s*** was crazy i was Saddam Husain on South Park when i was like 7
You were what
This is pretty straightforward and accurate
Meet you at the Museum of London for an arm wrestling match tomorrow yeah?
the socialism thread needs u to win if u lose ur not allowed to post here our reputation will be ruined
the socialism thread needs u to win if u lose ur not allowed to post here our reputation will be ruined
I been in the gym 5 days a week since the beginning of the year I’ve been waiting for this
Good interventions exist like Kosovo, but that wasn't one of them
David Cameron was a complete fool
You cannot be real
s*** was crazy i was Saddam Husain on South Park when i was like 7
Yeah when even contrarian shows like South Park & Family Guy are basically supporting the war you know there’s something up lol
You cannot be real
I and everyone in kosovo grateful that they didn't die is real
Also why are you posting on holiday in London bro go to the Tate Modern or something
I and everyone in kosovo grateful that they didn't die is real
Also why are you posting on holiday in London bro go to the Tate Modern or something
People in Kosovo are obviously grateful but that’s one side of the story
ask people in Serbia how they feel about it. If your entire justification relies on being humanitarian you can’t ignore half the situation just cause you don’t like the country’s alignment
People in Kosovo are obviously grateful but that’s one side of the story
ask people in Serbia how they feel about it. If your entire justification relies on being humanitarian you can’t ignore half the situation just cause you don’t like the country’s alignment
It was either bomb or genocide happens
Would love it if there was more nuance to it than that, but im afraid their probably wasn't. He'd already pulled it off twice, and previous ways to dissuade Milosevic had failed
While there is plenty of animosity in serbia for what happened, it's not enough for a large section of the population and political class to want to join the EU and move westward.
And they usually lie about that too
Fisher devotes a great section to this type of s*** in capitalist realism lol
“Chapter 7: …if you can watch the overlap of one reality with
another’: capitalist realism as dreamwork and
memory disorder”
‘Being realistic’ may once have meant coming to terms with of a reality experienced as solid and immovable. Capitalist realism, however, entails subordinating oneself to a reality that is infinitely plastic, capable of reconfiguring itself at any moment. We are confronted with what Jameson, in his essay ‘The Antimonies Of The Postmodern’, calls ‘a purely fungible present in which space and psyches alike can be processed and remade at will’. The ‘reality’ here is akin to the multiplicity of options available on a digital document, where no decision is final, revisions are always possible, and any previous moment can be recalled at any time. The middle manager I referred to above turned adaptation to this ‘fungible’ reality it into a fine art. He asserted with full confidence a story about the college and its future one day – what the implications of the inspection were likely to be; what senior management was thinking; then literally the next day would happily propound a story that directly contra- dicted what he previously said. There was never a question of his repudiating the previous story; it was as if he, only dimly remem- bered there ever being another story. This, I suppose, is ‘good management’. It is, also, perhaps the only way to stay healthy amidst capitalism’s perpetual instability. “
It was either bomb or genocide happens
Would love it if there was more nuance to it than that, but im afraid their probably wasn't. He'd already pulled it off twice, and previous ways to dissuade Milosevic had failed
While there is plenty of animosity in serbia for what happened, it's not enough for a large section of the population and political class to want to join the EU and move westward.
no one wants to excuse genocide of course, but all i'm saying is that you shouldn't confuse moral obligation and strategic interest just because both - in this case - would have led to a similar relative preferable result retroactively. NATO didn't intervene to stop a genocide. If the US cared about stopping genocide specifically rather than furthering interest, Africa and South Asia would like us a lot more
Is it good a genocide was stopped? Yeah, of course. However the action wasn't taken for that reason and you shouldn't act like it was.
no one wants to excuse genocide of course, but all i'm saying is that you shouldn't confuse moral obligation and strategic interest just because both - in this case - would have led to a similar relative preferable result retroactively. NATO didn't intervene to stop a genocide. If the US cared about stopping genocide specifically rather than furthering interest, Africa and South Asia would like us a lot more
Is it good a genocide was stopped? Yeah, of course. However the action wasn't taken for that reason and you shouldn't act like it was.
I find the whole argument about stopping a genocide confusing too, there wasn't an ongoing genocide in 1999, if it was about that they should have intervened in 1995. It's easy to say you're preventing a genocide, you can say that in any armed ethnic conflict pretty much
I find the whole argument about stopping a genocide confusing too, there wasn't an ongoing genocide in 1999, if it was about that they should have intervened in 1995. It's easy to say you're preventing a genocide, you can say that in any armed ethnic conflict pretty much
my assumption is he's saying that retroactively we can now say we prevented a genocide which is also part of my point, no one intervened with the thought of stopping a genocide, they intervened because of geopolitics
I find the whole argument about stopping a genocide confusing too, there wasn't an ongoing genocide in 1999, if it was about that they should have intervened in 1995. It's easy to say you're preventing a genocide, you can say that in any armed ethnic conflict pretty much
Also the entire Rwanda thing
@Nessy @krishna_bound
did not expect to see nore here lmfao
the african currency theory is probably cap tho, there were a lot more reasons france and qatar wanted him dead
did not expect to see nore here lmfao
HOLY MOLY GUACAMOLE GIVE IT UP FOR GADDAFI GODDAMMIT
the african currency theory is probably cap tho, there were a lot more reasons france and qatar wanted him dead
It was one of the stated reasons in the Clinton emails
This wasn't the reason he did it and even if it was, pressure needed to be put on. It was either a temporary bombing that aimed to limit civilian casualties, or the extermination of an entire ethnic group. In utilitarian terms it had to happen, had it not happened you wouldn't have any Kosovar people left
Of course, it was still awful. Milosevic should have been removed earlier in the decade and this s*** wouldn't have happened
We’re bombing schools to limit civilian casualties