Reply
  • Jun 8, 2024

    you the type of nigga we tell to go make some drums.

  • Jun 8, 2024
    ·
    1 reply
    DiamondsFlooded

    steve stoute was cooking when he brought this up years ago

    What he say

  • Jun 8, 2024
    ·
    1 reply
    Gangy
    https://twitter.com/mediittoo/status/1799109849286156527https://twitter.com/short4robert/status/1798761799678152997

    he is not bigger then the 80s that inspired a whole different sound of music styles besides rock music era

  • Jun 8, 2024

    Brother, I am brian.

  • Jun 8, 2024
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply

    To say Drake is bigger than these artists combined is ridiculous:

    Madonna, Michael Jackson, Led Zepplin, Prince, Pink Floyd , Elton John, Beatles, Rolling Stones is ridiculous. That’s just naming a few.

    Those artists sold physicals in vinyl, tapes
    and cds globally. Fans are paying $10 per month for all Music on a streaming site, the sales ain’t the same as previous eras.

  • Jun 8, 2024
    xxxkiraxxx

    need some data on this cause this is a heavy claim tbf

    Trust me bro

  • Jun 8, 2024
    ·
    1 reply
    Trishtiza26

    he is not bigger then the 80s that inspired a whole different sound of music styles besides rock music era

    Yo…he was talking about numbers 🤦🏾‍♂️

  • Jun 8, 2024
    ·
    2 replies

    Comprehension skills at an all time low…

  • Jun 8, 2024
    ·
    2 replies
    Uouj

    To say Drake is bigger than these artists combined is ridiculous:

    Madonna, Michael Jackson, Led Zepplin, Prince, Pink Floyd , Elton John, Beatles, Rolling Stones is ridiculous. That’s just naming a few.

    Those artists sold physicals in vinyl, tapes
    and cds globally. Fans are paying $10 per month for all Music on a streaming site, the sales ain’t the same as previous eras.

    I don’t really care about this conversation but I hate this argument.

    There was no internet. You were forced to listen to what the radio waves played. You don’t think that worked in the older artist's favor?

    Labels bought albums to boost their artists.

    Music game is music game. So that argument doesn’t work. Anything can be fudged or manipulated it’s not specific to a time period…this is a business at the end of the day.

  • crsuwo

    Comprehension skills at an all time low…

  • crsuwo

    Comprehension skills at an all time low…

    It’s quite comical reading some of the conclusions people come to 😂

  • Jun 8, 2024
    ·
    edited
    ·
    2 replies
    Silence4Hours

    I don’t really care about this conversation but I hate this argument.

    There was no internet. You were forced to listen to what the radio waves played. You don’t think that worked in the older artist's favor?

    Labels bought albums to boost their artists.

    Music game is music game. So that argument doesn’t work. Anything can be fudged or manipulated it’s not specific to a time period…this is a business at the end of the day.

    The same way a bigger artist like Drake is spammed on every major playlist,
    YouTube algorithm, TikTok, and IG algorithm. And we all know radio has loved Drake for the past decade.

    There is way more fan programming in this era than any other era.

    Even though they did have radio programming, fans still had to physically go to a store to buy music, that’s way more than paying $10 a month for all music and listening through your phone.

  • Jun 8, 2024
    ·
    2 replies
    Uouj
    · edited

    The same way a bigger artist like Drake is spammed on every major playlist,
    YouTube algorithm, TikTok, and IG algorithm. And we all know radio has loved Drake for the past decade.

    There is way more fan programming in this era than any other era.

    Even though they did have radio programming, fans still had to physically go to a store to buy music, that’s way more than paying $10 a month for all music and listening through your phone.

    Meh, Drake was big before all that existed but I get your point. Pretty much proves my point that there’s no difference between the two eras though.

    I would even argue media back then had a bigger impact and control. Like you literally didn’t have a choice. There is no internet to stream your favorite artist. You literally had to listen to them older artists. No related tab, no searching for new artists from the convenience of your phone.

    If radio said Smokey Robinson is hot, then that’s what you’re going to have to listen to.

  • this just factually incorrect

  • Jun 8, 2024
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    Silence4Hours

    Meh, Drake was big before all that existed but I get your point. Pretty much proves my point that there’s no difference between the two eras though.

    I would even argue media back then had a bigger impact and control. Like you literally didn’t have a choice. There is no internet to stream your favorite artist. You literally had to listen to them older artists. No related tab, no searching for new artists from the convenience of your phone.

    If radio said Smokey Robinson is hot, then that’s what you’re going to have to listen to.

    Most people don’t dig for new music, so that’s a terrible point you’re trying to make.

    It’s only a small percentage of music fans that actively search for music, the majority only listen to what’s placed in front of them via radio, internet, playlists, social media.

    With the endless amounts of platforms I just listed there is way more fan programming today than ever before.

    This not even an argument.

  • Jun 8, 2024

    Dude talking about virtue signaling but gets shifty whenever you talk about his favorite artists who were capitalists too

    Edumist lmao

  • Jun 8, 2024
    browser

    Yep

    This was a great interview and he said a lot and it’s disappointing people gonna only focus on this + intentionally misunderstand this in both directions

    A related poignant thing he kept saying in the interview is “imagine if i told you in 2002 or whatever that you could have all the CD’s the entire Virgin megastore for $9.99”

    People trying to make this seem like Drake is just leaps and bounds above the 60’s-80’s acts severely misunderstood lol.

  • Jun 8, 2024
    xxxkiraxxx

    Money and music business s*** = culture ¿

  • Jun 8, 2024

    Really was a fascinating interview with some unique points that we probably should’ve have heard but this will be the sticking point for everyone else.

    Media literacy is really down the drain

  • Jun 8, 2024

    I’m sure if old heads were bumping Spotify and AM like us it would be a different story

  • Jun 8, 2024
    Uouj

    Most people don’t dig for new music, so that’s a terrible point you’re trying to make.

    It’s only a small percentage of music fans that actively search for music, the majority only listen to what’s placed in front of them via radio, internet, playlists, social media.

    With the endless amounts of platforms I just listed there is way more fan programming today than ever before.

    This not even an argument.

    That’s cap. There was way more control back then than today.

    People most definitely have not only more favorite artists than they would back then, but they have MANY more options than back then.

    You saying people don’t exercise that option is an assumption. Fact is they have more options

  • Jun 8, 2024
    ·
    1 reply

    His ass still trash tho

  • Stabane101

    His ass still trash tho

  • CRACKASTEPPAVEGAN

    What he say

    drake going independent would break the industry basically

    from a financial standpoint

  • Jun 8, 2024

    Eh I believe it