Communism Thread

Page 836 of 1355
Reply
  • Aug 24, 2022
    americana

    I don’t think your skillset is what determines your class. It is how your skillset is employed in a wider system where power is determined by ownership and subjugation to ownership

    Peasants can be bourgeois, just as much as those who handle financial capital (handle, not own). Finance workers can (very rarely) be proletariat just as much as the poorest serf. Brokers working long hours and handling multiple phones a la Wolf of Wall Street

    It’s about what you own and what owns you, not what you do to get into one of those positions

    (This is an textually unprincipled position, just off my head)

    yea this was my understanding too but i wanted to kind of butt heads a bit and see if there's something contradictory about it

  • Aug 24, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    deadacc

    i would understand in the case of for instance cuba, but a massive part of the privatization of healthcare is the monopolization of access to medical knowledge and practice as well as the accreditations.

    i mean i made the comparison of trucker owner operators as petty bourgeois, but i also am not entirely certain that is a correct classification

    There are plenty of jobs with restrictions. Engineers, architects, lawyers, teachers, doctors, accountants, auditors...

  • Aug 24, 2022
    SEGA GOON

    Thread is way faster and more active than on KTT1 and not filled with Bernie bros We did the math once and it was twice as fast as the ktt1 thread

    This thread in just under three years has more than half the pages that thread got in 9 years .

    Plus this socialism thread is actual Marxists not DSA social democrats.

  • Aug 24, 2022
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    SEGA GOON

    There are plenty of jobs with restrictions. Engineers, architects, lawyers, teachers, doctors, accountants, auditors...

    i think americana wrote what i was trying to get across. is that also along the lines of what you understand?

    also i heard the example of mcdonalds vs in n out as monopoly vs non monopoly capitalist. does that example make sense ?

    also are the monopoly capitalists solely individuals or structures as well? or is there a better way to understand them

  • Aug 24, 2022
    deadacc
    · edited

    i think americana wrote what i was trying to get across. is that also along the lines of what you understand?

    also i heard the example of mcdonalds vs in n out as monopoly vs non monopoly capitalist. does that example make sense ?

    also are the monopoly capitalists solely individuals or structures as well? or is there a better way to understand them

    In n Out got CA fast food in a monopoly trust

  • Aug 24, 2022

    I’ll be a dengist for In n Out

  • Aug 24, 2022
    ·
    2 replies
    RoosterShooter

    crazy how slow this thread is Tbh. 5-4 years ago this would have been the premiere ideology to compete with capitalism

    Thread is more active than it used to be tbh

    We don't have as many dumb arguments itt anymore bc kkktt all got banned so it's mostly just socialists itt discussing things itt

    Which i like better tbh, much higher quality discussion and it's not like we all agree on everything either

  • Aug 24, 2022
    ·
    2 replies
    deadacc

    interesting thank you

    and i assume you also understand doctors, lawyers, and professors to be petty bourgeois ?

    I would say they're labor aristocracy

    But more often than not they've made so much money that they start investing it as capital that they eventually do become petit bourgeois

  • Aug 24, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Scratchin Mamba

    Thread is more active than it used to be tbh

    We don't have as many dumb arguments itt anymore bc kkktt all got banned so it's mostly just socialists itt discussing things itt

    Which i like better tbh, much higher quality discussion and it's not like we all agree on everything either

    They gave EVERYONE a second chance it’s crazy how many more people get banned these days

  • Aug 24, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Scratchin Mamba

    Thread is more active than it used to be tbh

    We don't have as many dumb arguments itt anymore bc kkktt all got banned so it's mostly just socialists itt discussing things itt

    Which i like better tbh, much higher quality discussion and it's not like we all agree on everything either

    nice turn of phrase. lol no sarcasm.

    i was an avid user on the og site and didnt venture into the politic section. i regret that tbh. i was a tv/film andy.

    but from what other users have said, mass bans. controlled moderation. ostracization. and now its sort of peaceful.

    thats nice tbh.

    so do ppl still believe in a socialist ideology or a method in which there would be a healthy or consistent implementation of said policies of socialism?? dont have time to scroll thru the entire thread but

    it seems like more ppl are moving away from this ideology.

  • Scratchin Mamba

    I would say they're labor aristocracy

    But more often than not they've made so much money that they start investing it as capital that they eventually do become petit bourgeois

  • Aug 24, 2022
    ·
    1 reply

    I think there's a distinction to be made in class status vs revolutionary potential.

    Undoubtedly, the revolutionary potential of doctors earning 300k a year is a lot less than those of construction workers or even teachers, and yes that's also mostly based on their material interests. But does that make them not proletarians? I wouldn't say so. People who claim that the lumpen proletariat aren't revolutionary don't say they're not proletarians anymore, I think we can apply the same principle to high earning wage laborers

    That's just my take tho @deadac

  • Aug 24, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    americana

    They gave EVERYONE a second chance it’s crazy how many more people get banned these days

    sounds like u were there for the big transition. il take ur word for it that ppl got second chances to be cool about certain topics. tho i have no evidence to support it.

    how long have u been a part of this board

  • Aug 24, 2022
    ·
    1 reply

    I also don't in any way see how students would be petit bourgeois, if anything students have been some of the most revolutionary throughout history. Like Haile Selassie setting up universities backfired on him because those students eventually overthrew him in a revolution

  • Aug 24, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    RoosterShooter

    nice turn of phrase. lol no sarcasm.

    i was an avid user on the og site and didnt venture into the politic section. i regret that tbh. i was a tv/film andy.

    but from what other users have said, mass bans. controlled moderation. ostracization. and now its sort of peaceful.

    thats nice tbh.

    so do ppl still believe in a socialist ideology or a method in which there would be a healthy or consistent implementation of said policies of socialism?? dont have time to scroll thru the entire thread but

    it seems like more ppl are moving away from this ideology.

    Yeah i used to be in gd sxn a lot, it was wild lol it was basically just the racism sxn ngl

    I would say if anything people have become more disillusioned with the prospects of capitalism being reformed, a very big chunk of bernie bros have become full on communists since

  • Aug 24, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Scratchin Mamba

    I think there's a distinction to be made in class status vs revolutionary potential.

    Undoubtedly, the revolutionary potential of doctors earning 300k a year is a lot less than those of construction workers or even teachers, and yes that's also mostly based on their material interests. But does that make them not proletarians? I wouldn't say so. People who claim that the lumpen proletariat aren't revolutionary don't say they're not proletarians anymore, I think we can apply the same principle to high earning wage laborers

    That's just my take tho @deadac

    definitely the crucial aspect to this is revolutionary potential, and people from all classifications have revolutionary potential depending on specific circumstances - probably except for the monopoly capitalists.

    with that in mind its a semi pedantic point to scrutinize but i think its just one of those specifics that goes inherently unspecified that i randomly realized my understanding was not complete on.

  • Aug 24, 2022
    Scratchin Mamba

    I also don't in any way see how students would be petit bourgeois, if anything students have been some of the most revolutionary throughout history. Like Haile Selassie setting up universities backfired on him because those students eventually overthrew him in a revolution

    i think students would fall under the intelligentsia, which have prole and bourgeois aspects within the classification.

  • Aug 24, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    RoosterShooter

    sounds like u were there for the big transition. il take ur word for it that ppl got second chances to be cool about certain topics. tho i have no evidence to support it.

    how long have u been a part of this board

    I’ve been here since 2016 lol

  • Aug 24, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    deadacc

    definitely the crucial aspect to this is revolutionary potential, and people from all classifications have revolutionary potential depending on specific circumstances - probably except for the monopoly capitalists.

    with that in mind its a semi pedantic point to scrutinize but i think its just one of those specifics that goes inherently unspecified that i randomly realized my understanding was not complete on.

    I feel you, but it's not an unimportant topic at all tbh

    A lot of the bs coming from leftists who say all workers in the first world is bourgeois basically comes down to the fact that currently their revolutionary potential isn't so high

  • Aug 24, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Scratchin Mamba

    I would say they're labor aristocracy

    But more often than not they've made so much money that they start investing it as capital that they eventually do become petit bourgeois

    ig the real question i have is if there is some fundamental mistake in classifying petty bourgeois as something overdetermined rather than a more rigid classification in their relation to the means of production

  • Aug 24, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Scratchin Mamba

    Yeah i used to be in gd sxn a lot, it was wild lol it was basically just the racism sxn ngl

    I would say if anything people have become more disillusioned with the prospects of capitalism being reformed, a very big chunk of bernie bros have become full on communists since

    what aspects of captialism did they want to be reformed??

    sounds like the bernie bros (like other ppl have said) never intended to hold their ground or gather ppl to their side. as soon as he didnt preform, they lost their juice

  • Aug 24, 2022
    Scratchin Mamba

    I feel you, but it's not an unimportant topic at all tbh

    A lot of the bs coming from leftists who say all workers in the first world is bourgeois basically comes down to the fact that currently their revolutionary potential isn't so high

    i think something interesting is that the alliance between the petty bourgeois and the proletariat is extremely important in overthrowing capitalism.

    like people like to s*** on pet b's but according to history and historical theory that is the one class we HAVE to find allies within.

  • Aug 24, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    deadacc

    ig the real question i have is if there is some fundamental mistake in classifying petty bourgeois as something overdetermined rather than a more rigid classification in their relation to the means of production

    I would say yes. You can make a distinction within workers with the labor aristocracy, but to call them bourgeois obfuscates class imo. I think there's a distinction to be made in class vs revolutionary potential. If doctors were the most radicalized nobody would say they're petit bourgeois

  • Aug 24, 2022
    ·
    2 replies
    americana

    I’ve been here since 2016 lol

    not gonna lie, i dont remember when the transition between sites was or when i joined.

    still curious tho, have you experienced or been involved in a person or group that has transitioned either a part of or their full body beliefs since youve been here???

  • Aug 24, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    RoosterShooter

    what aspects of captialism did they want to be reformed??

    sounds like the bernie bros (like other ppl have said) never intended to hold their ground or gather ppl to their side. as soon as he didnt preform, they lost their juice

    Low wages, healthcare, infrastructure, public schools, housing etc, the usual mostly

    I think what disillusioned a lot of them was also the incredible amount of slander Bernie got during the campaign even from liberals. A lot of them saw how just these basic reforms were somehow seen as extremely dangerous by those in power and started asking questions about the system more broadly