Reply
  • Aug 14
    austin_butler_fan4

    imagine this still got loading screens everywhere

  • All this fixation on a bunch of asterisks for what’s likely just the internal name
    She gotta stop with these Teams ass tweets already. We get it; games are in full production and there’s legit pressure on the studios now. Thank you Asha, but you can take us out the group chat now until there’s actual info

  • Aug 30
    ·
    2 replies

    They can make this Xbox console exclusive then release a limited time console bundle where you get an Xbox + elder scrolls 6 included no extra charge.

    Get people into the ecosystem then start pissing and s***ting on Sony with discs and gamepass

  • Aug 31
    ·
    1 reply
    Harlem

    They can make this Xbox console exclusive then release a limited time console bundle where you get an Xbox + elder scrolls 6 included no extra charge.

    Get people into the ecosystem then start pissing and s***ting on Sony with discs and gamepass

  • Aug 31
    ·
    1 reply

    Make playing online free
    Elder Scrolls exclusive
    disc based games still as an option
    fully backwards compatible

  • Aug 31
    ·
    1 reply
    HaroldsChicken

    Make playing online free
    Elder Scrolls exclusive
    disc based games still as an option
    fully backwards compatible

    the blueprint is right there. it's staring at them. the lane hasn't been this wide open since the xbone fumble

    CAPITALIZE ASHA, POUNCE NOW, ITS OUR ONLY CHANCE

  • Aug 31
    Harlem

    the blueprint is right there. it's staring at them. the lane hasn't been this wide open since the xbone fumble

    CAPITALIZE ASHA, POUNCE NOW, ITS OUR ONLY CHANCE

    Its about them truly seeing the momentary loss of paying for online as a win. If they announce physical games will continue on Helix. then they win over some devs too that want their games to continue to be physical or the option to do so. Sony could have easily said "we arent doing phsyical games first party but other devs can choose to do so". Making disc isnt eating up that much revenue nor is disc production lol

  • Tuneout 🎨
    Aug 31
    Humble

    “PS5”

    And this game ain’t coming out for another 4 years, they’re some sickos for announcing a teaser so dam nearly

  • Aug 31
    ·
    2 replies

    rooting for a corporation to take away a long-awaited sequel from other fans is only something you see from the pure desperation that Xbox owners feel

  • Aug 31
    ·
    1 reply
    maxxing

    rooting for a corporation to take away a long-awaited sequel from other fans is only something you see from the pure desperation that Xbox owners feel

    I dont own an Xbox. I am saying for Xbox to stay alive. you do this goofy thing with Xbox.

    yet you know what didnt used to be exclusive SPIDER MAN GAMES AND WOLVERINE GAMES. They arent coming to Xbox and in wolverine case and future games like X Men and further games arent coming to PC

    There are many examples of games that used to be on all consoles that no longer will be on xbox or pc.

    I owned a PS5 this generation . I never owned a xbox series s or X. if Xbox doesnt change something it will not survive. Starfield coming later to PS5 the same people that s*** on it due purely to console wars . Bought it sometimes or dealt with bugs

    Xbox needs to focus on surviving. If it doesnt do some exclusives it will fail. Halo remake, gears reloaded , fable 4 coming to playstation at launch not enough for you

    THIS IS THE FIRST GAME ANNOUNCED FOR THIS XBOX

    THE FIRST ONE AT ALL yet you think that should be multiplatform at launch?

    This is the reason many were sold on an Xbox console this gen at all and they cant even have it as a timed exclusvie?

    You own a pc you would be able to play it either way. they always make their games reaosnable specs to run on pc. You act as if people that want to play this wont be able to.

  • Aug 31

    This logic of xbox should have no exclusives would long term lead to Xbox shutting down. I think Xbox should have exclusives and timed exclusives because sony isnt going to stop. They need to build an install base. Unless they are giving up entirely on the console market its the only way. S*** I think not every game should come to gamepass at launch too.

  • Aug 31

    how you in playstation threads bragging about their exclusives and marketing deals but I say make the game that was originally announced for xbox never announced for PlayStation exclusive is wild to you?

  • Aug 31
    ·
    3 replies
    HaroldsChicken

    I dont own an Xbox. I am saying for Xbox to stay alive. you do this goofy thing with Xbox.

    yet you know what didnt used to be exclusive SPIDER MAN GAMES AND WOLVERINE GAMES. They arent coming to Xbox and in wolverine case and future games like X Men and further games arent coming to PC

    There are many examples of games that used to be on all consoles that no longer will be on xbox or pc.

    I owned a PS5 this generation . I never owned a xbox series s or X. if Xbox doesnt change something it will not survive. Starfield coming later to PS5 the same people that s*** on it due purely to console wars . Bought it sometimes or dealt with bugs

    Xbox needs to focus on surviving. If it doesnt do some exclusives it will fail. Halo remake, gears reloaded , fable 4 coming to playstation at launch not enough for you

    THIS IS THE FIRST GAME ANNOUNCED FOR THIS XBOX

    THE FIRST ONE AT ALL yet you think that should be multiplatform at launch?

    This is the reason many were sold on an Xbox console this gen at all and they cant even have it as a timed exclusvie?

    You own a pc you would be able to play it either way. they always make their games reaosnable specs to run on pc. You act as if people that want to play this wont be able to.

    You are so dumb

    What was the spider man game before insomniac spider-man? Can you name it?

    It had like a 50 on metacritic

    Skyrim and oblivion are in the 94-96 metacritic range, it’s one of the most iconic and acclaimed video game series of all time

    If Xbox was getting some non video-game license for a game where the previous entry was like in the 50s on meta, then got a team to make an amazing new game and had that as an exclusive, that would actually be a good thing for the fans. This is not, it’s the opposite.

  • Aug 31
    maxxing

    You are so dumb

    What was the spider man game before insomniac spider-man? Can you name it?

    It had like a 50 on metacritic

    Skyrim and oblivion are in the 94-96 metacritic range, it’s one of the most iconic and acclaimed video game series of all time

    If Xbox was getting some non video-game license for a game where the previous entry was like in the 50s on meta, then got a team to make an amazing new game and had that as an exclusive, that would actually be a good thing for the fans. This is not, it’s the opposite.

    ALL THE ACTIVISION GAMES ARE SPIDER MAN GAMES MAN.

    THEY HAVE AN EXCLUSIVE LICENSE ON SPIDER MAN GAMES RIGHT NOW

    There were good and bad spider man games the past 20 years.

    I am dumb because I say playstation has an exclusive license on hero games people of all consoles want to play?

    Final Fantasy XVI was a timed exclusive . Many of these games end with "exclusive to playstation for a year". When xbox did taht same goofy s*** with tomb raider I called it goofy. When xbox has done that in so many cases I have called it goofy. When it is their FIRST PARTY GAME why should it not be exclusive.

    You can name constant cases of sony and nintendo dropping first party games and they are EXCLUSIVE. Thats the point of paying for all of development. Getting to choose to do that or not based on relations with other platforms. Their relationship with sony right now isnt great. Sony wants to wipe them out not have the competition exist.

    why would they want an xbox who is saying "you can digitize your games" "gamepass this much value" "play anywhere" to exist.

  • Aug 31
    ·
    2 replies
    maxxing

    You are so dumb

    What was the spider man game before insomniac spider-man? Can you name it?

    It had like a 50 on metacritic

    Skyrim and oblivion are in the 94-96 metacritic range, it’s one of the most iconic and acclaimed video game series of all time

    If Xbox was getting some non video-game license for a game where the previous entry was like in the 50s on meta, then got a team to make an amazing new game and had that as an exclusive, that would actually be a good thing for the fans. This is not, it’s the opposite.

    and what? you just want sony to have zero competition in the console space for the rest of time?

    we just gonna let sony and nintendo (two japanese companies) have their way with the industry? we would be f***ed

    xbox has to do something now to shake things up for the health of the console world

  • Aug 31
    maxxing

    You are so dumb

    What was the spider man game before insomniac spider-man? Can you name it?

    It had like a 50 on metacritic

    Skyrim and oblivion are in the 94-96 metacritic range, it’s one of the most iconic and acclaimed video game series of all time

    If Xbox was getting some non video-game license for a game where the previous entry was like in the 50s on meta, then got a team to make an amazing new game and had that as an exclusive, that would actually be a good thing for the fans. This is not, it’s the opposite.

    SO YOUR LOGIC IS "THEY BOUGHT ONE OF THE DEVELOPERS OF THE HIGHEST RATED SERIES OF ALL TIME" to drop on playstation day 1 to what subsidize their purchase of the company same as they have done with call of duty? Call of duty makes perfect sense. A single player game ? no it doesnt nor is this standard applied to any other studio bought by a company. Sony can drop a sunset overdrive 2 and it will be exclusive to playstation. A lot of what they learned from sunset overdrive is present in spider man.

  • Aug 31
    ·
    1 reply
    maxxing

    rooting for a corporation to take away a long-awaited sequel from other fans is only something you see from the pure desperation that Xbox owners feel

    It’s gonna be on PC anyways

  • Aug 31
    Harlem

    and what? you just want sony to have zero competition in the console space for the rest of time?

    we just gonna let sony and nintendo (two japanese companies) have their way with the industry? we would be f***ed

    xbox has to do something now to shake things up for the health of the console world

    Maxxing does so under the guise of "think of all the elder scrolls players who dont have a pc and just have a Playstation console you are taking this game away from them". This s*** likely wont even be out until the next genertaion of consoles. If not cross gen. Microsoft already not thrilled likely about sony digital only. The cut on bringing a game to Playstation for the cuts they get likely isnt that great.

  • Aug 31
    ·
    2 replies
    NeonNigga23

    It’s gonna be on PC anyways

    Exactly and the pc settings of it wont require a mega computer its a Bethesda game it never has. Maxxing becomes a console warrior with Xbox doing something they need to do to survive. Not everything can be so consumer friendly its mind numbing.

    fable gears halo are all more part of the brand than elder scrolls and they gave them each one of those

    only for the sales of all of those not even be worth it.

  • Aug 31
    ·
    1 reply
    HaroldsChicken

    Exactly and the pc settings of it wont require a mega computer its a Bethesda game it never has. Maxxing becomes a console warrior with Xbox doing something they need to do to survive. Not everything can be so consumer friendly its mind numbing.

    fable gears halo are all more part of the brand than elder scrolls and they gave them each one of those

    only for the sales of all of those not even be worth it.


  • Aug 31
    risecrashing


    I dont think future Halo games are coming to Playstation anymore. The fact that this happened says what I am getting at. Starfield, Gears, Halo, Fable going to Playstation did more damage to them than good. If Playstation only players cant play an Xbox exclusive they want to play at launch because they dont have a PC. Guess what Xbox Helix point is get people that dont have a PC or never have into their ecosystem.

    There are plenty of games that only are on Playstation 5 for launch or at all. From studios that were formerly third party. People dont b**** because when a company decides to put their own money into buying a studio, paying for all of devleopment, its a single player game. What are we supposed to say

    OP defended Silent hill townfall being a PlayStation timed exclusive. Xbox wont exist if they just say "Elder Scrolls on PS5 at launch" as Playstation gamers continue to say 'whats the point of buying an xbox".

  • Aug 31
    ·
    edited
    ·
    2 replies
    Harlem

    and what? you just want sony to have zero competition in the console space for the rest of time?

    we just gonna let sony and nintendo (two japanese companies) have their way with the industry? we would be f***ed

    xbox has to do something now to shake things up for the health of the console world

    You guys are just being ridiculous at this point, you’re asking “and what?” as if it’s impossible for Xbox to get an exclusive any other way

    You act like it’s impossible for Microsoft to just BE NORMAL and get their “spider-man” exclusive the way PlayStation did. Put a team of passionate artists on some popular license that you can get because you have Microsoft money.

    why would I feel like buying an Xbox if their idea of getting loyal fans is restricting access to beloved video game franchise that’s hitting mid90s on meta. The previous spider-man games were getting 50s on meta, they had no cultural impact, it was basically just draining money from fans not actual classic games that make people interested in the ip. If they rebooted some old franchise like banjo kazooie for instance and made a game that was way better than nuts&bolts, that would be a perfect exclusive to get me to buy an Xbox

  • Aug 31
    ·
    1 reply
    maxxing
    · edited

    You guys are just being ridiculous at this point, you’re asking “and what?” as if it’s impossible for Xbox to get an exclusive any other way

    You act like it’s impossible for Microsoft to just BE NORMAL and get their “spider-man” exclusive the way PlayStation did. Put a team of passionate artists on some popular license that you can get because you have Microsoft money.

    why would I feel like buying an Xbox if their idea of getting loyal fans is restricting access to beloved video game franchise that’s hitting mid90s on meta. The previous spider-man games were getting 50s on meta, they had no cultural impact, it was basically just draining money from fans not actual classic games that make people interested in the ip. If they rebooted some old franchise like banjo kazooie for instance and made a game that was way better than nuts&bolts, that would be a perfect exclusive to get me to buy an Xbox

    You do realize Insomniac who is carrying Playstation this generation is a studio that Sony purchased right?

  • Aug 31
    ·
    1 reply
    HaroldsChicken

    You do realize Insomniac who is carrying Playstation this generation is a studio that Sony purchased right?

    Honestly you are the worst person to have a discussion with, you don’t even engage with any of my points you just try to sneak in “let me move the goalposts” gotcha moment

    What the f*** does that have to do with spider-man? Also Microsoft has plenty of companies they have bought that they can do what Sony did with insomniac. There’s nothing wrong with that method, it doesn’t involve ripping away a long awaited sequel from fans.

  • Aug 31
    ·
    2 replies
    maxxing

    You guys are just being ridiculous at this point, you’re asking “and what?” as if it’s impossible for Xbox to get an exclusive any other way

    You act like it’s impossible for Microsoft to just BE NORMAL and get their “spider-man” exclusive the way PlayStation did. Put a team of passionate artists on some popular license that you can get because you have Microsoft money.

    why would I feel like buying an Xbox if their idea of getting loyal fans is restricting access to beloved video game franchise that’s hitting mid90s on meta. The previous spider-man games were getting 50s on meta, they had no cultural impact, it was basically just draining money from fans not actual classic games that make people interested in the ip. If they rebooted some old franchise like banjo kazooie for instance and made a game that was way better than nuts&bolts, that would be a perfect exclusive to get me to buy an Xbox

    and you are not realizing that xbox way too down to just conjure up some spider man bullshit exclusive out of thin air

    marvel gave them blade. they gave sony wolverine and spiderman. it isn't comparable

    xbox is inherently at a disadvantage with anything they do. even their games are reviewed harsher while sonys mid doodoo exclusives are gassed and nominated for GOTY and s*** which just brainwashes people even more

    xbox only shot is making something like Elder Scrolls exclusive. that'll actually have motion

1
...
20
21
22
...
24