Drake stans really be 25 year old men talm bout this s*** really bout take over tik tok !!
So what were you gonna say?
why have a convo with a 15 year old kid in the netherlands about global politics lol
Literally people too stupid to read or do basic research are calling me out lol
Do some basic research into what companies like Instagram do with your data and the involvement of goverment agencies
why have a convo with a 15 year old kid in the netherlands about global politics lol
Im 21. Why wouldnt u my man
That TML guy spends a lot of money on cologne cause his p**** stank 😂🤣💯
On god
Do some basic research into what companies like Instagram do with your data and the involvement of goverment agencies
Bro no offense but you sound like a dumbass kid. It’s okay to read every once in a while
This thread was suppose to be about a drake dance. mfs always derailing my s***
This thread was suppose to be about a drake dance. mfs always derailing my s***
This s*** is more interesting than the 1000th bait thread about Drake
Bro no offense but you sound like a dumbass kid. It’s okay to read every once in a while
Yeah okay this nigga has no arguments
Instagram and other US social media only gives the government access to that information for criminal cases with a warrant. If you had any knowledge on Chinese governments policies you would know every social media entity is required to give all their data unfiltered to the Chinese gov. Also they make these companies directly censor content that puts them in a negative light, like the Hong Kong protests.
Please do some basic research my man
Tik tok and douyin run on completely separate servers, one for Chinese regulations and one for the global market. It’s banned a lot of things but literally never at China’s request
you still haven't provided evidence of the CPC controlling tik tok so please don't stand on your weird high horse of "reading" and finding "evidence" when you do null
Tik tok and douyin run on completely separate servers, one for Chinese regulations and one for the global market. It’s banned a lot of things but literally never at China’s request
you still haven't provided evidence of the CPC controlling tik tok so please don't stand on your weird high horse of "reading" and finding "evidence" when you do null
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/sep/25/revealed-how-tiktok-censors-videos-that-do-not-please-beijing
https://rufposten.de/blog/2019/12/05/privacy-analysis-of-tiktoks-app-and-website/
I'm British and even I'm not going to read a Guardian article with no references on this subject.
I'll check out the second link in a sec and feedback.
I'm British and even I'm not going to read a Guardian article with no references on this subject.
I'll check out the second link in a sec and feedback.
the Guardian is a reputable paper and is reporting on leaked information, i dont really know how that doesnt qualify as a source.
the Guardian is a reputable paper and is reporting on leaked information, i dont really know how that doesnt qualify as a source.
It's a source but not a good one. It isn't peer reviewed journalism. There's no citation and there's not even a follow up.
Compared to the second one which is technical journalism. It's a concrete a***ysis and there's barely opinion.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/sep/25/revealed-how-tiktok-censors-videos-that-do-not-please-beijing
https://rufposten.de/blog/2019/12/05/privacy-analysis-of-tiktoks-app-and-website/
This isn’t them Sharing the data this is them using an algorithm which removes content that goes against Chinese government views
It’s like how you can’t mention tianmen square on the Chinese Internet. All this is saying is the app automatically filters this stuff
tik tok is an app created by communist china
the same china that puts muslims in concentration camps and is the sole reason we are dealing with a worldwide pandemic
please don't discuss tik tok on this website
Instagram is an app created by capitalist USA
The same USA that lead to the death of millions of muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan
Please don't discuss Instagram on this platform
It's a source but not a good one. It isn't peer reviewed journalism. There's no citation and there's not even a follow up.
Compared to the second one which is technical journalism. It's a concrete a***ysis and there's barely opinion.
fym it isn’t peer-reviewed? its a newspaper article not a scientific journal
it’s got no references because its based on reporting information that was revealed to the paper. you have to take its word for it based on the papers’ reputation. how is that any different to many other journalistic articles?