Kinda but imo a bit different

But also imo Identity Theft is more scummy n brazen if that makes sense n a bit diff

This is not the crime tier list bible tho

Yeah

I almost put it in the i mostly dont care section because its not serious to me unless its like serious super plagiarism or straight ripping but i feel thats a bit different n isnt really bootlegging

What if the world blows up tomorrow

Im not writing a book bro make your list thats mine

Alphabet boys itt

No youre not

Insurances exist and the network is too big

Youre only hurting the individuals if the person(s) is considered at fault for the form of theft

Like if the person seems to not gaf that youre putting candy in your pocket when they could clearly see you doing it

But in most cases its actually advised that workers dont interfere with serious theft n stealing because human lives are worth more than product/money & they can easily replace the product/money if it isnt a large scale (which 98 percent of the time it isnt large scale) situation.

The employees do not get hurt unless its petty theft they could have easily corrected.

This is all regarding major buisnesses like a Walmart.

Its not the employees fault nor do they get punished 9.5/10 times.

Unless its pure negligence. Like dude didnt lock the store up afterhours etc. Or again if it involves petty theft.

Gotta keep the criminal tolerability program updated

I’m not really ok with any serious day to day crimes. I don’t like criminals. Depending on the circumstances i don’t have an issue with revolutions/ insurrections etc

Almost thought of that or a 5th tier of "should be legal".

Which s***work & d*** using would be in.

But then i thought it goes against the overall justification of the other things i mentioned in my 2nd post. I also dodnt want to get into state by state issues, like gay rights are fine n accepted in a good amount of states besides a few n im fine with gay rights.

Idk, might add it if i can think of a few "good" or "should be legal" things.

Yeah but thats so rare n unlikely especially for the majors

I agree tho, but most the time no employees is considered at fault nor punished as I mentioned a few posts ago

Uh unregulated/dirty d****, selling to minors n pregnant women, false d**** n killings/sharking over d**** are not lit

But thats why i said i mostly dont care

Selling weed or some coke etc. Or just an average everyday d*** seller idgaf

The few extremes/specifics where i do care is the above

Ty

Tim Pool type beat

We on the same page for the most part

If a person is literally gonna die or lose their kids n their only out is identity theft im not gonna super chastise them even tho its still f***ed up

But wrong

I dont think any of it is totally "okay"

Read 2nd post

What does this mean

It depends. If someone out here being shiesty and lacing stuff then they definitely deserve to have the book thrown at them. The same with the dudes that sell d**** (even weed idc) to kids.

Fraud as in lying in taxes, lying on fourms that you live in a different district so your kid can go to better school, falsifying info for benefits, writing hot bounced checks etc. idc overall

When you say Fraud in a legal sense its almost always regarding governmental frauding

Loan sharking is purposely putting another into a wrongful bullshit contract on top of not even going to fulfill said bullshit contract that forces the victim to pay extensive illegal overpriced fees that can also lead into threat and physical harm. And its hard for the victim to make a case against it and most people are sadly dumb enough to think its still legit.

You become basically a money slave to a perpetrator preying on you from the beginning that lasts as long as the sharker sees fit.

And i think you saw the Dont Accept Slavery and Slave-like part. Which sharking is part of.

Boy you dumb asl

I dont think most people are stealing from corporations as a way to "attack" or "get back" at them lol

What do you mean exactly?

The only thing i can think of is that politics def needs an age ceiling.

Its ridiculous that judges and politicians can be in their position forever even if they dont know modern context & changing times.

This a smart post

I would go further and say that their should be an age cap at both ends for political voting. It should be like 18-maybe 70, not trying to be harsh but 80 year olds aren’t voting for real world long term issues that require investment they are voting for short term and often narrow minded issues

criminalizes taking footage inside animal farms and slaughterhouses