WOMANPUNCHER69

Yea I got a fetish… for COMMODITIES

Ur just jealous I met the GOAT bro! #NDP #TaxTheRich (but not too much)

me when my $200 brain dead order shows up in the next two weeks

whats the order?

MORBID ANGEL CHAIR AND TWO LIP BALMS

plus my boys got something; dog collars and ice trays, stickers, tees, small stuff

The moment this thread was renamed into COMMUNISM THREAD was very powerful

What's the context cuz I'd love to

Isn't this the guy that thought atoms were a bourgeoisie concept

And also that women pissed out of their vaginas

isn’t that a trot thing

The only thing I could draw from:

The more science learns about matter, however, the more “unexpected” properties of matter it discovers, the more zealously does the decadent philosophical thought of the bourgeoisie try to use the new properties or manifestations of matter to show that matter is not matter. The progress of natural science in the mastering of matter is paralleled by a philosophical struggle against materialism. Certain philosophers and even some scientists have tried to utilize the phenomena of radioactivity for the purpose of struggle against materialism: there used to be atoms, elements, which were the basis of matter and of materialist thinking, but now this atom has come to pieces in our hands, has broken up into electrons, and at the very beginning of the popularity of the electronic theory a struggle has even flared up in our party around the question whether the electrons testify for or against materialism. Whoever is interested in these questions will read with great profit Vladimir Ilyich’s work on Materialism and Empirio-Criticism. In fact neither the “mysterious” phenomena of radioactivity nor the no less “mysterious” phenomena of wireless transmission of electro-magnetic waves do the slightest damage to materialism.

From Radio, Science, Technique and Society.

He’s trying to tell people this thread is transphobic because of the discussion on the last page about the Housephone thread

It’s an IMT thing, who are a sect of trots yes

They think the Big Bang is impossible because it’s “not dialectical”

i keep forgetting you aren't the mf from the tweets

Bukharin: Well, that's quite simple. There is always a logical way out. If I say that I've met with a certain person, then it's out of tactical considerations.

If I say that I didn't meet with him, then it's because of conspiratorial consider- ations. There is no such dialectic that allows you to say that someone has both met and not met someone else.

ctfu the man hated dialectic’s till his death i respect it

Feel bad for Tomsky though imagine being depressed and then being accused of zinoviev-trotskiest terrorist during the start of the great purge i would have killed my self too

This is the edgiest avy on the website, edgier than any shock image or gross-out image, there is just something about this Dragon Ball side-character that probably only appears in movies that is so incredibly edgy in combination with the WOMANPUNCHER69, I honestly respect the aesthetic

Any good books on the fall of the ussr ?

Like other than general history of it here’s one that’s been on my to read list for a min
goodreads.com/book/show/1816593.Revolution_from_Above

Will look into it!

Do you have any works about general history that you would recommend too btw

Oswald had also run a fake pro-Cuba group in New Orleans of which he was the only member, with a listed address to a building owned by an FBI agent named Guy Banister who published literature for Cuban anti-communist groups. I don't know if Oswald shot Kennedy or not and I don't get too caught up in the bullet theories, but he struck me as a kinda stupid guy who was led around, and it's quite possible he was just put in the right place at the right time when the serious people shot him. Oliver Stone believes he was shot from the front, the Grassy Knoll being the most likely place. I've been there and it's an interesting thing because it's a recessed position and you can lean back and pretend like you're aiming a rifle at where JFK was when this impact happened and it would've been a near straight shot. Oswald himself said "I'm a patsy" as they were dragging him to the parking lot where a mobster shot him.

As for why they did it, I think JFK had a liberal (and rather Catholic seeming) foreign policy "vision" which was anticommunist, but he reasoned that communism was a reaction to technological shock in poor countries, and that it wasn't worth fighting communists in countries where they had majority support because you couldn't expect to win against a whole population anyways. So, instead, the U.S. should support non-aligned third-world leaders to help them hold out as long as possible like Sukarno in Indonesia (who were also critically supported by communists in those countries), basically try to avoid a direct confrontation and be this "progressive" third way in the world. And I think the ultra-right forces in the intelligence services, with connections to the Mafia and anticommunist Cuban exiles and mercenaries figured this would be a disaster for the U.S. and they were triggered by what they considered to be a betrayal by JFK not to lend enough support to the Bay of Pigs invasion, and a lot of their buddies died on the beach and were taken prisoner because of that.

Another weird thing, Oswald was holding up two newspapers in that photo of himself with the rifle, the Daily Worker and The Militant, so the newspapers of the CPUSA and the SWP. What kinda communist holds up copies of the CPUSA paper and a Trotskyist paper? Most people would have no idea that doesn't make any sense.

Class Struggles in the USSR by Bettelheim is a good historical/political economy a***ysis of the USSR

Wtf