinion sets a precedent for Crimea and now Donbass in the opinion of many legal scholars.
You trying to talk about war crimes against Bosniaks and Kosovars doesn't change that
How that peace talk is going
The US when Ukraine won't put a written agreement on NATO membership on the table and the war continues:

Wtf is this guys problem? He’s barely audible at arm-length let alone oversized Russian table length

Nothing I said is wrong. The Kosovo opinion sets a precedent for Crimea and now Donbass in the opinion of many legal scholars.
You trying to talk about war crimes against Bosniaks and Kosovars doesn't change that
yeah and in the opinion of other legal scholars it doesnt because theyre different circumstances
legal scholars isnt one dude and you dont speak for all of them
yeah and in the opinion of other legal scholars it doesnt because theyre different circumstances
legal scholars isnt one dude and you dont speak for all of them
Thank you for figuring out how legal opinions work.
Nothing I said is wrong. The Kosovo opinion sets a precedent for Crimea and now Donbass in the opinion of many legal scholars.
You trying to talk about war crimes against Bosniaks and Kosovars doesn't change that
Ok kid but people have read what you actually said itt
You can edit your posts as long as you want, don't talk about Yugoslavia anymore
The US when Ukraine won't put a written agreement on NATO membership on the table and the war continues:
!https://youtu.be/3JiUJm3sAv8
Ok kid but people have read what you actually said itt
You can edit your posts as long as you want, don't talk about Yugoslavia anymore
I didn't edit anything; you are too emotional to read correctly.
Thank you for figuring out how legal opinions work.
ok?
ur clearly ignoring what i actually mean by that and just taking the words as facto but cool
Imagine not having kev blocked tho frfr
There's been a lot of annoying NATO shilling itt but he the only one i blocked that says a lot
I didn't edit anything; you are too emotional to read correctly.
And you are too stupid to understand the circumstances
I would rather be in my position
ok?
ur clearly ignoring what i actually mean by that and just taking the words as facto but cool
That's why it is called an opinion. Yes. Because it is not a fact of nature.