You're an uncle tom who thinks elections actually mean anything when it comes to oppression so you line up under liberals like a cuck not realizing they are the ones pushing the big baddy fascists as threats to rally people around them while doing the same s*** as them just more subtle once they get into power

F***ing uncle tom lmaooo

"As if Germany didnt have the same problem"

Lol this how I know u a weirdo lol

The AfD is f***ing trivial there meanwhile Le Pen and Zemmour got a combined 35% lol

Islamophobic parties got a cool 75% and the niggas who put the extra sauce on it got a combined 50% lmao 😂

What if I tell you Islamophobia exists outside the AfD

What if I tell you the entire police and military and intelligence is run by Nazis

You know nothing, you are just a kak deep down inside

^ dude would have skipped the 2020 vote in the US if he was there bc he a idiot lmao

Don't try this with me man I know pressure and I know what other people deal with Im close with Muslim people too and I want the best for everyone who has to deal with bigotry, Macron is not the way

Your entire worldview spins around the US electoral system? Like a true CANZcuck you can't even talk about your own country Canada? France is not the USA and even in the USA the situation is different depending on whether it is a swing state or not. Stop being Americabrained you fool

Macron already f***ed everyone with that lesser evil mentality in 2017 we shouldn't be falling for this again

Dude is talking about WE MUST SUPPORT MACRON as if it's already the run-off elections lmao

Whats there to talk about in Canada lmao

Any socially populist party is completely ostracized and economically theyre all different shades of liberals lmao

Even the conservatives here have been fuming over the s*** happening to muslims in quebec (which is btw nothing compared to france) and a sikh dude got a legit chance at taking the W next time 😭😭😭

Reason I don’t talk ab Canada is that we’re f***ing GOOD here lol

You're just a liberal inside So stop instrumentalizing Islam for your liberal rallying

Jagmeet Singh doesnt got a chance to win the next election lol, the NDP been getting blasted for the mess that happened in BC with the logging issue by his own base, for trying to play both sides. Its just gonna be another Liberal victory most likely lol.

Fam we’re Im at rn and most likely will be in the rest of my life, there is absolutely zero liberals lmao 😭😭😭

Whats ur thoughts on Canada vs France or the US

Dont really know much about France so I cant say much.

For US and Canada I feel like we just follow the trends of the US to a lesser degree. We're gonna be stuck in the same neoliberal economic policy, even if we elect someone who's more fascistic or liberal in rhetoric, the economic policy stays the same like as in the USA between Trump and Obama, and I dont think voting for the "lesser evil" will do as all that does it delay the inevitable, and even in that extra time bought liberals dont do anything to actually reduce the power of more fascistic side of the country rather wait for the elections again and say vote for us while we try to keep the slowly degrading status quo rather than improve anything, and I dont trust the NDP to be any different with their action in BC recently and with the provincial leadership they in the past, they just continued the trend of neoliberalization rather than the social democracy they promise. Hell we spend less on social spending per gap than America we're even more neoliberal than them outside of the big qualitative social spending we do have in healthcare (2019 not sure after covid)

In direct comparison to America I'd say we're much more liberal like you said all three major parties are basically a different tint of liberal. Then again we just follow the trends of America I dont think it was a coincidence that Trump and Doug Ford who used a lot of trump like rhetoric won during the same time period.

What a failing country

pretty based ngl

sacre bleu

this why I dont f*** with Europe lol.

king s***

The first issue is the Gospel that was revealed from the Lord of the Worlds to the Prophet of Allaah ‘Eesa (peace be upon him). Belief that Allaah revealed a Book to His Prophet ‘Eesa and that the name of this book was the Gospel (Injeel), are basic principles of faith that we must believe in. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“The Messenger (Muhammad) believes in what has been sent down to him from his Lord, and (so do) the believers. Each one believes in Allaah, His Angels, His Books, and His Messengers. (They say,) ‘We make no distinction between one another of His Messengers’ — and they say, ‘We hear, and we obey. (We seek) Your forgiveness, our Lord, and to You is the return (of all)’”

al-Baqarah 2:285

The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said to Jibreel, when he asked him about faith, as mentioned in the well-known hadeeth: “Faith means to believe in Allaah, His angels, His books, His messengers, the Last Day, and to believe in His divine will and decree, both good and bad.” (Agreed upon).

Disbelieving in that or doubting it is misguidance and kufr or disbelief in Allaah. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“O you who believe! Believe in Allaah, and His Messenger (Muhammad), and the Book (the Qur’aan) which He has sent down to His Messenger, and the Scripture which He sent down to those before (him); and whosoever disbelieves in Allaah, His Angels, His Books, His Messengers, and the Last Day, then indeed he has strayed far away.

137. Verily, those who believe, then disbelieve, then believe (again), and (again) disbelieve, and go on increasing in disbelief; Allaah will not forgive them, nor guide them on the (right) way”

al-Nisa’ 4:136-137

“Verily, those who disbelieve in Allaah and His Messengers and wish to make distinction between Allaah and His Messengers (by believing in Allaah and disbelieving in His Messengers) saying, “We believe in some but reject others,” and wish to adopt a way in between.

151. They are in truth disbelievers. And We have prepared for the disbelievers a humiliating torment”

al-Nisa’ 4:150-151

The second issue is the Gospel or, more precisely, the Gospels that the Christians have today. Although one of the basic principles of our faith is to believe in the Gospel that was revealed to ‘Eesa, we also believe that there is no longer any book that remained as it was revealed by Allaah, neither the Gospel nor anything else, apart from the Qur’aan. Even the Christians themselves do not believe that the books that they have before them were revealed in that form from God, nor do they claim that the Messiah wrote the Gospel or at least that it was written during his lifetime. Imam Ibn Hazm (may Allaah have mercy on him) says in al-Fasl fi’l-Milal (2/2):

We do not need to try hard to prove that the Gospels and all the books of the Christians did not come from God or from the Messiah (peace be upon him), as we needed to do with regard to the Torah and the books attributed to the Prophets that the Jews have, because the Jews claim that the Torah that they have was revealed from God to Moosa, so we needed to establish proof that this claim of theirs is false. With regard to the Christians, they have taken care of the issue themselves, because they do not believe that the Gospels were revealed from God to the Messiah, or that the Messiah brought them, rather all of them from first to last, peasants and kings, Nestorians, Jacobites, Maronites and Orthodox are all agreed that there are four historical accounts written by four known men at different times. The first of them is the account written by Matthew the Levite who was a disciple of the Messiah, nine years after the Messiah was taken up into heaven. He wrote it in Hebrew in Judaea in Palestine, and it filled approximately twenty-eight pages in a medium-sized script. The next account was written by Mark, a disciple of Simon ben Yuna, who was called Peter, twenty-two years after the Messiah was taken up into heaven. He wrote it in Greek in Antioch in the land of the Byzantines. They say that the Simon mentioned is the one who wrote it, then he erased his name from the beginning of it and attributed it to his disciple Mark. It filled twenty-four pages written in a medium-sized script. This Simon was a disciple of the Messiah. The third account written was that of Luke, a physician of Antioch who was also a disciple of Simon Peter. He wrote it in Greek after Mark had written his account, and is similar in length to the Gospel of Matthew. The fourth account was written by John the son of Zebedee, another disciple of the Messiah, sixty-odd years after the Messiah has been taken up into heaven. He wrote it in Greek, and it filled twenty-four pages in a medium-sized script. End quote.

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said in al-Jawaab al-Saheeh (3:21):

With regard to the Gospels that the Christians have, there are four Gospels, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. They are agreed that Luke and Mark did not see the Messiah, rather he was seen by Matthew and John. These four accounts which they call the Gospel, and they call each one of them a Gospel, were written by these men after the Messiah had been taken up into heaven. They did not say that they are the word of God or that the Messiah conveyed them from God, rather they narrated some of the words of the Messiah and some of his deeds and miracles. End quote.

Moreover, these books which were written after the time of the Messiah did not remain in their original form. The original versions were lost long ago. Ibn Hazm said:

With regard to the Christians, there is no dispute among them or anyone else that only one hundred and twenty men believed in the Messiah during his lifetime… and all of those who believed in him concealed themselves and were afraid during his lifetime and afterwards; they called people to his religion in secret and none of them disclosed himself or practised his religion openly, because any of them who was caught was executed.

They continued in this manner, not showing themselves at all, and they had no place where they were safe for three hundred years after the Messiah was taken up into heaven.

During this time, the Gospel that had been revealed from Allaah disappeared, apart from a few verses which Allaah preserved as proof against them and as a rebuke to them, as we have mentioned. Then when the Emperor Constantine became a Christian, then the Christians prevailed and started to practise their religion openly and assemble in safety.

If a religion is like this, with its followers practicing it in secret and living in constant fear of the sword, it is impossible for things to be transmitted soundly via a continuous chain of narrators and its followers cannot protect it or prevent it from being distorted.

End quote. Al-Fasl, 2/4-5.

In addition to this huge disruption in the chain of transmission of their books, which lasted for two centuries, these books did not remain in the languages in which they were originally written, rather they were translated, more than once, by people whose level of knowledge and honesty is unknown. The contradictions in these books and their shortcomings are among the strongest evidence that they have been distorted and that they are not the Gospel (Injeel) that Allaah revealed to His slave and Messenger ‘Eesa (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). Allaah indeed spoke the truth when He said (interpretation of the meaning):

“Had it been from other than Allaah, they would surely, have found therein many a contradiction”

al-Nisa’ 4:82.

Why do you think the Quran is still in it's preserved state even after ~1500 years?

Anywhere terrorism thrives people will get afraid and vote for extremes. It ain't that difficult. France had to do with it the most in Europe so a big chunk of those people vote for them. And there are already the racists, which is a relatively large percentage in (old) colonizing countries, who vote for those extremists. France was after England prob the worst of em too, so then you get these percentages.

Germany is a completely different case history wise

The use of 'liberal' on ktt is really weird. My association w liberal and liberalism seems completely different. You from the USA?

Liberal as in stemming from enlightenment era politics, bourgeois revolutions, "human rights", free markets et cetera

Focus on individual over collective

Idealism instead of materialism in terms of philosophy