I forgot about this s***

Memoryholed because of how much of a disaster it was. Let’s not forget they literally EXECUTED TWO INNOCENT BLACK TEENAGERS. Overall s*** was funny af but it was also a disaster and that shouldn’t be forgotten. People died because of it.

The last 3 pages were literally a debate over a disagreement on a topic

you just be posting to see yourself talk lmao don’t even bother reading other comments

Anarchism talk made me remember this s***

I always appreciate the long form posts and discussions in here, learned a lot from yall fr

Man that’s the A sign of the avengers

I don't think so, I mean maybe some do idk, but then they haven't read Mao correctly lol:

When imperialism launches a war of aggression against such a country, all its various classes, except for some traitors, can temporarily unite in a national war against imperialism. At such a time, the contradiction between imperialism and the country concerned becomes the principal contradiction, while all the contradictions among the various classes within the country (including what was the principal contradiction, between the feudal system and the great masses of the people) are temporarily relegated to a secondary and subordinate position. So it was in China in the Opium War of 1840, the Sino-Japanese War of 1894 and the Yi Ho Tuan War of 1900, and so it is now in the present Sino-Japanese War.

^ from on contradiction, he said imperialism is only temporary the principal contradiction when faced with imperialist aggression, this isn't any different than what MLs said before and after, and even Stalin pretty much expressed the same stance in foundations of Leninism:

The same must be said of the revolutionary character of national movements in general. The unquestionably revolutionary character of the vast majority of national movements is as relative and peculiar as is the possible revolutionary character of certain particular national movements. The revolutionary character of a national movement under the conditions of imperialist oppression does not necessarily presuppose the existence of proletarian elements in the movement, the existence of a revolutionary or a republican programme of the movement, the existence of a democratic basis of the movement. The struggle that the Emir of Afghanistan is waging for the independence of Afghanistan is objectively a revolutionary struggle, despite the monarchist views of the Emir and his associates, for it weakens, disintegrates and undermines imperialism; whereas the struggle waged by such "desperate" democrats and "Socialists," "revolutionaries" and republicans as, for example, Kerensky and Tsereteli, Renaudel and Scheidemann, Chernov and Dan, Henderson and Clynes, during the imperialist war was a reactionary struggle, for its results was the embellishment, the strengthening, the victory, of imperialism.

It's not exactly the same stance that Baathists take in subordinating class to nationalism as a default stance.

I'm saying lmao what

u love staying itt otherwise we wouldn’t see ur pitiful ass in here

so. make urself at home

happy May Day & Eid Mubarak fam ☪️

might start mlm basic course today idk

i know you're referring to marxist-leninist-maoism but i will never be able to read MLM as anything other than multi-level marketing

its the exact opposite for me LMAO

what about men loving men

which one or just a local one

the one published by flp

💀💀💀💀💀

truly nasty work
descentrealizer.medium.com/who-killed-antonio-mays-jr-at-chop-chaz-f8848953307d