Wot that mean?

lolol

bruh wtf

conservatives don't like land developments near their homes because thatll drive down the property value

My city proposed a development to build tiny homes to house ~60 people in a mostly industrial area. The residents in the area had a community meeting and their sentiment was

Nonetheless, many of the roughly 30 residents who attended the meeting said they felt “ambushed” and “strong-armed.” They said they liked the idea, but not the location.

sacbee.com/news/local/article260800042.html#storylink=cpy

This is usually how people's thinking goes, "homeless people need to live somewhere, but not near me", aka not in my backyard aka nimby

Nobody likes lowering property value lol don’t try to put it on one side

the concept of property value itself is inherently flawed and its usually cuckservatives that are nimbys lmao

Tell me you don’t own a house

Limousines liberals are no exception

has to be a troll post

Lol, without the buzzwords, please.

How will you, Americana, if given all the Infinity Stones, create a self-sustaining system that is as close tp perfect as possible.

Because, don't get it twisted, capitalism has been a boon for mankind until it reached its late stage

You're veeeerrryy easily impressed

So your solution isn't to rectify that but instead throw away the whole system and replace it with one that has historically never worked without significant issues?

the most significant issue that the other one has is that the ruling class violently crushes it before it can develop

we will crush them properly next time tho

an absolute boon bro one half of my family got taken as slaves and the other half had their land stolen, culture erased and language beaten out of them and is now over 50% of the prison population

but iphone

Reread my post above. That is my answer. I’ll happily discuss the theory of how such an application would look at first and how it would have to progress but there’s no buzzwords in that statement for anyone remotely versed in the idea of economic progress.

That’s simply as condensed as my ideal can get

Can’t rectify something that is inherent.

Socialism is a society where the working class have organised a revolution through instruments of mass democracy. To get to socialism, workers (the vast majority of society) have to overthrow the rule of capitalists (an exploitative and oppressive few) by exercising their collective power. They do this by seizing the means of production together and shutting down the capitalist economy. In order to organise something so big and complex, workers throw up alternative organs of government that are completely different from what we call parliamentary 'democracy' today. From each workplace, delegates are elected to these bodies by fellow workers, but unlike bourgeois democracy, they are immediately recallable, get an ordinary worker's salary and receive no benefits. Delegates then represent the majority positions held in their workplace at the regional and national levels. With worker control over production and the vast majority of humanity now in charge of society, decisions can be made on the basis of human need, not profit. With no minority rule, exploitation and oppressions (such as sexism and racism) are abolished, as the interests of the many (who have no stake in such things) prevailed.

In short, socialism is when the working class, in alliance with all oppressed groups, take control of society by using their inherently democratic and collective power to expel the capitalist class via revolution. It is through the process of mass movement and revolution that the working class develops the necessary confidence and experience to organise society. This lays the basis for the withering away of the state (an institution of capitalist control), the abolishment of oppression and the realisation of a classless society.

He’s not gonna read that as sad as it is

Truth

People think the Bay Area is some big lefty land when in reality it’s just unbridled neoliberalism and corporate d***sucking

prove to me that building more housing will decrease nearby property values lol

crazy how people are still running with this myth

Buyers

It’s all simply speculation and hearsay caused by liberal’s irrational disgust for living near and interacting with other people