rich scouser

2y

I think it is ludicrous that kids can watch hardcore p***ography on Twitter very easily and almost accidentalmente and there has been no mention of that as a possible reason advertisers aren't so keen on the platform...

I say that to say it definitely shouldn't be the only change being made to p***ography on the Internet. The EU is bothered about sites storing cookies without permission and enforced that but kids watching p*** all good?

insertcoolnamehere

2y

Unless you keeping the same energy for other things like energy drinks and other substances that negatively affect your body i dont wanna hear it dawg lol

OnyxShine9

2y

That is absolute f***ing paranoid insanity I don’t think anyone is coming at it from that angle. I would be EXTREMELY surprised if that were true.

OnyxShine9

2y

A question for averyrone in agreement with this: it should extend to all websites that feature p***, not just p*** websites, no? A person can lie about their age and get access to the GG section on KTT2 (there were like 2 openly stated 15 year olds there at one point, mods should be the only one with access to view ages)

_Kee

2y

It's even so easy to find it on Reddit, they just need to turn on NSFW and it'll be there.

rich scouser

2y

It's not a right or left issue. To try and portray it as one is very silly.

Smoofer

2y

Idk at least on mobile they don’t let you see s***

insertcoolnamehere

2y

Unless you keeping the same energy for other things like energy drinks and other substances that negatively affect your body i dont wanna hear it dawg lol

HURRY UP K DOG

2y

What I'm not talking about this ID restriction for p*** specifically.

I'm saying the right's been screaming to high heavens about protecting kids from sexually explicit material but they only do that to push the agenda that LBGT = pedophilia. They don't give a s*** if a kid sees a titty.

Stardust

2y

Crazy how right wingers in every western country keep using "wont somebody think of the kids!!!" as an excuse for pushing their bs and it somehow keeps working

sonyatv

2y

fools will just go on twitter or tumblr or reddit or ktt. republicans just want brownie points with their fanbase

OnyxShine9

2y

A question for averyrone in agreement with this: it should extend to all websites that feature p***, not just p*** websites, no? A person can lie about their age and get access to the GG section on KTT2 (there were like 2 openly stated 15 year olds there at one point, mods should be the only one with access to view ages)

OnyxShine9

2y

· edited

I would still be very surprised if that was true.

In any case, it has the more abundantly positive impact on children of any orientation, not just straight. The bottom line is kids don’t need to be watching p***. I mean, nobody needs to be watching p***, but especially children due to its addictive and exclusively detrimental impact on the person, no matter who they liked. I think that’s where most peoples hearts are on this matter. Whether or not p*** use has any impact on orientation is an absolute non-factor in it. Gays existed before p*** and they will continue to after p***.

insertcoolnamehere

2y

Niggas more concerned about p*** addiction than legitimate alcohol addiction that actually kills people lol

Woo yall really moving backwards

rami

2y

idiotic ass country

OnyxShine9

2y

I would still be very surprised if that was true.

In any case, it has the more abundantly positive impact on children of any orientation, not just straight. The bottom line is kids don’t need to be watching p***. I mean, nobody needs to be watching p***, but especially children due to its addictive and exclusively detrimental impact on the person, no matter who they liked. I think that’s where most peoples hearts are on this matter. Whether or not p*** use has any impact on orientation is an absolute non-factor in it. Gays existed before p*** and they will continue to after p***.

ragedsycokiller

2y

I hope those two 15 year old's aren't in there anymore

HURRY UP K DOG

2y

· edited

Your missing the point I am saying.

Its a fact that the right is attempting to remove LBGT books from schools in the name of "protecting the children"
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/mtg-george-santos-co-sponsoring-125722295.html

What I am talking has nothing to do with p***, its the feigning of "protecting the children" from explicit materials when they are not doing this at all to "protect children from sexually explicit materials" but to marginalize a group of people they do not like.

If they were actually going at removing p*** and making it hard to access, that is one thing. But they are not. They are only worried about the children when they may read a book telling them its okay to be gay.

Children should not be watching p*** I agree on that.

paradise valley

2y

· edited

There were countless campaigns and laws regarding alcohol use for decades tho?

ragedsycokiller

2y

P*** is now a leftist issue

ragedsycokiller

2y

"It could be that Dees’ constituents were alarmed by the results of a recent survey on teens and p***ography, which was published by Common Sense Media a week before Dees’ bill was introduced and was widely reported by media outlets like CNN and The New York Times. That survey found that 73 percent of teens reported that they consumed p***ography, with more than half claiming they’d been exposed to p*** accidentally and 15 percent of minors reporting they were first exposed to p*** at age 10 or younger."

This is literally why this is an issue. You don't think this has harmful effects for future generations?

On the other hand, security is a big risk for any legal law abiding adult.

"However age verification works, Kelley said that this kind of data collection could increase risks of data breaches for age verification services and risks of blackmail for users. Bad actors may even set up p*** sites specifically to profit off data or threaten to expose users."