I was watching this video
!https://youtu.be/cfaubxeS5HU?si=luyFJzNGfzFbv1Ir“end of globalization” sigh feel like im already gonna hate this
“end of globalization” sigh feel like im already gonna hate this
Lol yeah its full of the usual liberal s*** but useful info in it too. This article I found basically summarizes the video atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/econographics/the-ira-and-chips-act-are-supercharging-us-manufacturing-construction
Deng and everyone after him quoting marx to justify all their bs is hilarious I love that stuff
It's happened multiple time by now it always funny to me how fast the open door free trade cultists become protectionist when US hegemony is undermined
What do yall make of the resurgence of US manufacturing in the past year?
its mostly overblown, the actual phenomenon of "nearshoring" to mexico to cut down on transportation costs since COVID while keeping labor cheap is a lot more interesting and will probably have a huge impact on the potential for a large proletarian movement around our southern border
https://bpb-us-e2.wpmucdn.com/sites.middlebury.edu/dist/2/3378/files/2015/01/DEmilio-Capitalism-and-Gay-Identity.pdf
still a banger 40 years later
sounds interesting, is there a podcast version of this?
I think it remains to be seen if it does meaningfully challenge Chinese dominance, but at the very least the sheer volume in subsidies has successfully reinvigorated American manufacturing. It also has the adverse effect of further alienating the Europeans who're already put in a tight situation by the Ukraine War so there's that.
further alienating the Europeans
sounds interesting, is there a podcast version of this?
youre a funny person with some funny jokes but yes I'm sure their is an audiobook
Another W for capitalism
> does a social program that directly undermines capitalism
"A w for capitalism"
> does a social program that directly undermines capitalism
"A w for capitalism"
what social programs don’t inheritely undercut capitalism and can be used to further sustain capitalism look at FDR and Keynesian influenced economics post ww2
what social programs don’t inheritely undercut capitalism and can be used to further sustain capitalism look at FDR and Keynesian influenced economics post ww2
wouldn't keynesian economics not be stable in the long term for capitalism since the realities of limited resources and the need for eventual growth
eventually austerity and privitization is the final decision being made because u cant just pump s*** into programs since u'll run out of s***
wouldn't keynesian economics not be stable in the long term for capitalism since the realities of limited resources and the need for eventual growth
eventually austerity and privitization is the final decision being made because u cant just pump s*** into programs since u'll run out of s***
Keynesian economics and post ww2 social democracy’s provided a temporary solution for the workers question for bourgeois states that let them buy off their workers, social programs also help end the great depression in america for the time they were implemented they absolutely bought time for capitalism until it was no longer needed
what social programs don’t inheritely undercut capitalism and can be used to further sustain capitalism look at FDR and Keynesian influenced economics post ww2
well actually ur right its not an inherent undercutting in this case
it helps sustain it
Keynesian economics and post ww2 social democracy’s provided a temporary solution for the workers question for bourgeois states that let them buy off their workers, social programs also help end the great depression in america for the time they were implemented they absolutely bought time for capitalism until it was no longer needed
i dig i dig
@Regard ur stupid btw
MLs will ridicule open liberals for thinking an increase in black CEOs, managers or businesses will bring about systemic change, but then swing around and praise Asian or African capitalist states building tomato processing plants as an 'attack on imperialism'. Make it make sense