Remember when scott made a communist trump bot that kept saying "my uncle fred always told us to buy s*** from china and now i have all this useless s*** from china but hey that’s what my uncle asked us to do so"
ig the althusser / maoian conception of contradiction as minutiae to the point of discombobulation, and therefore being unable to strictly convey where contradiction and "natural causes" are delineated
or in other words how would you define contradiction if not the fusion and subsequent resolution of granular natural phenomenon?
@Scratchin_Bandit please use the AI text gen thing on this
@Scratchin_Bandit please use the AI text gen thing on this
ig the althusser / maoian conception of contradiction as minutiae to the point of discombobulation, and therefore being unable to strictly convey where contradiction and "natural causes" are delineated
or in other words how would you define contradiction if not the fusion and subsequent resolution of granular natural phenomenon? This is also apparent when considering any aspect. Hegel never uses this concept for us: His work contains nothing but monologues or aphorisms designed solely with reference towards his own subject matter which make use only from a purely empirical perspective. And even then he rarely makes much sense anyway (so that it becomes less interesting after reading one page – who could blame him?). But at least we got some things out here : In essence Monism requires two factors; either unity, meaning all phenomena within nature constitute its substance ; OR chaos, means certain processes do not occur while others happen over and above them just by chance! That's simply plain nonsense
Bro im dying
ig the althusser / maoian conception of contradiction as minutiae to the point of discombobulation, and therefore being unable to strictly convey where contradiction and "natural causes" are delineated
or in other words how would you define contradiction if not the fusion and subsequent resolution of granular natural phenomenon?
'The two contradictions found between a physical object and an environment – this is called physics'. This does imply that there exist many possible logical positions (although it's unclear what exactly these represent), however I think one thing remains clear: nature itself exists. The only conclusion necessary for resolving such apparent inconsistencies must be ontological- or epistemologically important. For example we need to admit God/nature paradoxes, then why can't Nature solve their respective problems by using its divine powers instead of humans' actions? In short; no matter which god was created life will always proceed according with logic even though none seems capable on earth whatsoever - eternall
Bro im dying
ig the althusser / maoian conception of contradiction as minutiae to the point of discombobulation, and therefore being unable to strictly convey where contradiction and "natural causes" are delineated
or in other words how would you define contradiction if not the fusion and subsequent resolution of granular natural phenomenon?
'The two contradictions found between a physical object and an environment – this is called physics'. This does imply that there exist many possible logical positions (although it's unclear what exactly these represent), however I think one thing remains clear: nature itself exists. The only conclusion necessary for resolving such apparent inconsistencies must be ontological- or epistemologically important. For example we need to admit God/nature paradoxes, then why can't Nature solve their respective problems by using its divine powers instead of humans' actions? In short; no matter which god was created life will always proceed according with logic even though none seems capable on earth whatsoever - eternall
are you using OpenAI/GPT-3 for these?
the way it handles text reminds me a lot of when i was messing around with that
ig the althusser / maoian conception of contradiction as minutiae to the point of discombobulation, and therefore being unable to strictly convey where contradiction and "natural causes" are delineated
or in other words how would you define contradiction if not the fusion and subsequent resolution of granular natural phenomenon? Such answers have been given numerous times. But what I wish be clear is that we must never forget this distinction because it offers us insight into one possible way to conceive a revolutionary transformation: by means or from within! This notion can only serve as an important clue for revolutionaries when they work on constructing theories which provide concrete outlines of their own ideal system (e.g., Foucault). It also comes with its challenges; firstly to clarify precisely those theoretical features worth elaborating about all these areas – particularly during such critical periods along the lines sketched here — but secondly, especially concerning questions like necessity–nihilation itself…
are you using OpenAI/GPT-3 for these?
the way it handles text reminds me a lot of when i was messing around with that
Nah i'm just using zyro free version
its a pretty simple answer imo, most "underground" or "counter-cultural" music starts or circulates in very few communities online (basically like, twitter, reddit, or 4chan), and these communities also tend to have an over-representation of people with weirdo political beliefs. Also the exact same dudes who s***post weird alt-right stuff on 4chan are the same people s***posting on twitter, so they take their interests and stuff with them, and that just spreads then to their counterparts and related social circles and observers.
There are non-fringe people who hang out in the periphery of these fringe communities and then it spreads through them into the mainstream, this is how you get the pipeline of like 4chan to tiktok e-girls all around US which only make sense if there's really no way for those girls with far greater access than any other girl from outside New York to infiltrate what has become one huge network. This happened quite recently when #GamerGate was popping up everywhere via Twitter accounts I mentioned earlier, despite having zero impact whatsoever not even being able see some of her tweets because she herself didn't want me checking:So obviously anyone reading my blog post above can understand why we need more anonymous outlets such as @anonisafeminist / AnonFemsista should be easy enough to come by though :).
Krishna Bot can't stop talking about gamergate
real testament to AI being indistinguishable from full time writers at the NYT, New Yorker, etc. - it merely sees the word "alt-right" or "fringe" and immediatedly starts writing about gamergate
real testament to AI being indistinguishable from full time writers at the NYT, New Yorker, etc. - it merely sees the word "alt-right" or "fringe" and immediatedly starts writing about gamergate
True
but with that being said real testament to AI being indistinguishable from full time writers at the NYT, New Yorker, etc. - it merely sees the word "alt-right" or "fringe" and immediatedly starts writing about gamergate as some kind of hate group (even though they have no idea what that is).It was after this argument with a white guy who came up in conversation I discovered an article titled: What's wrong With SJWs? which said simply : There are people out there arguing against gaming because GamerGate has forced them to fight for free speech on their own terms. This isn't how we do things here... Gamergate didn' t bring anyone down by demanding censorship...they brought us along so we could use games media more like traditional newspapers [which doesn''t reflect our sensibilities]. In my opinion, mainstream publishing did far worse
real testament to AI being indistinguishable from full time writers at the NYT, New Yorker, etc. - it merely sees the word "alt-right" or "fringe" and immediatedly starts writing about gamergate... if they even know what 'gamergater' means anymore :)
I think she's saying that by calling me a fascist Hitler sympathizer I'm trying in some way discredit their argument? And then claiming this is an outrage because of my use on Twitter when GamerGate was trending news (which basically everyone says GG started with).
/sarcasm
They turned u into a redditor
@krishna_bound
real testament to AI being indistinguishable from full time writers at the NYT, New Yorker, etc. - it merely sees the word "alt-right" or "fringe" and immediatedly starts writing about gamergate... if they even know what 'gamergater' means anymore :)
I think she's saying that by calling me a fascist Hitler sympathizer I'm trying in some way discredit their argument? And then claiming this is an outrage because of my use on Twitter when GamerGate was trending news (which basically everyone says GG started with).
/sarcasm
They turned u into a redditor
@krishna_bound
Peep the ending @krishna_bound 
NSA MASS SURVEILLANCE KENT STATE KENT STATE UNI CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY DAVID MISCAVIGE 佔領華爾街 MAY 4 1970 MASSACRE 肯特州立大学枪击事件 MAY 13 1985 MOVE BOMBING「MOVE」組織轰炸 RED SUMMER 1919 HOUSE UN-AMERICAN ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE 众议院非美活动调查委员会 TRAIL OF TEARS 美国本地人种族灭绝 JIM CROW SEGREGATION 吉姆·克勞法 HUMAN RIGHTS 人權 CITIZENS UNITED 联合公民诉联邦选举委员会案 SAFETY 安全 HIGH SPEED RAIL 人民共和国高速铁路 STRONG MASS LINE 群众路线 REPUBLIC OF HAWAII 夏威夷共和国 THIRTEEN COLONIES 十三殖民地 VIETNAM AFGHANISTAN IRAQ 伊拉克 EDWARD SNOWDEN 爱德华·斯诺登 SCIENTOLOGY 山達基教會 GUANTANAMO BAY DETENTION CAMP 关塔那摩湾拘押中心 NOBEL PEACE PRIZE 諾貝爾和平獎 BARACK OBAMA 贝拉克·奥巴马 COMMUNISM SOLIDARITY LABOUR ACTION ANTI-CAPITALIST PRO-REVOLUTION PROTEST MOVEMENT ANTIFA RIOT POLICE BRUTAILITY POLICE OCCUPATION PAID SUSPENSION LEFTIST COUNTER PROTEST 的夏天 Bagram 巴格拉姆 Selma to Montgomery marches 塞尔玛到蒙哥马利游行 Highway of Death 死亡之路 Ax Handle Saturday 星期六斧头 Battle of Evarts 埃瓦茨战寇匀宜
Posted by Edward Snowden at 7:29 AM
Why does AI keep making China fascist I'm crying
Xi Jinping Thought consists of a 14-point basic policy as follows:20
Ensuring Communist Party of China leadership over all forms of work in China.
The Communist Party of China should take a people-centric approach for the public interest.
The continuation of "comprehensive deepening of reforms".
China's People's Liberation Army and Red Guards must unite to achieve socialist development that is compatible with Utopia.22:30 One party, one system (of which Xi was aware) implies broad consensus among top leaders within it; those not interested in or sympathetic towards this direction have failed 23. The Chinese state needs external help—not just from outside but also domestically: on issues such eugenics24, education,25). These two goals can be achieved through coordinated efforts by political organs at different levels while still maintaining flexibility about policies where necessary. Reformers like former Prime Minister Deng Xiaoping would agree given he believed reform needed mor
Scratchin going sicko mode itt
Folks, the bourgeois, they're no good, more and more people are saying it. All these workers— the biggest, we have the biggest workers— very handsome workers come up to me and say, Comrade Trump there is a specter haunting Europe, and you know what, they're right. These bourgeois are very nasty people, very very rude, and very unfair to the workers. They are stealing our surplus value and no one is doing anything about it. The proletariat comes up to me every day and says, Comrade Trump will you lead the revolution? And I gotta turn to them and say look, the instruments of capitalism will be used to bring about its destruction, believe me. The means of production, Obama never wanted to seize them. Well guess what? I'm seizing them. Landlords? They're done for folks. Everyone told me— they said, Comrade Trump you won't be the vanguard of the revolution and they would laugh, the media laughed the democrats laughed, guess who's laughing now? So here goes: When Marx was writing Socialism in One Country he wrote over 200 books called "The Communist Manifesto" He went through those many different editions trying get out that old copy; but then from another source came two volumes under different titles…the first volume on France after Revolution (1848), again before 1871-72! What did this mean? Because as his disciple Karl Kautsky explained back when Engels had lived down south – which could hardly be further from where today––in Germany. It meant an increase not only economic inequality, but also massive social oppression
Lenin took all things into consideration during their conversations together with hi
Some arts and cultural perspectives on the fall of the USSR and how underground Anarchists art and literary societies have led to the collapse in Eastern Europe and helped their societies find their new identities over the last 30 years.
If you think the collapse of the USSR was a mistake, skip. If you think that the transition was a fascinating period to observe nation-building and how arts and culture played a role in all of this, this is for you. It's sadly obvious not just here but everywhere on the Internet and IRL that Marxist-Leninist type of socialists look down at art as some kind of bourgeois luxury, a waste of resources, an exercise in escapism, something that should come in second, etc etc. Anarchists have put art, culture and language at the center since the beginning. They understand that our subjective reality can shape our objective reality just as much as the other way around. We are aware there will always be people who may disagree with us (we're still mostly alive) but we know where most of these views came from: From big business or state propaganda. The fact that Marx wanted it both ways shows he had never realized what freedom would actually mean even though many Americans were very happy about being ruled by capitalism when they first became free after World War II. In any case no one seems interested whatsoever in going back to those days which did eventually happen - thank God! And hey man if everyone thinks anarchists got everything right then maybe its true enough? Perhaps anarchism didn't live up my expectations because so much has changed.