some dumbass anarhist s***
People gotta stop calling everything they don't like reactionary
Yall might enjoy this groove too

Shame that Taliban destroyed Afghan philaharominc's band Tars
@krishna_bound whats a good book on the history of iran that avoids non material bias
Social Democracy is but a band-aid over the contradictions of Capitalism. The ideology as a whole only emerged in the face of the USSR - the bourgeoisie, terrified that the workers might follow their example, granted them concessions in the form of Social Democracy. And once the existential threat to Capitalism that was the USSR was gone, the gains of Social Democracy were destroyed through Austerity.
Social democracy works on the assumption that the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat have a shared existential interest.. they do not. That both classes will work together for mutual benefit, that the relationship between the worker and boss is not parasitic, but reciprocal, that the two classes are working in equal exchange, and problems only arise when one side takes more than the other. This is, of course, utter horseshit. Workers and bosses do not have an equal relationship. Their relations are inherently parasitic, they have class interests that are incompatible with each other and will always lead to conflict. Social democracy is a foolish endeavour taken on by people unwilling to accept the hard reality that some dream of a fantastic cooperation of all, regardless of class, is impossible. They acknowledge class conflict, but see it has the disease rather than a symptom of Capitalism. They speak out against the "system"... and then refuse to fight it. They speak against "systemic racism", "systemic inequality", "systemic discrimination"... tell me, you reformers, what is the system you speak of? If these things exist (which they do), and they must be defeated (which they should), why not dig up the root, instead of clipping the leaves?
Even this does not even begin to cover the fact that Social-Democracy works within capitalism, and as a result, it must still appease the bourgeoisie, which it does through cycles of ruthless imperialism and neocolonialism, exploitation that works to fund their healthcare and free college, because billionaires sure as s*** aren't paying for that! Even more, Social Democrats, as much as they claim themselves to be radicals, are, at the end of the day, cowardly traitors who would rather have a majority of the earth squander in poverty so a rich minority can enjoy luxury - they only ask the citizens of empires be allowed some of the spoils. And should any organisation or force challenge them and the system they denounce in words but worship in actions, they are the first to take up arms against real revolutionaries. They are cowards scared of real change, so much so they will do anything to defeat actual revolutionary forces. Their ideology is short sighted and does not address the inherent contradictions within capitalism. Capitalism cannot be humanised; you cannot tame a sick dog.
Social Democracy is but a band-aid over the contradictions of Capitalism. The ideology as a whole only emerged in the face of the USSR - the bourgeoisie, terrified that the workers might follow their example, granted them concessions in the form of Social Democracy. And once the existential threat to Capitalism that was the USSR was gone, the gains of Social Democracy were destroyed through Austerity.
Social democracy works on the assumption that the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat have a shared existential interest.. they do not. That both classes will work together for mutual benefit, that the relationship between the worker and boss is not parasitic, but reciprocal, that the two classes are working in equal exchange, and problems only arise when one side takes more than the other. This is, of course, utter horseshit. Workers and bosses do not have an equal relationship. Their relations are inherently parasitic, they have class interests that are incompatible with each other and will always lead to conflict. Social democracy is a foolish endeavour taken on by people unwilling to accept the hard reality that some dream of a fantastic cooperation of all, regardless of class, is impossible. They acknowledge class conflict, but see it has the disease rather than a symptom of Capitalism. They speak out against the "system"... and then refuse to fight it. They speak against "systemic racism", "systemic inequality", "systemic discrimination"... tell me, you reformers, what is the system you speak of? If these things exist (which they do), and they must be defeated (which they should), why not dig up the root, instead of clipping the leaves?
Even this does not even begin to cover the fact that Social-Democracy works within capitalism, and as a result, it must still appease the bourgeoisie, which it does through cycles of ruthless imperialism and neocolonialism, exploitation that works to fund their healthcare and free college, because billionaires sure as s*** aren't paying for that! Even more, Social Democrats, as much as they claim themselves to be radicals, are, at the end of the day, cowardly traitors who would rather have a majority of the earth squander in poverty so a rich minority can enjoy luxury - they only ask the citizens of empires be allowed some of the spoils. And should any organisation or force challenge them and the system they denounce in words but worship in actions, they are the first to take up arms against real revolutionaries. They are cowards scared of real change, so much so they will do anything to defeat actual revolutionary forces. Their ideology is short sighted and does not address the inherent contradictions within capitalism. Capitalism cannot be humanised; you cannot tame a sick dog.
This message is for the socdems and people who may be interested in left wing thought and are probably looking into the social Democratic line.
Social Democracy is but a band-aid over the contradictions of Capitalism. The ideology as a whole only emerged in the face of the USSR - the bourgeoisie, terrified that the workers might follow their example, granted them concessions in the form of Social Democracy. And once the existential threat to Capitalism that was the USSR was gone, the gains of Social Democracy were destroyed through Austerity.
Social democracy works on the assumption that the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat have a shared existential interest.. they do not. That both classes will work together for mutual benefit, that the relationship between the worker and boss is not parasitic, but reciprocal, that the two classes are working in equal exchange, and problems only arise when one side takes more than the other. This is, of course, utter horseshit. Workers and bosses do not have an equal relationship. Their relations are inherently parasitic, they have class interests that are incompatible with each other and will always lead to conflict. Social democracy is a foolish endeavour taken on by people unwilling to accept the hard reality that some dream of a fantastic cooperation of all, regardless of class, is impossible. They acknowledge class conflict, but see it has the disease rather than a symptom of Capitalism. They speak out against the "system"... and then refuse to fight it. They speak against "systemic racism", "systemic inequality", "systemic discrimination"... tell me, you reformers, what is the system you speak of? If these things exist (which they do), and they must be defeated (which they should), why not dig up the root, instead of clipping the leaves?
Even this does not even begin to cover the fact that Social-Democracy works within capitalism, and as a result, it must still appease the bourgeoisie, which it does through cycles of ruthless imperialism and neocolonialism, exploitation that works to fund their healthcare and free college, because billionaires sure as s*** aren't paying for that! Even more, Social Democrats, as much as they claim themselves to be radicals, are, at the end of the day, cowardly traitors who would rather have a majority of the earth squander in poverty so a rich minority can enjoy luxury - they only ask the citizens of empires be allowed some of the spoils. And should any organisation or force challenge them and the system they denounce in words but worship in actions, they are the first to take up arms against real revolutionaries. They are cowards scared of real change, so much so they will do anything to defeat actual revolutionary forces. Their ideology is short sighted and does not address the inherent contradictions within capitalism. Capitalism cannot be humanised; you cannot tame a sick dog.
Social democracy works on the assumption that the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat have a shared existential interest.. they do not. That both classes will work together for mutual benefit, that the relationship between the worker and boss is not parasitic, but reciprocal
sounds a lot like class collaboration that reminds me what was that saying that some Georgian said social democracy is the moderate wing of what again
Social democracy works on the assumption that the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat have a shared existential interest.. they do not. That both classes will work together for mutual benefit, that the relationship between the worker and boss is not parasitic, but reciprocal
sounds a lot like class collaboration that reminds me what was that saying that some Georgian said social democracy is the moderate wing of what again
"Fascism is the bourgeoisie’s fighting organization that relies on the active support of Social-Democracy. Social-Democracy is objectively the moderate wing of fascism." - J.V. Stalin
"Fascism is the bourgeoisie’s fighting organization that relies on the active support of Social-Democracy. Social-Democracy is objectively the moderate wing of fascism." - J.V. Stalin
I don’t think anyone in all of history has understood what Fascism actually is including Fascists themselves
I don’t think anyone in all of history has understood what Fascism actually is including Fascists themselves
what do you think fascism is ? both the original and the b******ized version by the Nazi, since you make that distinction a lot.
I know marxist’s tend to explain it as the last weapon that bourgeoisie will use against a socialist movement.
what do you think fascism is ? both the original and the b******ized version by the Nazi, since you make that distinction a lot.
I know marxist’s tend to explain it as the last weapon that bourgeoisie will use against a socialist movement.
I’m at an airport atm so let me get back to my PC in like an hour or so and I’ll write a response since it’s gonna be longer lol
This message is for the socdems and people who may be interested in left wing thought and are probably looking into the social Democratic line.
Posting that to ig CC @Womanpuncher69
Posting that to ig CC @Womanpuncher69
my page got taken down what was your ig again?
my page got taken down what was your ig again?
You had some nice ass content
You had some nice ass content
too much Hezbollah content frankito was prolly reporting from a fake page
too much Hezbollah content frankito was prolly reporting from a fake page
Dawg how u gonna support hezbollah with pronouns in ur bio