Buddy we’ve moved on from this. They’re talking about colonization or some s*** rn.

You know classical anarchist theory isn't worshipped like "Marxists" do right?

Yeah bc u bozos dont know s*** and are lifestylists who never pick up a book

I think they’re wrong on a ideological level as well however then difference between you and them is that they can actually articulate their points

glad im not the only one lmao deadass dying over here, i just skipped to the last few pages where he writes about the state

You could make the same argument for MLs not even being able to interpret Marx

What happened to criticism before the governments took it away because they were getting criticized too much by the people?

Oh, but you just said we worshipped classics? Which one is it? Is it One Mic or is it Oochie Wallie you dumb ass yankee kak?

But if the designing of the future and the proclamation of ready-made solutions for all time is not our affair, then we realize all the more clearly what we have to accomplish in the present—I am speaking of a ruthless criticism of everything existing, ruthless in two senses: The criticism must not be afraid of its own conclusions, nor of conflict with the powers that be. - Karl Marx

since China is the topic what do yall think of the China is a Social-Imperlaist power by the CPI(M)

revaim.org/uploads/booklets/China%20-%20A%20Modern%20Social-Imperialist%20Power.pdf

Go in the anarkiddie thread with that bullshit man

ill look into it, thanks

When Mao crushed the Maoists and called them "anarchists" who called out the government for developing a new bourgeoise "red capitalist" class

cool man but what does that gotta do with my post

F*** outta this thread you amerikak

Nothing much, I just find it funny considering they were right and some Maoists even defend the modern government considering its actions against their own ideology, I'll check out the paper though.

Also it's hilarious how some MLs and Nazbols will call out "liberal idpol" then use it when they receive criticism of their ideology.

You guys have as much cognitive dissonance as the right

Ur a kak, cry all you want about it

I dont hate KAKS i just hate your type

The know it better western schmuck

Pig skin devil

You're white, c***

No im not lmfao

This dude seriously claimed China taking HK back is like Zionism. Gonna block him now

The Stalin turn of the late 1920s brought these contradictions into sharp relief. The Stalinist drive to make all regions of the USSR economically productive and harnessed in the service of modernization meant that the Soviet administrators in Siberia began to demand the collectivization of Siberian reindeer, fishing and fur industries. The theory was that a scientific management of these resources would push the Siberian peoples out of their primitivism and be a boon to the Soviet state. Not surprisingly, the impact on the region's reindeer herds in particular was disastrous and many of the native Siberians saw the state as destructively intrusive.

here's one more thing, considering MLs love using indigenous liberation movements as a talking point

it’s much nicer that way

the blocking

Just block these idiots